ECHR slams oppressive+sly attempt to Split a Family of Political Dissidents by Years of Separation
*Strasbourg/- Sly attempts, by some previous Governments notoriously linked to the Turkish Oppressive regime, to "Split a Family" of Political Dissidents, both by Force and by a viciously Discriminatory Treatment which Separated the Members of that Family between them for 5 Years, resulting in a situation where they were practicaly Hindered even to See eachother and maintain direct Contacts, except only by "Visits" to far away Countries, Distant for many Thousands of Kms between them, (See Infra), were strongly Condemned Today in Strasbourg, by an Unanimous ECHR's Judgement, as blatant Violations of the Human Right to Respect of Family life.
The case concerned a Kurdish Family with Children, who had been obliged to "Flee Turkey", since "1993", after the Father, "a Mechanics and Professional Driver", who "Sympathised with the PKK", (even without having participated to it), "like may other Members of his Family", as f.ex. his "Older Brother" who had "obtained (Political) Asylum" in Europe, "felt Persecuted by Turkish Authorities", in "Several occurances", "because" he had allegedly "Assisted the PKK", and "Feared for his Life", so that, after "Violent Conflicts between Turkish Authorities and Kurdish People in 1992 and 1993", (notoriously Brutal), "found Necessary" to seek Asylum both for himself and his Family in Norway, after "spending a period as Refugees in Iraq", "after his Parent's House" at "Sirnak City", where he had left his Wife, "was set on Fire" and Burned down, (as many other Kurdish Dissidents' Homes destroyed by the Turkish Militay and/of its infamous "Village Guards", most probably in the framework of Turkish Government's "Scorched Earth" policies, that an abundant ECHR's case-law has already revealed in Strasbourg since 1995-1996 : Comp. f.ex. the famous "Akdivar" affair), as it results from the outset at Today's Judgement.
----------------------
Following an "older Brother" who had already been obliged to flee away from Turkey and "obtained (Political) Asylum in Denmark", as early as since 1988, Both Husband and Wife of the Dissident Family, and their 2 first Children came in Norway, where they gave Birth to a 3rd Child, during previous ChristianDemocrat Governments (known as "Bondevic 1 and II Governments), between 1998 and 2005. Meanwhile, the Father, who had preceded and prepared the way for his Family to join him, after working (even irregularly) for years in Norway, had even dared face an imprisonment of 1 Month when he reacted to the "Serious Insults against his Family", which had been uttered by another Man, who had also "Provoked" the Dissident Head of Family, particularly "by Hitting his Face", etc., before the victim was obliged to reply by inflicting a "not considerable" "injury" to the "shoulder" of the aggressor, who had later "Withdrawn" a "complaint" against Kaplan, as Norwegian Courts' had, (according to ECHR's judgement), already found back on 1999.
But, suddenly, from the 1st Year of a "Socialist" past Government, (known as "Soltenberg II Government"), on November 2006, the Husband of the Family of Political Dissidents opposed to the notoriously Oppressive Turkish Government, was astonishingly "ordered" to be "Expelled" to Turkey, and his re-entry in Norway Prohibited for an Indefinite duration ! + Moreover, he was immediately (in the next 2 Days !) Arrested and Detained for 2 Weeks. The Worse incident took place on 2011, when after his appeals to the local Courts were Rejected on 2010, finaly, the Head of that dissident Kurdish Family was effectively Expelled by force to Turkey during the Summer, shortly after former Foreign Minister of Norway, "Socialist" Jonas Gahr Store, had visited Ankara to meet there Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoglu back on the Spring of that same year, (followed even by a subsequent Davutoglu visit to Norway at that same crucial Month of July 2011, at another occasion).
---------------------------
However, Today, on July 2014, i.e. only Months after the new ChristianDemocrat/Rightist Government won the late 2013 National Elections in Norway, that Kurdish Dissident finaly won his case at the ECHR in Strasbourg, which found that the former "Socialist" Government's overall negative behavior had Violated the Human Right to Family (Art. 8 of the PanEuropean HR Convention) vis a vis both the expelled Father, and his Wife, as well as their 3 Children, awarding them a relevant Financial Compensation as Victims. Significantly, the new, ChristianDemocrat/Rightist Government of Norway had openly decided not even to contest at all the amounts of Money for Reparation of Damages and Costs that the Victims' Lawyer had asked from the ECHR.
-------------------------------
It's interesting to note that ECHR, exceptionaly observes Critically also the fact that that former "Socialist" Government, curiously, without any known serious reason, imposed a Discriminatory Treatment among the members of that same Family, by granting a Residence (and even a Work permit) only to the Wife (10 Years Younger than her Husband) and their Children, as well as Norwegian Citizenship, ...both shortly before and after Expelling her Husband alone to Turkey !However, there was "No .. Obstacle preventing" them "to Accompagny" the Father "if the Familly resettled" back in the Country of its origin, EuroJudges observed, critcizing the induced separation.
=> Euro-Judges, therefore, concluded that, in fact, "the competent Authorities Expected that the Family would be Split", as Today's ECHR Judgement explicitly denounces.
- And that "Family Split" would be provoked "as a Result of the Expulsion" of the Father, "at least .. for a 5 Years Period, during which" his Children and Wife were practicaly "Prevented from Seing him, other than by Visiting him", (i.e. as .. Tourists, instead of living anew all together as a united Family), ECHR's Judgement critically observes.
- "However", this "does Not appear to have .... Reasons .. Sufficient to show that the Disputed Interference", by the former "Socialist" Norwegian Government, in the Victims' Human Right to their Family life, might have "Sufficient Reasons" in order "to show that the disputed Interference was Necessary" at the present case, ECHR found.
- In particular, ECHR explained that among "Factors to be taken into Account, ... are the Extend to which Family Life is effectively Ruptured, ...the Ties in the (Host) State, ... Obstacles in the way of the Family living in the Country of Origin, .. and whether Family Life was Created at a Time when (they) were Aware (of a).. Precarious" "status of one of them", as well as the degree of eventual "considerations of Public Order".
=> In consequence, "having regard to all of the above considerations, and "Notablly" the "Long-lasting Bonds", as well as the "special Care Needs", particularly between a "Child" and "her Father", but also "the Long Period ...before the immigration Authorities ....order his Expulsion with a re-entry Ban", ECHR was "Not convinced", "Nor Satisfied that the Authorities" stroke "a Fair Balance" between that Father's "Need to ... Remain" in the Country where his Family was, "in order to Maintain his Contact", (particularly "with his Daughter"), and, "on the other hand", "the Interests of ... the Country", (f.ex. on "Economy", Public Order, etc), "according to the Government"'s claims.
EuroJudges clearly Rejected, in particular, an obviously Scandalous claim that an imposed Separation "for 5 Years did not.. involve a permanent Splitting up of the Family", since the expulsion imposed by the former "Socialist" Government "would Expire in July 2016"...
>>> In fact, the Father's "Expulsion.. with a 5 Year re-entry Ban", (which had been decided and executed by force from the Past, "Socialist" former Government of Norway, even if it had been, meanwhile reduced from an initially .. "Indefinite Duration" : Comp. Supra), "entailed a Violation of Article 8 of the (PanEuropean) Convention" on Human Rights, which protects the "right to respect of Family life", ECHR's Judgement Denounced "Unanimously". Condemning the respondent State to pay a Just Satisfaction for non-pecuniary Damages and all the Legal Costs of the procedure to the Victims.
In the present case, the Family of Kamran and Naime Kaplan, with their 3 Children, was United by Fighting Together a Hard Battle, (including by lodging a Collective Complaint to the ECHR signed by all of them), until they Won it, 3 Years after they had been Obliged to be Separated against their real Free Will, by a series of imposed circumstances which did not depend on them, most probably targetted because of their Political Opposition to a notoriously Oppressive Foreign Regime out of Europe.
------------
Various other Brutal and/or Sly, Vicious covert Attempts by Oppressive regimes to "Split the Family" of Political Dissidents, have become Notorious World-wide by the Humanistic and Compative Denonciation made by World-Famous American Actor and Film Director Charlie Chaplin against "Cold War" McCarthism's Witch-Hunt, at his landmark Artistic masterpiece film "A King in New York", with which he said "good buy" to the U.S. of that period, preferring to live self-Exiled in Europe since 1952.
Chaplin's masterpiece notoriously pictured the scandal about a Kid of Political Dissidents, whose initialy Honest, Strong and Intelligent Personality was practicaly Destroyed by that Oppressive era's scandalously intrusive USA State Agents, who pushed him even to Betray his own Mother and Father, as well as their closest Friends. Such Tragic Scenarios convinced Chaplin to definitively go away from the McCarthist USA of the "Cold War" era, and produced that Film in France, where it was Hindered to be published but only 5 Years later at the UK (on 1957), while in the USA it wasn't authorized before the 1970ies...
-----------------------------
In fact, this was the Opposite from anOther, also Famous, landmark Film : - The Historic, 1948 Masterpiece by Joseph Losey : "The Boy with Green Hair", on an Orphan of War, which was reportedly inspired, on the contrary, by the Human and Combative Honesty of another Couple of simple but conscious American Citizens, who undertook, during that same Difficult "McCarthy" period, to welcome as one of their own Children, protect and raise a fragile Child of a Political Dissidents' Family, as that of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, the couple of a Scientist notoriously slandered, arrested, condemned, and killed by execution in one of the Worst moments of "Cold War" McCarthysm on 1953, because they were suspected to have revealed the secret of the Nuclear Bomb, after the Hiroshima-Nahashaki horrible Massacre of innocent Civilian People by a USA Military Airplane's bombing in Japan, also to the Russians a.o., in order to saveguard a Balance of powers Worldwide, (instead of unilateral Domination only by one side), able to guarantee Peaceful "Detente" for Decades :
Something that they strongly Denied, admitting to have discussed certain other issues, but not that much, with pro-Russian links, in the Court proceedings which resulted in what was rightfully named as "the most Controversial Execution in USA's History", and was later denounced also by the killed Dissidents' own Son : Robert Meeropol, who had the chance to be protected and raised by a Family of Friends noble enough to let the boy learn all the Truth about his killed Father and Mother, and be Proud of them, as he's proven, inter alia, also by his own Book, published in the Memory of his Parents, that Rosenberge's son wants to use even Today in order to Defend Freedom of Speech and Information, (f.ex in the "Wikileaks" case on the Persecution of Asange, etc : http://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/30/son_of_julius_and_ethel_rosenberg ).
--------------------------------------------
Even the current Prime Minister of France, Manuel Valls, himself of Spanish origin, in his 1st official Visit in Strasbourg, as former Minister of Interior (JHA), back on July 2012, who had been reportedly send here directly after speaking with French President Francois Hollande during a Governemental visit at Marseille, in order to inaugurate a Monument and participate at the award of the Prize of People of "Justice", (supported by famous former EU Parliament's President, Academician Simone Veil : Comp. Veil's Statements to "EuroFora" at a prestigious Sorbone University's Conference on 2010 in Paris, already sent earlier to Subscribers/Donors, as well as from former long-time French President Jacques Chirac, both included among those honored by that Monument, symbolically erected right there where Strasbourg's Historic Synagogue was located, before being Destroyed and burned down during the NAZI Military Occupation, at nowadays' "Place des Halles"), had stressed the importance of safeguarding the Memory of Horrible Crimes, but also of People who dared struggle against them, in order to save other Fellow Humans' Freedom and/or Lives, so that we can hope to prevent and/or avoid the repetition of any such, similar or even worse Crime against Humanity both in the Present and in Future, (Comp. Valls' reply to "EuroFora"s Question then, already sent to Subscribers/Donors earlier).
This was done on the occasion of that Prize's award particularly to a couple of Alsacian People who had hidden among their own Children, protected and raised, the then Baby Daughter of a Resistant Jewish Family, where the Father and Mother had been obliged to Emigrate elsewhere because of NAZI's persecution , entrusting their Children to a few such Honest and Brave People, who were willing and able to transmit the History of those persecuted Parents to their Children, in order to keep them United, even after that Family's forced Separation : Their small Girl, who had been saved and kept aware of her Father and Mother's Heroic Struggle, was present at that 2012 Prize Award Ceremony in Strasbourg, a noble Old Lady now, but, still submerged by strong Emotion, even more than Half a Century after those Tragic Events, she kindly asked to forgive her for still feeling so moved, by those Memories, that she couldn't realy speak in front of a numerous public.
------------------------------------------------------
***
("DraftNews", as already sent to "EuroFora"s Subscribers/Donors, earlier. A more accurate, full Final Version might be published asap).
***
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
- PACE President Cox skips Turkey Worst (Occupation) case compared to Russia (DeMilitarisation) query
Statistics
Visitors: 59054276Archive
Login Form
Other Menu
They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------
CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment
Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :
A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.
"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...
Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.
Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..
Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...
Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.
But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..
Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..
"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.
- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.
- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock
"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"
PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.
Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...