newsitems
CoE asks to Review EU-Turkey Deal on Refugees/Migrants, as Syrian Kurds offer an Alternative (+INTW)
CoE asks to Review EU-Turkey Deal on Refugees/Migrants, as Syrian Kurds offer an Alternative (+INTW)

*Strasbourg/CoE/Angelo Marcopolo/- A Strong Majority in CoE's PanEuropean Assembly Voted Today a Crucial Amendment calling to "Review" the Controversial EU - Turkey Deal on Refugees/Migrants, so that "Alternatives" may be Examined, as CoE's Rapporteur pointed out, shortly before a Real Alternative Solution, Helping Refugees to Stay Safe Near their Country of Origin and be Ready to Return asap, was presented at a CoE Side Esvent by the Co-President of Syrian Democratic Council, (a Syrian-Kurdish Organisation, which cooperates both with USA, Russia and EU against ISIS' Extremist Islamic Terrorists), who explained to "Eurofora" the main thrust of her suggestions in real practice.

That Last-Minute Amendment, adopted with a wide Majority of 102 Votes, against only 20, and 13 Abstentions, asks to "Review (Re--Examine) the EU - Turkey Agreement, in Light of the Criticism by UNHCR, Doctors without Borders, and Amnesty International".
Initialy, its Original Draft, Tabled by a Dozen of MEPs, (represented by Ms Lotta Johnson, from Sweden, and Signed also by German, Greek, Turkish, Cypriot, as well as Danish, Icelandish and Slovenian MEPs, etc), called even to "Cancel" that Controversial EU-Turkey Deal, that anOther CoE Assembly's Resolution, adopted Previously in Strasbourg, had notoriously found Faulted mainly Because "Turkey is Not a Safe Country" for Refugees at all, as the PanEuropean Organisation of Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law, had stressed then, (See f.ex. : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/coeturkeynosafecountryforrefugees.html).
- Indeed, "Turkey is Not a Safe Country, since its State currently Takes Measures against Democracy, (f.ex. the Recent Lift of many Dissident MPs' Immunity, which has already Provoked a Wide OutCry), has an Appalling Situation on Human Rights, and just Killed 8 Syrian Refugees, 4 of them Childtren, last Sunday", MEP Johnsson strongly denounced in this regard.
- However, Today, CoE's Rapporteur on Refugees in Greece, Ms Tineke Strik, a Dutch Socialist, added an Oral SubAmendment Changing the Word "Cancel" by that of "Review (Re-Examine), Argyuing that,even that Previous, Critical PACE Resolution, "Did Not ask to "Cancel"" that Deal, "But had Denounced the Fact that it Raised Serious Human Rights' Concerns". Because "it's Too Early for us to be ready to Cancel" that, "But there are Enough Reasons to Examine if it's in the Right Direction, or if we should Work for Alternatives".
--------------------------------

- It's true that the current Greek Minister on Migration Policy, Ioannis Mouzalas, speaking later to "Eurofora", confirmed that he was obliged to be for the maintain of the Controversial EU -Turkey Deal, however only "in a way which will be in conformity with Human Rights". We (CoE/EU) should better Help Turkey to Respect its Obligations, without exerting undue Pressure, particularly in order to Ensure that the Syrian Migrants who will Return will have have ther elementary Rights respected, he earlier pointed out.
- Because, "I searched, but couldn't find a real Alternative" yet, as Minister Mouzalas told "Eurofora".
Nevertheless, a CoE Side Event, which took place shortly after the above mentioned PACE Plenary Vote, offered a Timely Alternative :
- Sponsored by the President of CoE Assembly's EuroLeft Group, Dutch Senator Tiny Cox, in that Event, experienced German MEP Andrej Hunko introduced Ms Elham Ahmed, Co-President of the Syrian Democratic Council, whsich includes Kurds in Northern Syria region, who notoriously Cooperates Both with Americans and Russians, as well as several European Countries, particularly against Extremist Islamic Terrorists of ISIL's atrocious BeHeaders, even of innocent and defenseless Civilian People. It's only Turkey and ISIL, added to AlQaeda Rebels, who are Against it, and often launch Deadly Attacks on them, even inside Syria.

Ms Ahmed described the Advantages which present, according to her, the Refugee Centers Hosted at that Syrian Kurdish Region, and "Eurofora", observing what had just happened during CoE Assembly's Votes on a Report on Refugees in Greece, (Comp. Supra), asked her to Resume, in Substance, the Main, specific Added Value that this Alternative Solution might have, (Compared to that existing in the Controversial EU-Turkey Deal), so that it would be Examined by EU/CoE nowadays, in the Light of recent developments, as one among the various possible Alternative Solutions.

- She Replied to "Eurofora"s Question mainly by Stressing that "it's Better for Syrian Refugees to be Close to their Homes", Prepared and "Ready to Re-Build up, later-on, their Cities in Safety, and their Communities".
+ Moreover, "We prepare a Culture of Peace", while, on the Contrary, in most Other Areas, Refugees are affected by "a War Psychology", SDC's co-President went on to Add.
- And, concerning particularly "the Young Generations", we Educate them also in their Mother Language of origin, and Grow them up in a way that they can Know their Country and its History, etc., so that we Give them enough Tools in order to be Prepared to Return and Buld up their Cities asap. Something which does not yet exist elsewhere, she concluded in substance.
+ But, Replying Afterwards also to anOther Question by a Collegue Journalist, she Regretted the Fact that, at least until now, "the UN don't seem to be Aware" of the real situation on the spot, and "they didn't Help us", but, on the Contrary, "Left us Alone", instead of "Supporting these Refugee Camps", as they do also with all the Others, (f.ex. inside Turkey, Lebanon, Jordany, etc).
- Meanwhile, some obviously Seek to "Empty the whole Region from Christians and Other Groups", in order to Turn it "Totaly in an Islamic" area, by Perpetrating Terrorist Acts to Drive those Local People Out". So, "we are Afraid that the Region will be Emptied from this "Mosaic" of Peoples and Beliefs, which Risks to be Destroyed", she Warned.
++ In Fact, it all looks as "an Ideological Project", to Impose by Force a "100% Sunni" Mono-Culture, while, on the Contrary, "we Need to have also those Diffferend Religions, which should be Supported by the International Community", she added in Reply to a MEP's subsequent Question. F..ex. Christian Minorities had been Promissed Help, but practicaly Nothing happened yet. Also "Because UNHCR has to Ask the Central Government". F.ex., UNHCR Wanted to Visit a Refugee Camp, but the Turkish Government Claimed that "there was No Security", and they Prevented that", she Denounced, (among various other concrete examples).
Last, but not least, the Syrian Kurdish Political Leader asked also to "Open Access from some Roads for Help", that currently Turkey Blocks, as far as they are concerned, as well as for a Better and Complete Representation of All People of Syria in the stalled Negotiations for Reconciliation and Peace, which are currently Dominated mainly by some Groups with "a Heavy Islamist Agenda" that "Worries us", and who "Don'y really want Peace at all", but, in fact, a perpetuation of Conflicts and "War". This is "a Big Mistake", as she Denounced, which "has to Change".
(../..)
--------------------------------
***
("DraftNews", as already send to "Eurofora"s Subscribers/Donors, earlier. A more accurate, full Final Version might be Published asap).
***
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- Test Photos (f.ex.+ Invit to EU + Korea Peace meeting)
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
Statistics
Visitors: 61817124Archive
Login Form
Other Menu

Facing a 70% Abstention threat in 2009 Election, EU endorses EuroFora's idea for Citizens' debates on crucial EU decisions !
- Different views on "Europe's Future", should be debated among Citizens at June 2009 EU Elections, thanks to political Parties' "Manifestos", says EU Parliament's Report
A main idea, initiated and promoted by EuroFora's founders since 1997: the vital need to develop European Citizens' democratic right to actively participate in multilingual debates on EU decisions, is formally endorsed by the EU from 2009 !
The move is a key attempt to overcome "catastrophic" Polls which warn that only ...30% of Citizens are ready to vote in the forthcoming June 2009 EU Election ! This was revealed by EU Commission's vice-president, in charge of Communication policy, Margot Wallstrom, during a "hot" meeting of EU Parliament's Committee on Culture and Education, during the December 2008 Strasbourg session.
Wallstrom faced criticism, but also suggestions from various MEPs, naturally worried by Abstention threats which herself found even "worse" than in 1999 or 2004...
A Report on "Active Dialogue with Citizens",examined at the same time, presented some useful practical tips, on "facilitating Interviews"; etc., but also a potentialy important call to "incorporate the conclusions of ...debates...into (EU) policies, and take into consideration the expectations that Citizens have of the EU when deciding". An amendment even implies that Citizens' participation in debates on EU decisions is a democratic "Right".
More importantly, it finds that a Debate "on the Future of Europe", (as French President Nicolas Sarkozy has asked since 2007), would be a good idea " for the 2009 European parliamentary Elections", because "clarifying the political differences between the EU political parties would help citizens to identify themselves with, and choose between various concepts", for which "all parties (should) present their Manifesto".
A "Joint political declaration on Communicating Europe in Partnership", co-signed by "the European Parliament, Council and ... Commission", confirms that they "attach the utmost importance to improving communication on EU issues", by "enabling European citizens to exercise their right to participate in the democratic life of the Union, in which decisions are taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizens, observing the principles of pluralism, participation, openness and transparency".
This should "enable Citizens to exercise their right to express their views and to participate actively in the public Debate on European Union issues", while also "promoting the respect of multilingualism". In this regard, EU confirms its "wish to develop synergies with national, regional and local authorities as well as with representatives of Civil Society".
It's since 1997 that a group of EuroFora's founders have officially presented a pioneer Project (then called "EIW", for "Europe in the World"), which aimed to develop Strasbourg's "Polyphonic music", by providing "Interactive information", on "main issues ... during the Decision-making process of European Organizations which engage in Transparent and Public Democratic Debates"
This should be done, inter alia, by "exploring the potential of New Communication Tools (mainly Internet)", as well as classic-form debates, the 1997 EIW pioneer project's anounced in its "Synopsis". It was formally "accepted for evaluation" by EU Commission in Brussels in order to be examined for a grant in the framework of the "Research/Technology/Development (RTD) Programme in the field of Information Technologies", then called "ESPRIT", as a "Best Practice Pilot Project".

But the vital, urgent Political need for EU to search new, efficient ways to reach the People and interact with European Citizens, was really felt in Brussels and elsewhere only after the unprecedented in History 1999 and 2004 Majority Abstention in EU Elections, followed by 3 "NO" in Referenda in France, the Netherlands and Ireland, on 2005 and 2008...
In this New Political Landscape, we prepared a new, actualised and more developed version of our initial idea, in a simplified and more efficient form, thanks also to a large Experience accumulated during many years of EU/CoE/UNO Press work and Multi-lingual debates, with the New project "EuroFora" :
On 2006 we presented in Public its main lines during Questions/Replies that we raised at two Press Conferences by EU Commission President, Jose Baroso, and mainly EU Commission's vice-President, in charge of Communication policy, Margot Wallstrom, together with EU Parliament's vice-president, Alejo Vidal-Quadras, in Strasbourg, (Videos available), and we reminded it at various brief contacts with Commissioner Wallstrom in 2007 and 2008.
Meanwhile, a new Text was also presented for "EuroFora" Project mainly to certain Political and other personalities, at European, National or Regional/Local level, mainly in 2007, but also in 2008..
Now, after the unexpected 2008 Irish "NO", and before the 2009 EU Elections, which are due to be of exceptionally crucial importance for Europe's Future, the moment has obviously come to launch that project, progressively, but in real practice.
Whoever really cares for Europe and its Citizens is welcome to join, in one way or another. Only anti-European, anti-democratic, obscure or ignorant groups might oppose or attempt to "steal" and deviate the main idea.
But European Citizens, incited by enlightened political leaders, are those who will finally write the real History.

















