english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Next G8 Chair France Stimulus Minister Devedjian to EuroFora:2009-2010 Result+2011 Hope=Save+Invest!

Next G8 Chair France Stimulus Minister Devedjian to EuroFora:2009-2010 Result+2011 Hope=Save+Invest!

Written by ACM
Monday, 28 June 2010
imag0750_400

Speaking shortly after the G8 Global Governance Summit at Huntsville (Canada) followed by the G20 at Toronto debate on how to Reduce Expenses but augment Growth, the 2011 G8 and G20+ Chairman, French President Sarkozy's close collaborator and Stimulus Minister, Patrick Devedjian, replied to "EuroFora"'s Questions by stressing that 2009-2010's results open hopes for 2011, if rigorous savings on current expenses are associated with vigorous investments.

 -  "EuroFora" questioned Devedjian on the "Timing" of the various Economic Stimulus actions, and "how they'll evolve", "in relation to the current Debate, on European and Global level (G 8), on required Economies, but also about Growth".

- "In fact, you are questioning, implicitly, how the debate on overcoming the difficulties to Control Public Spending, could be Compatible with the (Economic) Stimulus", observed the key French Minister.

- "I think that Public Spending should, naturally, be considered Globally, but it should also be considered more Precisely (analytically) : There are two, absolutely Differend Kinds of Public Spending : On Investments, ...and on Current (Operational) expenses (on Functioning), i.e. about the everyday way of life".

- "Our Moto should be : <<Rigour in Functioning, Vigour for Investment !>>, Devedjian stressed.

- "I.e., the Investment (Public) Spending generates Growth. And this is needed, because otherwise, there will be No Growth, since the Private Investment has, globally, stalled. So that, provisionally, it's the Public Spending which takes over".


- "Afterwards, there is also the Spending for the Functioning, which is often too Heavy and Sterile, even if it's Necessary from certain points of view. But, when some Luxurius Habits have been taken, this results, sometimes,  in an excessively High Cost for our (French Public) Administration", he observed.

- "F.ex., last week, I went to Higher Normandy (Region). The Prefect of Maritime Seine and High Normandy, was talented enough to apply what we call the "RGPP", i.e. the General Review of Public Policies, on his own Prefectoral Administration, which had been, since a remote Past, dispersed in 17 different locations.

(But), "since 2007, this Prefect, ...meticulously took care to rationalze his Administration". This was done "also according to the Directives given by the Government, which prove that, this Control of Public Spending is not something that we have just discovered, but was already included in the (French) Government's Program since 2007", he noted smiling.

- "And those seventeen (17) locations, at differend areas, were reduced and regrouped into just four (4) locations. Obviously, from this point of view, the Public Spending on Functioning (current expenses) was reduced, the Administrations operated better by organizing a Synergy, (something which isn't done simply by striking fingers and putting everything in the same box, because this regrouping represents a lot of work).

 - "This shows exactly what should be done by Controlling Public Expenditure : Eliminate the unnecessary expenses, which are often there.  So that, "in this way, we can Spare Unecessary, Sterile Expenses, and, at the same time, Invest"

- "The example I gave at a "Micro" level, is part of a General Governemental Policy, symbolized by 2 aspects :"

- From one side, "the (Economic) Stimulus Plan, and the Great Loan ("Grand Emprunt"), for Investments, in order to win a part of Growth". "And", on the other side, "the Policy of Controlling Public Expenditure, in order to reduce Current expenses on functioning", as "this had already been planned since 2007", he concluded.

deve_close_400_01

Meanwhile, the first Results of the Economic Stimulus Plan in France indicate its "Efficiency" with a probable Growth of more than + 4% GDP between 2009 - 2010 :

 -  "The French Recession back in 2009 was the Smallest in Europe :  Less than - 2,5%. In comparison, Germany (the Richest EU country), had a 2009 Recession of  - 4,9%, i.e. almost the Double", the Minister reminded.


- "And our Forecasts for 2010 Growth are + 1,5 %. "This is, certainly, not enough yet, in order to create many new Jobs, but, compared to the Past : i.e.  - 2,5% in 2009, up to +1,5% in 2010, it represents an amelioration of + 4 %", he observed.

- Therefore, "we also have many Hopes for 2011", Devedjian added, speaking earlier to a group of Journalists including "EuroFora", near Strasbourg

Indeed, the "Stimulus Plan had 2 main Aims : At first, to face the Global Crisis, in order to create a Positive "Counter Effect" against the Recession. .. The 2nd aim is that the Money is not only used to simply react, but also in view of the greatest possible Economic Efficiency, .. in order not only to fil an endless gap, but also generate Growth", he explained.
------------------------------------

About 4,5 Billions € remain available to be invested in the following 6 Months, until the end of 2010, by the French Stimulus Plan :

 - Out of about 39 Billions € in all made available for 2009-2010, some 34,5 Billions € have been already injected in the Economy.  "The Budget which had been voted was for 2 Years : I.e. it ends on December, 31" of 2010, observed Devedjian, who had visited Strasbourg right away when he started, (i.e. on December 29, 2008 : See relevant Statements given then in reply to "EuroFora"s questions).

imag0728_400
 
Symbolically, Devedjian spoke after visiting a Factory located near Strasbourg whose products "can serve directly Citizens and Businesses with Energy from Gas, even if they are not connected at a stable Urban pipe network", as he observed in reply to an earlier "EuroFora"'s question, considering in particular a mainly Rural space.


"Liquefied Gas International" (GLI in the French version), is a Leader in France, Europe and neighbouring Countries, from the U.K., Germany, Italy, Spain, Croatia and Serbia, up to Moroco, Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Syria and Saudi Arabia, etc, on Liquefied Petrol Gas (LPG) recipients, (with competitors only from Portugal and Turkey)..

GLI's President, Francois Hamy, speaking later to "EuroFora", observed that forthcoming Developments to boost Liquefied Gas Transport, including by Sea, River, etc, "will End up in our Bottles", thereby augmenting this Industry's production of Liquefied Gas' Bottles, Containers, etc. Current Production Speed is "one (Gas) Bottle in 4,5 Seconds, i.e. 800 Bottles in 1 Hour".

Moreover, by specializing in Gas produced from Oil (Liquefied Petrol Gas : LPG), GLI International reportedly has also some "Big Industrial Projects", partly "linked to Renewable Energy" Innovative Projects, which may augment its turn over for several Tens of Millions € more.  LPG can, indeed, be used also mixed with Solar and other renewables.


The move topically coincides with experienced Professor Jacques Amouroux's recent statements to "EuroFora" on the huge potential of CO2-produced Methanol and other Gas Energy for Industry, Cars and Power, often transported in Containers, Bottles, etc., which could give a boost to Europe's "Energy Independence".

In addition, LPG Gas can also boost a new, cheap and more environment-friendly Energy for Cars, according to a specialized Association,  which could become of large importance, since it seems too expensive to really transform all EU's cars in Electric ones during the foreseeable future, as Professor Amouroux has calculated.

 (See recent DraftNews already sent to Donors/Subscribers, which will be completed with an extenso full Interview and much more concrete details on that interesting issue, which is due to be examined at a forthcoming EU Conference in Poland).

Such "excellent perspectives" serve also to better highlight, by illustrating with concrete examples and making even more clear Devedjian's focus on spending only in Productive Investment able to generate more Growth.

***
EuroStars-Eureka

Statistics

Visitors: 62698698

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 bisky_center_400
 

Former "Green-Red" German government's Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's job at the controversial Turkish pipeline "Nabucco" was denounced as "not proper", "very bad", and "incompatible with Democracy", by the new President of EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group, German Lothar Bisky, replying to an "EuroFora" question.

For once, criticism of Joschka Fischer's doings with Turkey affecting Europe, didn't come only from the Center-Right of the political spectrum, but even from his Left side : The experienced Bisky, who has been chairing all over 1993-2009 the PDS - Die Linke party :  

- "Former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer got involved in dealings with oil-gaz business in a foreign country, Turkey, and its controversial Nabucco pipeline. This raises questions about Democracy, also because of the well known problems of Human Rights violations in that country. Do you thing that this might be abused in order to cover up and close EU's eyes on Human Rights violations ?", "EuroFora" asked Bisky.

imag0025_400_01

- "Nabucco pipeline is (only) at the planning stage". And "there are some difficulties",  he observed from the start. But "'I don't want to get into the details of Nabucco pipeline, because I don't think that there is any point for it at the moment".
 
At any case,  "we  (EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group) strongly believe that Politicians should not get involved in the Energy Business, and all these commercial transactions", President Bisky declared on the Joschka Fiischer's affair.

- "We feel that it's something that shouldn't be done. It's not proper !"           

- "We don't think that it's compatible with Democracy either, and it gets politics into a very Bad track", Bisky went on to denounce.
                                                                                                                                                                        
- "EuroLeft  and "Die Linke" always spoke against that, saying that politicians should not get directly into the arms of private enterprises"

- "It is pretty bad if a former Minister takes a job f.ex. in a major Energy producer. So, it's an issue if a Minister who may have seen excellent opportunities, subsequently gets personally grasp of them, in very serious parts of the economy, once he has given up his (Government) job."

- "It doesn't really make politics in general look any better'", Bisky concluded.

imag0935_400

Earlier, this week in Strasbourg, other Journalists had also raised critical questions on former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's involvement in the conroversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline to the President of his own EuroParty : Kohn-Bendit of the "Greens", who, contrary to Bisky, tried to find excuses for Fischer, while criticizing his long-time partner, Schroeder for having done a similar move :

- "Shroeder was chancellor", and he "negociated" with "Russians", who gave him a job only "3 Months" after he resigned from the Government. While "Joschka Fischer", on the contrary, got a job with the controversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline only "4 Years after" he left the Government. "He didn't negociate Nabucco", so I have "no objection", Kohn Bendit claimed.

But, many Facts indicate the contrary :

Joschka Fischer was Foreign Minister in Germany from 1999 up to 2005 : I.e. from the year that EU took the controversial decision to give Turkey a "Candidate" status, until he year it started controversial "accession negotiations, (later declared "open-ended" after Sarkozy-Merkel's arrival from 2005-2007).

During that period was prepared the controversial so-called "Annan" Plan (in fact, drafted by others and attributed afterwards to the former UN SG) on Cyprus, which failed after a Popular Referendum said "No" on 2004 with a large Majoriy of 3/4 : 75%. Mainly because it was criticized for making too much concessions to the Turkish side :  Particularly by restricting Greek Cypriot Refugees' Human Right to return to their ancestral Land and/or get restitution of their Familiy Homes and private properties, usurpated by Ankara's Army since the 1974 militay invasion and continuing occupation of the northern part of Cyprus. And by weakening the Central Government, leaving to 2 "constituent States" so much powers and separate interests that more conflicts appeared inevitable, provoking the danger of a break-down in the foreseable future, with more crisis, troubles, perhaps bloodshed, etc., instead of creating an harmoniously integrated, really one federal State.

The controversial Plan was finalized on March-April 2004 at Burgenstock (Switzerland), curiously in the presence of an Envoy by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Germany, then governed by Joschka Fischer, but in the absence of a French and not even an European Union's Envoy, contrary to what was usually practiced on similar occasions in Switzerland (fex. in 1997 at Montreux, in 2000 at Geneva, etc).

Turkey notoriously exploited the failure of the "Annan" Plan in order to convince the EU to decide to start accession Negotiations on December 2004. This provoked an unprecedented series of Institutional Crisis inside the EU, shortly afterwards, when French and Dutch People rejected, 2 popular EuroReferenda by a majority "'No" vote to the EU Constitutional Treaty on 2005, aggraveted in 2004 a Majority Abstention to EU Elections, etc., followed by the recent Irish "No", etc.

"Nabucco" Gas pipeline was notoriously planned since ..2002. It follows an even earlier idea, for an Oil pipeline Baku-Ceyhun, which started to be prepared on 1999-2001 and was meanwhile recently completed.  

So, facts indicate that what is now at stake is based on decisions made during Joschka Fischer's term as former Foreign Minister, closely interested in Turkey's controversial EU-bid.

To the point that he now practically ...switched jobs with a poliician from Turkey, (the State which pays today openly Joschka Fischer), Mr. Ozdemir, who came earlier in Germany, got fast the nationality, and became EiuroMP in a few years, continuing now as head of the "Greens" in Germany, i.e. in Joschka's former job !...

Such astonishing facts risk, unfotunately, to give to German politician Lothar Bisky's criticism of  representative Democracy a topical meaning :

 - "We (EuroLeft Group) think that what is really at stake is Democracy. It's not only about Gas Pipelines or Energy sources", President Lothar Bisky went on to add in his reply to "EuroFora"'s question on Joscka Fischer's personal interests in the controversial Turkish "Nabuco" pipeline.

Such facts, "make People get more distance from Politics. ...People had had enough, and they are fed up !".

- "That's why we (EuroParliament's "EuroLeft" Group) want to strengthen Direct Democracy in Europe. Citizens should be involved in the (EU) Decision-making. In the end of the day, it's not going to help anyone if Politicians are always taking decisions, without involving Citizens. We want to give a voice to the People of Europe. They've got to have their say in the decisions that are taken. That's one of our absolutely fixed and steadfast views. We want more Direct Democracy in Europe. That's how it can become more effective and stronger", he concluded.

***





-

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING