newsitems

    Strasbourg's ECHR's case-law on Refugees and displaced persons unexpectedly topped the European Agenda, from the current Cyprus' talks up to ..Brussels' EU Summit, as decisions on EU's top jobs were suspended on finding a solution to Czech President Klaus' claim for exceptions to the European Human Rights' principles on victims' right to return, restitution or compensation of usurpated homes and private properties, afraid that they might be applied to German-culture populations expulsed at the aftermath of the 2nd World War..

A surprise visit of ECHR's President, Jean-Paul Costa, to the Czech Republic, a few days ago, coincided with Klaus' anouncement welcoming a Swedish EU Presidency's proposal and accepting to "start working" on it, the same day that Costa, after meeting him in Prague, was visiting also the Czech Constitutional Court, (where a complaint against Lisbon Treaty is pending), at Brno on October 23, 2009.

Adding to a surprising series of converging "coincidences", the move was made the same day that, after denouncing earlier strong disagreements with Turkey on Refugees' Human Rights, now Cyprus' Media reported an agreement between Cyprus' President Christofias and Turkish Cypriot leader Talat for a "Formula" on Refugees' homes and properties with "exceptions" and special "categories" for plots of land where, meanwhile, the Turkish Occupation regime may have built "roads, public utility buildings,.. or houses and collective buildings". Something which was exceptionally hailed by T/C leader Talat as "a very good development, because with that method we overcame the deadlock on (Refugees') properties".

    But, meanwhile, ECHR reminded both to Klaus and Turkey the "Loizidou" and "Cyprus v. Turkey" case-law against "Continuing"" violations of Greek Cypriot Refugees' Family life and Property Rights by condemning Ankara at another landmark case (Olymbiou)  this week.

    And Christofias reportedly said that he'd ask at EU Summit assurances that any concession to Klaus for 2ndWW issues should not affect the differend situation which still exists in Cyprus since the 1974 Turkish Military invasion, nor ECHR's case-law on Greek Cypriot Refugees, elaborated between 1996 and 2001.

- "I don't know why this visit (to Klaus and to the Czech Constitutional Court) was made now, nor what was said by President Costa", simply declined to answer ECHR's experienced Head of Communication, Rodrick Liddell, to "EuroFora"'s questions, without, however, denying that it might have been related with on-going attempts to convince Czechs to ratify the Lisbon Treaty speaking

    Liddell was asked by "EuroFora" why Klaus claimed that he was afraid of Lisbon Treaty's "Human Rights' Charter", if a similar result on displaced persons' properties might be eventually obtained also through the exisiting ECHR's mecanism, that the Czech Republic has already ratified

    - It's true that "ECHR already has competence to consider complaints lodged against the Czech Republic",  However, "in principle it couldn't go as far as to cover 2nd World War cases" (dating from 1945), But "I don't know" "if it might be considered a continuous" violation of Displaced persons' rights, as in Cyprus' cases (dating from 1974), the ECHR Official carefully replied..

    -  "As you know yourself, the events which are at the origin of a case must occur after the ratification of the ECHR. That's the principle. But, there are, as you know, situations where the link between the events and the complaint is considered to be sufficient", he reminded.

    Smiling at "EuroFora""s question on the astonishing "coincidence" that Klaus "positive" statement for a possible deal with the EU on his claim on German Displaced persons came "the same day" that ECHR's President Costa visited him, the ECHR's Senior Official, simply replied that he had "no information on whether the President's visit might have contributed to influence that", and promissed "to ask him about that", without denying.

    Meanwhile, Karel Jungwiert, the judge elected at the ECHR in respect of the Czech Republic, who had accompagnied President Costa in his visit to Prague and Brno, was still out of Strasbourg exceptionally "until next week", apparently following constantly and consulted on the on-going dealings on Displaced persons' Rights between the Swedish EU Presidency and Czech President Klaus in the run up to Brussels' EU Summit this week-end, as well as to the preparation of Czech Constitutional Court's verdict, due to be published at Brno early next week, "EuroFora" learned from other ECHR Officials.

    ECHR's President Costa was "aware" of the recent moves by Czech President Klaus' and a group of Senators to oppose Lisbon Treaty by refusing ratification as long as the 2nd WW's issue of German culture displaced People's properties wasn't definitively settled, and by lodging a collective complaint to the Czech Constitutional Court, respectively, and all that "had initially incited him to consider postponing his visit", another ECHR Official said to "EuroFora". 

 But she wasn't in a position to explain what made Costa, finally, change stance and decide to visit the Czech Republic, its President Klaus, and its Constitutional Court, at Prague and Brno the 22 and 23 of October, nor what was really said the day Lisbon Treaty's ratification was apparently unblocked...     

All these converging but unusual Facts inevitably provoked on-going Speculations in Strasbourg on how ECHR's President Costa might have helped to convince Czech President Klaus to start moving on Lisbon Treaty, despite his proclaimed fear that 2nd WW German culture people might ask ECHR to extend "Loizidou" and "Cyprus v. Turkey" case-law, initially concerning "continuing" violations of Greek Cypriot Refugees' Homes and properties     

Logically, this could be done either by ... giving up to Klaus' demand, i.e. by restricting (in one way or another) the practical functioning and the impact of ECHR's case-law, by imposing, fex. more strict temporary and/or restitution limits, etc., or, on the contrary, by reminding him that ECHR already existed, independently of Lisbon Treaty. and Human Rights could not be modified for political expediences.

    But the first option woud be obviously percieved as a serious setback on Human Rights' protection for Political expediencies , which could also provoke a dangerous precedent for other claims, by other States too in future..     

On the contrary, mainstream French Newspaper "Figaro" strongly criticized, in this regard, the Czech measures of 1945, known as "Benes' regulations", "forgotten in comparison to the Shoa" by the NAZI, about "the eviction of Sudetes  : .A measure of "Ethnic Cleansing", which "confiscated the properties and expulsed more than 2,5 million Germans, Men, Women and Children", in revenge of Hitler's acts in the name of a controversial "collective responsibility".
     - But, "nobody didn't ever recognize the Benes' regulations, since 1945, neither in the West, nor in the European Union", the mainstream French Newspaper stressed, criticizing Klaus for "asking now the EU to indirectly legitimize the "infernal" Benes' regulations about past "Ethnic Cleansings"..

    However, Klaus' move seems "absurd" since Lisbon Treaty's "Fundamental Rights' Charter" "cannot be applied, at any case, on what happened back in 1945", "Figaro" said.

    Thus, another possibility is that, perhaps, on the contrary, Costa contributed to convince Klaus by simply reminding him that ECHR already existed and might eventually consider applications also by German-culture people expulsed from the Czech Republic after the 2nd WW (if certain conditions were fullfilled) asking to get back their properties, independently of the Lisbon Treaty and its "Fundamental Rights"' Charter.

    This would obviously be more in line with Human Rights' general principles, regardless of whether ECHR might accept or reject such applications as inadmissible, or unfounded.

    ECHR's Judgement condemning Turkey on Greek Cypriot Refugee Olymbiou's case for violating her Family life and Property Rights (Articles 8, and 1 Protocol 1 ECHR), by confirming the "Loizidou" and "Cyprus v. Turkey" case-law, denouncing a "Continuous Denial of Access", and a "Continuing and Total Denial of Access to their Property (as) a clear interference with the Right of the Displaced Greek Cypriots to the peaceful enjoyment of (their) posessions" (respectively), topically reminded both to Ankara and Klaus the European Human Rights' principles.

    - "But no case ever declared admissible by the European Court on the evictions of that period" of 2nd World War from the Czech Republic, "Figaro" also noted.

    Is this, perhaps, Klaus' real demand also for the present and the future ?  In that case, could such a demand be acceptable by Europe, without endangering the entire European mecanism for the protection of Human Rights ?

    For Cyprus, the only "advantage" from Klaus' manoeuvers could be that Nicosia might take on its side, at least symbolically, Berlin, (and in extension, Germany's closest partner : France), vis a vis Turkey's partitionist claims against Refugees' human rights.

    But it's also true, that Lisbon Treaty provides for EU's accession to the ECHR, expected to submit, for the 1st time, all acts of EU institutions themselves to the control of Strasbourg's Court on complaints for Human Rights violations.

However, many had said earlier that, regardless of what anyone might think of him, Klaus' critical view on the EU might be useful at least in order to help EU Citizens fight against Bureaucracy. This leaves it an even deeper Mystery to know what or who convinced him to change orientation and focus, on the contrary, on restricting Citizens' Human Rights...

***

    Impunity for shooting to kill at Cyprus' Bufer Zone persists until now (2009), even for  killing an unarmed youngster aged 19 who saluted Turkish soldiers as "Brothers", or gravely wounding a 60 years old Woman, etc, ECHR denounced condemning Ankara twice in Strasbourg, the same week that new German Government anounced an EU-Russia-USA Summit for Berlin Wall's fall 20th Anniversary, and adopted a 2009-2014 program stressing Turkey's obligation to "strictly fullfil all EU Criteria" if it wants to continue lucrative EU Negotiations.  

    The move came while the old formula that EU - Turkey "Negotiations will continue", whatever might happen during the next Years,  as in the previous coalition with SPD's "Socialists" (for 2005-2009), was now (for the 2009-2014 new period), skipped, on the contrary, by the new German Government coalition of ChristianDemocrats and Liberals..

    All 3 tragic Cyprus' cases judged by ECHR this week obviously point at Berlin Wall's fall, in one way or another :

 In the 1st case, an "unarmed" Youngster (aged only 19), "Stelios", was walking "alone" , in broad Daylight, waving his hat to his Turkish Cypriot compatriots and "shouting : -"Come Brother !", ECHR notes.

    But he was shot and killed "by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot Soldiers", without any previous warning, as ECHR found, based on UNO's data which report that only "a single shot was heard".  

    - "At that moment", the "isolated man" "was outnumbered by the (Turkish) Security forces", who were "in complete control of the area, and it would have been possible for them to stop Mr Panayi without jeopardising his life", EuroJudges found.

    Moreover, ECHR "regrets that the Turkish or Turkish-Cypriot forces hampered the Humanitarian intervention of UNFICYP soldiers", "preventing immediate Medical care from being administered to the victim of the shooting". "Thus acting in a manner which is incompatible with the obligation to protect Life", even while "a seriously injured man lying on the ground in Mr Panayi's circumstances would hardly have been capable of posing any threat whatsoever to armed ..soldiers".

    - "UN Secretary-General reported that UNFICYP soldiers had been prevented from reaching Stelios Kalli Panayi “by Turkish-Cypriot soldiers who fired shots in the direction of the UNFICYP soldiers each time the latter tried to move forward”. This was described by the UNO as “Hostile action, including live Fire against UNFICYP", EuroJudges noted.

     Thus, ECHR concluded "that Stelios Kalli Panayi was killed by agents of the respondent State (of Turkey), and that the use of force was not justified by any ..exception"

    But the total Impunity of those responsible for the illegal Killing persists until now (2009), also denounced ECHR :

    - "As regards Criminal-law remedies, the Court observes that the (Turkish) Government have not provided any information concerning an Investigation into the circumstances of the shooting". "Moreover, even assuming that an independent body had started an Investigation, ...it would have been pending since ..1996 without achieving any substantial results" until 2009 : i.e. for more than 13 Years !...

    - Thus, the European "Court finds that the (Turkish) authorities failed to carry out an effective Criminal Investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of Stelios Kalli Panayi. ...Accordingly ...there has been a violation of (the Human Right to Life) in this respect also"

    The victim's Family, his Father and Mother, who "had been Refugees since the 1974 Turkish military intervention", and "had raised their son at a considerable cost until the age of 19", risked also to be abandoned now alone in their old age, after their unique son's killing. Contrary to their legitimate "expectation" that "as in other Mediterranean Member States of the European Union, children were supposed to take responsibility for their parents' care and social welfare in old age", EuroJudges noted.

     But it is astonishing that ECHR's previous leadership left another case, of even more atrocious brutality, concerning a Woman shot and gravely wounded by Turkish Soldiers close to the Buffer Zone, without taking any action in Strasbourg for .. 12 Years : 1996 - 2008, until the victim ...died meanwhile in 2005, vainly waiting during 9 Years from the European Court any elementary Justice !

    It's only ...12 Years after the victim lodged its application to Strasbourg, while still suffering from grave Health consequences from wounds provoked by Turkish soldiers' gunshots, that ECHR decided to simply .. transmit her case file to the respondent Turkish Authorities, in 2008" ! If any other, national court, had delayed so much, it would have been certainly condemned by .. ECHR for excessive delay into providing justice, (Article 6 ECHR).

    Georgia Andreou, a 59 years old  Poor Woman, refugee obiged to work as "Hotel Cleaner" for just "414 Cyprus £ as Monthly Salary", was "hit in the abdomen by a Bullet" fired by "Turkish or Turkish Cypriot soldiers", and "collapsed", "was taken to (a) Hospital" and "operated on, but lost one of her Kidneys", became "Unable to work" after "3 Surgical Operations", and was still suffering, many years afterwards, from "Pleuritis", "post-Traumatic Stress and Depression", ECHR noted.

    Her story starts when, in 1996 "over one hundred Cypriot and other European motorcyclists set off from Berlin, and made their way through EU to Cyprus" for "a demonstration aimed at protesting against the Turkish occupation".  "One of the Greek-Cypriot demonstrators, Anastasios Isaak, was beaten to death" by more than 10 Turkish extremists imported from mainland Turkey at the Buffer Zone, who persisted to hit their victim with sticks and to throw stones to his head, even when he fell down, lying at the feet of his aggressors, until he was atrociously killed by a mob, as well known Films revealed. ECHR condemned Turkey on 2008 for "the killing of ..Isaak, and (for) the failure to conduct any effective investigation" in order to find and punish those responsible for the killing, EuroJudges remind now.

    Isaak "was a Friend of her Son", and Georgia "attended (his) Funeral", after which, another unarmed Greek Cypriot demonstrator,; "Solomos Solomou, crossed the ...Ceasefire Line and started to climb a flagpole. He was shot and later died from his injuries". ECHR condemned Turkey in 2008 for "the killing of ..Solomou, and (for) the failure to conduct an efficient Investigation".

    After "Solomou was ..shot by a Turkish or Turkish-Cypriot soldier (he) fell to the ground with blood flowing profusely from his neck (the autopsy later revealed that Solomou was hit by 5 Bullets),  

    Then, "Turkish or Turkish-Cypriot soldiers ..proceeded to fire some 25 to 50 rounds indiscriminately into the Crowd" .."UNFICYP ...Commanders ...observed uniformed Turkish or Turkish-Cypriot military personnel kneeling down and firing in the direction of the (unarmed) Demonstrators. As a result of the indiscriminate shooting by Turkish or Turkish-Cypriot soldiers, 2 British UNFICYP soldiers were shot from behind, and 2 Greek-Cypriot Civilians were also hit by Gunfire". Georgia Andreou, "one of the civilians, who sustained a serious gunshot wound to the abdomen, was standing outside the UN buffer zone close to the ..checkpoint", UNO's Report denounces, as ECHR observed.

    UNO "strongly protest(ed) the totally unwarranted use of force by Turkish or Turkish-Cypriot military personnel which resulted in the killing of Solomou and in injuries to 2 Peacekeepers and 2 Civilians", EuroJudges note.

    "The Court attaches ..weight to the fact that, according to the eyewitnesses, the opening of fire was totally Unwarranted and Not even preceded by a Warning shot". And Georgia even "had not crossed the ceasefire line, (but) had been hit by the bullet while standing outside the UN buffer zone", ECHR's judgement denounces.

    The gravely wounded Woman, died later by "Brain Strokes" provoked by "high blood Pressure", following "post-traumatic Stress and Depression", after she experienced these tragic events. While vainly waiting 9 years for Justice to be done by the European Court, (1996-2005), among several related sufferings, even "a ..Metallic element was detected on the right side of her Liver, possibly due to the Bullet from the Gun". The Doctor who examined her all these years observed that "she seemed  frightened from the events that occurred and very troubled by the Surgery and the side Effects....there was an Intense Stressful reaction as well as indication of Anxiety and Depression. ...with indication of Phobias. Her sleep was disturbed and she developed Panic Attacks that were very hard to deal with and treat. The events of the Shooting were being revisited in her mind and her narration of the Stressful, Scary and Painful events stigmatized her until her death, .. without significant improvement until the end of her life.”
--------------------
    Compared to the Gravity of the Andreou case, there is no need to describe in detail also the 3rd Cyprus' "Buffer Zone" case, judged by ECHR this week, on Greek Cypriot Refugee Woman Mrs Andri Olymbiou, aged 60, who, in addition to the "continuing total denial of acces" to her Family Home and Property in the Occupied Territories of Cyprus, was also harshly-streated by Turkish Security forces when they brutally dispersed a Demonstration of more than 100 Women, throwing several of them, ( including Olymbiou), in Prison for more than three days.

    ECHR condemned anew Turkey for persisting to violate Greek Cypriot Refugees and displaced persons' Human Right to return to their Family Homes and/or use their private Properties in the Occupied Territories of Cyprus held by Ankara's Army.

    - "As a refugee, I have an inextinguishable desire to return. I want to return there where I lived my Childhood. I think that both the Greek Cypriots and the Turkish Cypriots should have this right. I believe that no one has the right and the authority to throw us out of our Houses. As long as I am living, I will want to return to my house. For me there is no Green Line. There is a United Cyprus", had simply stated Olymbiou before being thrown to Prison, ECHR notes.

    Olymbiou, together with other 100 Greek Cypriot Women, had demonstrated at a School located in the Buffer Zone, (against Turkish Military Occupation, for the truth to be found on "MISSING" persons, and to support Refugees), the same Year that in Germany the infamous Berlin Wall had fallen : 1989.
 
             This makes it even more clear that what is common in all these 3 Cyprus' cases chosen this week by ECHR is that they all refer to Turkish brutal atrocities repeatedly committed at the "Buffer Zone" which still divides Cyprus, and where a scandalously total Impunity of killers persists until now (2009), while, on the contrary, the new German Government prepares a PanEuropean and Trans-Atlantic Summit to celebrate 20 Years since Berlin Wall's fall...

German Chancellor Angie Merkel chose on Saturday to nominate as new EU Commissioner for 2009-2014 Strasbourg's neighbour, the Prime Minister of nearby Regional State (Länder) of Baden-Wurttemberg, Gunther Oettinger from Stuttgart, who is also a specialist on Media policy, with an interest for On-line NewsMedia as "EuroFora".

The move came shortly after Merkel confirmed that her new Foreign Minister will also come from Strasbourg-linked city, via Rhine river, Koeln, thanks to Liberal Party FPD's leader, her partner in the new-coalition, Guido Westerwelle. 

Westerwelle has started his career at FDP's leadership initially as Secretary General when Germany's foreign minister was Klaus Kinkel, who often made Press Conferences at Strasbourg's European Press Center in : As, fex. in 1997, when he had already stressed, in reply to Strasbourg Journalists' question including "EuroFora"'s founder, that "Europe needs an Industrial response" to Boeing-Lokheed a.o. US High-Tech conglomerates, also in order to develop its Defence and Security policy in the World.

Merkel reportedly "surprised" Oettinger by proposing him the Top EU job just before the conclusion of the new Coalistion talks, and she was "happy" that he accepted, expressing her belief that "he will become a heavy-weight" in the New EU Commission.

Speaking afterwards, Oettinger stresed that he sees himself not only as a a defender of Germany's interests "in Brussels and Strasbourg", but also "as serving the European Idea".

If he's confirmed by EU Parliament, he would like to serve in the new EU Commission at "a task related to Economy", he said.

Oettinger has often visited Strasbourg and its surroundings, particularly on common Franco-German projects, such as the creation of a tri-national Metropolitan Region at "Ober-rhein" area, the development of Renewable Energy sources, etc.

Pointing at the importance of Research, Education and Innovation, Oettinger had recently stressed that if Europe "networked its Institutes and Labos", it could "become as strong as" the USA. (F.ex. the Ober-rhein Metropolitan region, "from Karlsruhe to Bale", could "become as strong as Boston").

Resuming in 2009 more than 8 Years of experience as head of CDU's policy on Media (1999-2007), Oettinger stressed, on issues of  interest for "EuroFora" and other projects that, today, "Internet Media" are in the process of "winning an increasing influence on the (public) opinion".

But he warned also against the risk for some "Search Engines" to "threaten Pluralism" "in the area of Electronic Media" : "F.ex.", "they don't reflect an objective search result, if it depends on factors which don't guarantee the visibility of certain contents, or allows exclusions".

"However", visibility and "detectableness ...is ..an essential prerequisite for Pluralism in a Digitalized World", he observed.

Oettinger also pleaded for "more transparent" and "foreseeable" decisions of Public bodies taking decisions which affect Medias' freedoms, in order to help "emege a higher level of investment security".

The need for imminent EU Council's decisions to protect Europe from massive illegal immigration traffickers mainly accross EU's Southern Maritime Borders, guarded by FRONTEX, and in particular to convince 3rd Countries as Turkey to respect their obligations, was strongly stressed, after EU Parliament's debates this week in Strasbourg, also by French President Sarkozy and Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi, in a joint move on Friday.                                   

Astonishingly, facts debated by MEPs, EU Council and Commission, and cited by the Italian and French leaders, reveal that the EU-candidate and EU- funded Turkey behaves worse than ..Libya !

Europe, contrary to the US, being surrounded by other 2 nearby larger Contintents, Africa and Asia, often with easy to cross Maritime External Borders, particularly from the South/East, the main focus is on the Mediterranean :

Thus, the heads of the 2 bigger Mediterranean countries, French President Sarkozy and Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi, in a joint Letter to EU Council's chair Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt, and EU Commission's President Barroso, stressed the need for "the next EU Council... to decide immediately" on the matter.

- "A considerable challenge for EU and all its member states, on Humanitarian, Political and Social grounds, is Illegal Immigration", which "exerts an unprecedented pressure on EU's Exiernal Borders, in particularly in the Mediterranean", they stress from the outset

- That's why, "Mediterranean is an important Test for the credibility of the European activities", as well as "for the application of the EU pact on immigration and asylum" already decided in 2008.

- "Solidarity among EU Member States should not remain only words, but should go towards a real burden-sharing", they note.

The "clear political message to revitalise Europe's commitment against illegal migration in the Mediterranean", launched by "EU Council of June" 2009, "must now have a concrete and ambitious follow up", they observe.

Paradoxicaly, while one of the "clear and detailed Political Orientations" which "must be decided without delay", is the obligation of "3rd countries of origin to cooperate" in order to "struggle against illegal immigration at the Sea", nevertheless, a non-candidate, and non EU - funded 3rd Country as Libya had its illegal migration flow "recently reduced", while, on the contrary, EU candidate and EU-funded Turkey "has still to make similar efforts" !

Thus, Libya only needs to "consolidate" its recent moves by concluding an agreement with the EU, (with the help also of International organizations providing protection whenever due)? But, on the contrary, "Turkey is 1st to have to assume its Responsibilities, mainly on Borders control and on Readmission", the French and Italian leaders stress.

What is needed is "a real mobilization of Countries of origin, transit and destination, ..across the main migration roads, focusing on prevention and struggling against illegal migration networks" or trafficking of human beings.

The other key points are : - "Maritime operations in the Mediterranean" with "a clear commitment" to "intercept and return back", while"respecting International obligations".  "Specialized Offices for Frontex" "created wherever needed", for "monitoring and checks" to act "on the spot". "Common operations of Airflights for return at an EU level". The creation of an "Erasmus" program for "Border Guards", "in order to help emerge .. a real professional community Europe-wide".

    The French and Italian concerns are largely shared also in Greece and Cyprus, while EU Council and Commission are already "aware", showed EU Parliament's debates, earlier this week in Strasbourg :

    Even .. "harassment by Turkey of Aircraft operated by the EU Agency for External Border Security (FRONTEX), was denounced by MEP Nicolaos Houdis, in a written question to the Swedish EU Presidency, debated during EU Parliament's plenary in Strasbourg.

- "Since May 2009, 6 incidents have been recorded in which aircraft operated by the EU agency for External Border security (Frontex) have been subjected to harassment, either by Turkish Aircraft or through Radio communications", observed the MEP.

 F.ex.  "on .. September ..a Frontex Helicopter flown by ..Latvian pilots ..en route from the island of Kos to Samos, ..received radio interference from a Turkish radar ..demanding that it withdraw from the area !", he noted, asking the EU "what measures it will it take vis a vis Turkey ?".
-----------------------------------
    - "EU Councll is aware of these incidents", replied EU Chaiwoman in office, Swedish EU Minister Cecilia Malmstrom, and "says to Turkey that as a candidate country, they have to share Europe's values".

    - "Frontex's turbo Airplanes" are part of its "common operations" which "are important contributions to the protection of EU's External air Borders", she observed.

    - "Borders depend from International Legal Treaties", and "EU has urged Turkey to strive for better neighborhood relations".

    Fex. "Poseidon 2009 operations" by Frontex, taking place in Greece", "focus on preventing illegal crossing of borders by individuals who come from, or transit through Turkey and North-African countries, trying to reach the Greek coasts". This "includes, of course, also the use or technical means in EU's Airspace along the Greek islands' Border", and "Turkey was informed", EU Chairwoman noted.  

    - Thus, "EU urged Turkey to avoid all kinds of Threats, provocation of Conflicts, or measures which can damage the positive climate and the possibilities that conflicts find a peaceful solution", while "we (EU) systematically remind Turkey that it must have Good Neighborhoud Relations", fex. on May and July 2009, Malmstrom stressed.

    Currently, Turkey is negotiating about "methods for working" eventually with Frontex, she added, but without elucidating what kind of "methods" Ankara asks..
-----------------------
    Moreover, "EU Commission is aware" of "a particularly grave problem" of "illegal immigration in Cyprus" where "a large number of 3rd countries' citizens illegaly cross the "Green Line"" from the territories occupied by Ankara's Army, a reply given to a written MEP question stressed this week.

    But controversial EU Commisioner on Enlargement, Oli Rehn, was criticized by Cyprus' MEP Antigoni Pericleus-Papadopulu, for "not even intending to exert pressure on Turkey" (fex. by "threatening an eventual suspension, even partial, of accession negotiations, if Ankara still fails to comply with its obligations", as she said), but, on the contrary, limiting himself only into .. "studying" ways to "help Turkey's efforts" (sic) "by augmenting EU Funds to Turkey, via pre-Accession Aid" even more !

    Rehn appeared satisfied merely by the fact that "EU Commission's envoys visited Turkey on September 2009" in order to "incite the Turkish authorities to make greater efforts to face illegal migration", resulting only in Ankara's acceptance to "re-start again negotiations on re-admission", and to promisse to "accelerate negotiations for an agreement on cooperation with Frontex"...

***