Crucial week on Concord's trial : Will it check all facts on Runway and Eco-Political Context ?
*Pontoise/4.2.10/- The trial on the responsibilities for Concord's deadly air-crash, which probably had the most far-reaching consequences in Aviation's History, indirectly affecting even Europe's role in the World until today (See infra), risks to continue next week at Pontoise (Paris' North-West : Val d'Oise area), without a certainty yet to clearly establish all the facts on the strange situation that existed at the runway before the fatal lift-off, or to thoroughly examine its economico-political context and what was really at stake, as it is clearly indicated by various facts observed by "EuroFora" on the spot.
After a hasty mention made only Wednesday afternoon (February 3), it seems that it's only from the beginning of next week that theses circunstances, and in particular the apparently strange circumstances around the runway shortly before the fatal flight, might have a chance to be examined by the Court, according to what a Lawyer representing one of the Victims, Me Christian Bousserez, told "EuroFora", confirmed by the "Plan" of the 3 Months-long Hearings shown to "EuroFora" by Judge Prach, in charge of Press relations : Tuesday, February 9, is due to be devoted to the "Preparation of the Flight", as the Court's President confirmed on Thursday, while from Wednesday, February 10, starts the "hot" issue about "the Accident and its Causes", due to unfold during many days.
The July 2000 unprecedented crash of the prestigious Supersonic, TransContinental Franco-British Airplane in Paris killed more than 100 mainly German passengers, all the crew and even more people who stayed at an hotel destroyed by the incident (French). 10 years later, the real cause of this exceptional incident is still strongly disputed.
But the economico-political ramifications of this unusual affair seem even more important : Shortly afterwards, EADS reportedly withdrew its initial Plans from an International air-show exhibition at the UK, while a Press-campaign pushed the French Government (led then by Socialist ex-leader Jospin) to apparently drop plans to develop new High-Tech Supersonic airplanes (civil and/or military), and focus, instead, only into an old project, dated from the 1980ies, to build a simple, low-tech "Local Bus" in Military Transport, whose range was limited only to EU's neighborhood, while also being unable to lift even one (1) modern Tank, too heavy for such an old "cockoo", unable to fly as far as EU's Space-base at Kuru, (French Gyuane), nor to Afghanistan, etc., but costing more than 22 Billions € : The controversial A400M, which has even been seriously delayed since, while its constructors multiply demands for even more money (+ 5,6 Billions € to add in 2010, according to the Press), threatening to abandon it, otherwise. Meanwhile, however, contrary to Europe, who blocked its money to fund A400M's controversial, low-tech project, the USA preferred to invest their money in the creation of a new, ... Supersonic Airplane, able to do Vertical lift-off and even to escape to Radar monitoring : The Joint Fight Striker. In addition, the US keeps its Boeing Globe-Masters, able of heavy TransContinental flights, as well as Russia with Iliouchin and Ukraine with Antonov, while EU countries risk to be limited in a "light" "Local Bus", without any Global ambition, which blocks the greatest amount of Money ever spended in any European project, (more than 25 Billions € !), delaying or condemning many other, much more innovative and ambitious projects, really needed for a Europe able to play an important role in the World, (fex. GALILEO Satellite Navigation System, New Generation AirFighter, Airplane "of the Future", Spatial Early Warning System, etc). At the same time (around 1999-2003), the controversialm A400M old project was also abused as a supplementary argument for those lobbies (most of them notoriously out of the EU) who wanted, in parallel, to push Turkey's controversial EU bid, which provoked an unprecedented blockade and multi-annual delay of EU's Institutional progres, after 3 "NO" in 3 Referenda in France, Holland and Ireland between 2005-2007, continuing also with a series of Popular Votes against Ankara's controversial EU aims in Presidential and Legislative Elections in France (2007), National Elections in Germany (9/2009), and even EU Parliament's Elections on June 2009 in many Member Countries (fex. France, Germany, Austria, Holland, Bulgaria, etc., even in the UK). In brief, the incident appears at least indirectly linked to -or exploited by- big GeoPolitical Debates on Europe's role in the World.
In addition to USA's Continental Airlines (suspected to be responsible for a 45 cm metal strip left at Concord's runway, which could have provoked a series of damages), among the accused are also Contructors and even conceptors of Concord, a notoriously voluntaristic project of the De Gaule - Pompidou era, enlarging considerably the range of questions raised by this unique affair.
However, none of the above mentioned big Economico-Political stakes, apparently surrounding the 7/2000 Concord strange deadly, exceptional crash, isn't mentioned anywhere explicitly , nor even evoked in the current Concord trial files, at least not as far as they are known to the Public, and at least not until now, excepts, perhaps, only indirectly.
More surprisingly, Facts and legitimate Questions inevitably raised about the strange situation that existed at the Runway just before the exceptionally fatal lift-off, apparently don't seem to be explicitly included among the main Topics scheduled to be throroughly examined by the Court during the next few crucial days.
The only witnesses who spoke until now about the situation that existed at the runway before the fatal lift-off were herd by Pontoise's Court only on Wednesday, February 3 : The Date chosen by some Trade Unions for a rare Strike at France's Railroad Company SNCF, which delayed and/or blocked much of the traffic, practically cutting off Pontoise from Paris' center, and hindering or making too cumbersome the circulation of Journalists, most of whom (including "EuroFora") were obliged to give up and stay away. This unfortunate fact regretably limited the Press coverage on this crucial point, curiously provoking a partial "black out".
The Court having no Records of the Hearings due to be made accessible to the Public or even to the Press, as an Official told "EuroFora", people are obliged to be limited only to the few available Press Reports on that point, at least for the moment, according to which, strange Facts surrounded, indeed, the runway, just before the exceptional deadly crash, which provoked (and/or was exploited for) many Economic and Political consequences (See supra) :
Among other facts, it's obviously astonishing that eyewitnesses were surprised to find many Metallic and other pieces thrown at the two sides of the runway, while the required Maintenance check-up had been exceptionally cancelled, because of a ..."Fire-fighting Test" going-on at this precise runway just before the exceptionally fatal lift-off, which notoriously resulted in an unprecedented explosion after a fire whose real origins are controversial..
Such strange Facts are not necessarily "similar to those used by the American Continental Airlines' claim" that the real cause of the fire wouldn't be a damage provoked by a 45 cm long metallic strip fallen from an ACA airplane only a few minutes before Concord's planned flight (according to BEA's main conclusions, apparently adopted by the Attorney), but, on the contrary, an "earlier incident at the runway", contrary to what a collegue Journalist, closely following the Concord process, said afterwards to "EuroFora".
Obviously, even if such an hypothesis might not be excluded a priori, on the contrary, such strange Facts as those which were observed at the runway (See supra), could, eventually, (and in particularly if anyone might have searched to provoke an "accident"), be added to the surprising 45 cm long metal strip fallen from the ACA plane, f.ex. by multiplying such dangerous metallic a.o. objects abandoned at the runway, while also hindering/delaying the required Maintenance operation at the runway which had been initially scheduled to clean-up shortly before the fatal Concord crash, perhaps adding some Inflamatory Chemical substances forgotten by the on-going "Fire-fighting Test", etc., so that the overall result would inevitably be to multiply converging factors whose additional effect augmented the risks of an incident.
Given what was apparently at stake (See supra), nobody could seriously exclude any hypothesis without thoroughly examining all the facts. Certainly not, particularly in front of a Penal Court.
Meanwhile, at the last Hearing of this week, when "EuroFora" was present, the final Witness heard before the week-end, concluded by replying to a general question raised by the Attorney on the "Repairs" eventually due to airplanes, that, according to the rules, the managing Air Compagny had to make any necessary repair, either at its own initiative, or according to the Constructor Industry's advise, if the importance of the repair was greater that a threshhold defined by the technical specifications of any airplane.
Pontoise's "Tribunal Correctionel", located at a distance of more than 1 Hour from Paris' center, inside a new, superbe white marble Building at the top of a Hill with an eye-catching view over Paris, where Airplanes (and even .. FireFighters' cars) often cross a Landscape full of Young College Students, has really an exceptionally important mission to accomplish on the Concord case in order to succeed to help find the Truth and fully establish all relevant Facts in this thorny affair.
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
- PACE President Cox skips Turkey Worst (Occupation) case compared to Russia (DeMilitarisation) query
Statistics
Visitors: 59145926Archive
Login Form
Other Menu
Recent developments proved that Europe can suceed to overcome challenges by aiming at great objectives, and this is needed also in 2009, said EU chairman, French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
- "It's in the name of Great Ideas, Projects, Ambition and Ideals, that EU can overcome" challenges, stressed Sarkozy at EU Parliament in Strasbourg, in conclusion of a dense 7 months EU Chairmanship. "It's even easier for Europe to have Great projects, able to overcome national egoism, instead of limiting itself only to small projects" (unable to do alike), he observed.
- "Europe must remain Ambitious and understand that the World needs her to take Decisions". "The World needs a Strong Europe", which "thinks on its own, has convictions, its own responses, its imagination" : "A Europe which does not limit itself into following" others, (as it did in the Past, when it followed USA, f.ex. on Bosnia). On the contrary, "Europe should undertake its own responsibilities", he said, after a series of succes in stopping the War between Russia and Georgia, and organizing the 1st EuroZone's Summit in Paris, which incited the Washington DC G-20 Summit to extend similar decisions World-wide.
- "When you sweep it all under the carpet, prepare yourself for hard tomorrows", he warned. "What hinders decisions is the lack of Courage and Will, the fading away of Ideals", he stressed before EU Parliament's 2008 debate on Human Rights and Sakharov prize on Freedom of thought attributed by MEPs to Chinese cyber-dissident Hu Jia, followed by an EU - Turkey meeting on Friday.
- "I don't abandon my convictions" and "I will take initiatives" on EU level also in 2009, Sarkozy announced later. "France will not stop having convictions and taking initiatives" on Europe. + "It's an Error to wish to pass over the Heads of those who are elected in their Countries" : "It's an integrism I always fought against"', he warned.
---------------------
French EU Presidency faced 4 unexpected Crisis :
- An institutional crisis, with the Irish "No" to EU Lisbon Treaty, just before it started. A geopolitical crisis, wth the threat of War between Russia and Georgia risking to throw Europe back to Cold-war divisions, on August. A World-wide Financial and Economic crisis, arriving at a bad moment before crucial 2009 EU elections. And even a Strasbourg's mini-crisis, with EU Parliament's roof curiously falling down, from unknown reasons, in a brand new building on August, provoking an unprecedented transfert of the 2 September Plenary Sessions...
But it wasn't enough to stop Sarkozy ! On the contrary, it stimulated him...
---------------------------------------
- "The better way to deal with the recent problems of EU institutions (as the "3 NO" by France, the Netherlands and Ireland) is to take them as a "Test" in order to find solutions closer to Citizens' concerns", said later in Strasbourg Sarkozy's new choice as Ministe for EU affairs, Bruno Le Maire.
- On the Institutional front, Sarkozy gave Time to the Irish to think about it, and stroke on December a deal including a New Referendum after the June 2009 EU Elections, in exchange of a promise to keep the rule of "one EU Commissioner for each EU Member Country", and some opt-outs on Defence and Fiscal EU policies, Abortion, etc. If the Irish get a "Yes" Majority, then the institutional package could be completed in 2010 or 2011 on the occasion of Croatia's probable EU accession.
He was accused in Strasbourg to upgrade EU Council and downgrade EU Commision, but he replied that "strong Political initiatives by EU Council reinforce also the more technical role of EU Commission, under the political-technical leadership of its President", all 3 "working together with EU Parliament".
- But, meanwhile, Sarkozy energetically spearheaded an Historic 1st Summit of EuroZone's 15 Heads of State and Government at EU's core, exceptionally enlarged to a partial participation of British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, on October 12 in Paris' Elysee palace, which started to tackle succesfully the growing world Financial crisis.
It also paved the way for its endorsement by a subsequent Brussels' 27 EU Member States' gathering, before it all come to Washington's G-20 Summit. And "Europe was united, it asked for the 1st G-20 Summit, and it will also organise the next G-20 Summit on April in London", he observed.
But a Conference with EU, Russia, African and other Developing Countries, hosted in Strasbourg shortly after Washington G-20 Summit by the French EU Presidency, took a Resolution asking to enlarge participation to Global Economic Governance. Many found, indeed, illogic and unacceptable that f.ex. states as Turkey were given a seat at G-20 level, while all African Countries, and even the African Union itself, representing the greatest Continent on Earth, were excluded...
Meanwhile, even USA''s "Paulson No 3" Plan, was, in fact, inspired by Europe's No 1 Plan", Sarkozy observed, largelly applauded by MEPs.
And "Europe showed Solidarity" by mobilizing some 22 Billion credit for Hungary, 1,7 billion for Ukraine, as we do nowadays for Baltic States, etc., he added.
The move on Economy was extended on December by an EU stimulus' plan totalling some 200 billion Euros, including 5 Billions released by EU Commission for big Projects, as well as various parallel National plans for Economic revival, (fex. 26 billions in France alone). They might appear limited, compared to USA President-elect Obama's reported plan to boost the American economy with 800 billion $, but at least succeded to overcome Europe's divisions for the first time on Economic governance, opening new horizons.
- The French President stressed even harder the unique role of an active EU Council's chairmanship, when he moved swiftly and efficiently, at the beginning of August, to succesfully stop War between Russia and Georgia, at the last minute, which threatened to bring Europe back to Cold War division.
"We (EU) also wanted to avoid a situation like in Bosnia, in the Past, when EU was absent, so that our American friends took their responsibilitues, and EU only followed", despite the fact that the conflict took place in Europe. Now, it was the EU who took its responsibilities".
A roadmap towards a new PanEuropean Security policy, before which all unilateral moves to place new Missiles (from USA or Russia) would be freezed, was proposed by Sarkozy after a meeting with Russian president Medvedev, at the eve of Washington DC's G-20 Summit.
Ukraine's "European" character was stressed at a Sarkozy - Jushenko Summit, September in Paris, while EU adopted on December an "Eastern policy", in which, "I'm convinced that our (EU's) future is to find with our Neighbours the conditions for Economic Development. Peace and Security, by explaining them that.. they must respect (Human Rights') Values, and adopt behaviors different from the Past", explained Sarkozy in Strasbourg.
Meanwhile, the "Union for the Mediterranean" was created, since July's Summit if 45 Heads of State and Government in Paris, as "an organisation for a permanent Dialogue, that we need", mainly in order to tackle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, by bringing together, for the 1st time, Israelis and Arabs, where "Europe must be present, in order to avoid a frontal clash".
- "If Europe doesn't take its part for Peace in the Middle-East, nobody else will do that in our place", Sarkozy stressed.
-----------------------
Meanwhile, other EU Agreements were brokered during the French EU Presidency on Immigration, (fex. common Asylum rules, etc), and Climat- Energy :
- On Climat-Energy, the 2007 German EU Presidency had fixed a triple 20% aim for 2020 (20% renewable Energies, 20% reduction of CO2 emmission, 20% energy efficience/economies), and the 2008 French EU Presidecny realized that, making the necessary compromises in order to modernize EU's industry, but without throwing some former Central-Eastern European Countries into abrupt Economic break down risking "social explosion".
- Defence-Security EU policy was mainly postponed for April 2009, since both German chancellor Merkel and French president Sarkozy want to strike a deal with the new American president Obama in Strasbourg's NATO Summit.
However, with all these 4 unexpected Crisis diverting attention to other urgencies, People wil wonder now, what happened to the famous deal proposed by freshly-elected French President Sarkozy on Turkey's controversial EU bid, back on August 2007, to continue EU - Turkey negotiations, but on the double condition that core chapters, intrinsequally linked with EU Membership, will be excluded, and that a collective Reflexion and Debate on Europe's future would start before the end of 2008.
It was meant to reply to the crucial question : What kind of Europe do we want in 10 or 20 Years from now : A large Market, or a Political Europe, with a popular identity ? In Sarkozy's thinking, presented in his 2 landmark speeches on Europe in Strasbourg, shortly before and after the 2007 Elections, (on February and July 2007), Turkey's controversial EU bid would be incompatible with the second choice.
It's true that EU Commision's Chairman, Jose Barroso, (who had notoriously declared, as former Portuguese Prime Minister, that he found "nonsense" the idea that Europe might become equal to the US), had repeatedly tried to avoid that Sarkozy's criticism on Turkey might start winning a larger audience in Europe, preferring a discrete "wismens' committee" work. And that most of the personalities later chosen in order to participate in a Committee on Europe's Future, are too much linked with Socialist parties and/or American policies, to be really critical of USA's notorious wish to impose Turkey to the EU, as Sarkozy had noted himself since March 2007..
- "It's on EU Council's presidency to take political initiatives. EU Commission has other competences", stressed Sarkozy. The "European Ideal" is to "build Europe with the States, not against them". "Ask Europeans to chose between their countries and Europe won't work. You don't choose between your two parents : We must add them together".
"France and Germany have an Historic Duty to work together, precisely because of what happened to the Past. We have to work hand by hand. We cannot be separated.It goes beyond me and Mrs Merkel today, Mr Schroeder and Mr. Chirac yesterday. It's not a choice, it's a duty to Europe and to the World". "We need Germany, as Germany needs Europe". Compromise is inevitable, here as everywhere, and each one made some steps towards eachother's positions.
But "it's true that Mrs Merkel didn't chose her Socialist partners, while I chose mine", Sarkozy said, in an indirect hint that the Socialist Minister of Finance in Germany might be a cause of minor past disagreements in Economy, which were overcome in recent negotiations.
"We (France and Germany) have particular duties in Europe", but "in a Europe of 27 Member States, it's not enough for France and Germany to agree between them.
"I always thought that Great Britain has a special role to play in Europe. ... Now, everybody "saw what it cost payed the UK for having been too exclusively open towards the US (and) Financial services. Europe needs the UK, but also the UK needs Europe" :- "We were able to face the hardest moment of the Financial crisis because the UK clearly chose Europe", stressed Sarkozy, reminding Gordon Brown's exceptional participation to the Historic 1st Heads of State/Government Summit of EuroZone, October 12 in Paris (See EuroFora's Reportage from Elysee Palace then).
- "Some look at Europe with old glasses aged 30 years ago. While we must look at her in relation to what it will be in 30 years" in the Future, Sarkozy concluded.