ECHR President Spielman to EuroFora: EU entry to ECHR to boost Citizens' Rights => +EU Integration ?
*Strasbourg/ENA/Angelo Marcopolo/- The forthcoming EU Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights can strengthen EU Citizens' Rights and thus Stimulate Popular Support for more and better European Integration, agreed in substance, ECHR's President, Dean Spielmann, in reply to a relevant "EuroFora"'s Question.
- "EuroFora" had asked Spielman if he believed that, a Political advantage for Europe could be to help face the current need to urgently fil the notorious Gap still existing between EU Citizens and EU Institutions, by the forthcoming EU Accession to the ECHR, as long as this would ameliorate the respect of EU Citizens' Human Rights by all concerned Bureaucracies, so that their own Feelings vis a vis EU Integration could be Stimulated and gain a new Momentum, able to bring some badly neeeded Fresh Popular Support to the European Edification in the foreseeable Future.
- "Yes, certainly !", replied positively ECHR's President to "EuroFora"s question.
+ "I am Convinced about that", President Spielmann stressed in addition.
- In this regard, "what we need, at the Highest Political Level, are Personalities who have a certain View ("Vision"), he pointed out earlier.
- Because "there are certainly important political stakes in the (current) system of EU Integration (in itself), but we shouldn't lose sight also of a Political Vision which safeguards the level of Human Rights, particularly in some very Technical issues, which have a great Impact in everyday life", he Warned
=> "Instead of getting lost amidst the Daily Details of an "efficiency" at Short term, we must also take a Higher look and have a certain Vision at the Horizon", he advised, reacting also to another, relevant Critical observation made by another EuroJudge, who had complained of the fact that, some EU Officials often look at the EU as an "Efficient" Mechanism, while, on the contrary, they take CoE and ECHR rather as something which might Divert them from their main tasks, as he said.
Spielmann was speaking Yesterday (Thursday) Evening at a Conference-Debate, co-organized by the CoE and ENA, the prestigious French Higher School for Senior Officials of State and/or European/International Governance, at its Headquarters in Strasbourg, on the occasion of the Publiction of a Book on "EU's Accession to the ECHR", by the PanEuropean Court's Grand Chamber's Registrar, Johan Callewaert, together with Strasbourg University's Professor of Law, Florence Benoit-Rohmer, as well as EU Commission's Legal Officer in charge of the still on-going EU-CoE Negotiation for the forthcoming Accession Treaty, Dr. Hannes Kramer, several EuroJudges, Ambassadors/Permanent Representatives to the CoE, (f.ex. of Belgium, etc).
In fact, in good old times, USA's initial History already had produced an unforgettable concrete example, particularly with the Famous Historic Declaration of Rights and Freedoms, which notoriously starts with the symbolic formula : - "We, the People !" A well known Inspiration for many, even Today...
As "EuroFora" previously informed President Spielmann, the main idea that People's genuine interest and support to EU Integration would be Stimulated and developed further, if they felt that at least their Basic Human Rights were effectively protected, (f.ex. on Personal Freedom and Freedom of Expression, Family life, Political or Religious Beliefs, Fair Trial, on participation to really Democratic collective Decision-making, etc), was initially formulated at the Highest level, back on 2008, by Pope emeritus Benedict, (formely Cardinal Ratzinger : a long-time University Professor and Writer), in his official Speech at the Elysée Palace, when he met with former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who was then Chairing the EU (from July up to Decembre 2008). Sarkozy had practically Replied to that point, in substance, by promissing mainly to promote prior Consultations, at least, of all interested Citizens, with well informed and open "Public Debates", (f.ex. accessible also by Internet Fora, etc), before taking any particularly Important Decision which might seriously affect their Lives and/or Society at large, with an important impact for the present and the Future. (Something that his Government tried to do in real practice, f.ex. with a many Months-long Popular Consultation, via many Regional Conferences and a permanently open Internet Website Forum, etc., before the latest Legal Reform on several crucial issues of BioEthics, (etc).
They had exchanged views about that, just a few years rs after the 2005-2007 "No" to EuroReferenda in 3 EU Countries : France, the Netherlands and Ireland, which had revealed the crucial need to take into account, before any Importa,t Decision, and succeed to stimulate EU Citizens' genuine interest, trust and enthousiasm, which is indispensable if European Integration is to advance further in order to become able to really face Today's big Challenges both at Home and in the World. Benedict, as also an experienced former University Professor, who had notoriously published even a landmark Dialogue with famous Philosopher Jurgen Habermas of the nearby Frankfurt School of thought, basicaly around the idea of "Offentlichkeit", i.e. of a Piublic Space for Debates, and who prepared earlier his 2008 official visit to France, then EU Chair, at an Historic Library at Brixen/Bressanone (South Tirol in Northern Italy), where "EuroFora"s co-founder had stayed and met some among his closest collaborators, was certainly aware of the manifold implications and of the potential of previous, well informed and rational Dialogue with all interested People before important Decisions affecting their social and/or political life, and this was obvious in certain Speeches that he made meanwhile also as Pope, (starting by his 1st, private visit to Bavaria, Germany, when he met and spoke with Intellectuals at the University of Regensburg, back on 2005, where he developed the idea of Rational Dialogue as close to the Respect of personal Freedom of choice and Human Dignity).
Such key-ideas, promoted since at least 1997-2007 by "EuroFora"s co-Founder, (which had already an important place at our 1980 Research Work, of more than 1.000 pages, which had been chosen by the Law Faculty of Strasbourg's University for the award of a Prize destinated to Doctoral ¨PhD. Thesis on a proposal by Paris II Professor Paul Amselek, as well as in our interventions at an interesting 2010 Colloquy organized by the European Pole of Public Administration, the ENA and the University of Strasbourg on relevant developments both at National Laws and in EU Law as well as in ECHR's case law, si obviously also a basic element of the current "EuroFora" project, in favor of Public Debates with EU Citizens before European Organizations take important Decisions which affect their lives.
- However, in the specific context of EU's Accession to the ECHR, as foreseen by the current EU Lisbon Treaty, one also has to take into account the reality of the existence of "2 Blocks" among the 47 Member States of the PanEuropean CoE : That of those Countries which are also EU Members, and of all the others, (f.ex. Norway, Swittzerland, Russia, Ukraine, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaidjan and Turkey, etc), other participants in Today's ENA-CoE Debate observed, underlying the fact that this Duality is often met and felt inside alost all CoE's areas of activities, which have thus to manage to build a General PanEuropean Interest outcome each time.
F.ex., the PanEuropean COE wouldn't object at all if the EU might wish to eventually have f.ex. a somewhat Higher Level of Humanb Rights and Democratic Freedoms' Standards, if at least it all respect the basic ECHR prcinciples, some among the participants ensured "EuroFora".
But, concerning in particular EU Judges, an obviously brand new and interesting development in Future, could also be the possibility to refer to the ECHR not only a Direct Application, but also a Prejudicial Question of Wider Interest, f.ex. on the Legality vis a vis Human Rights, of a Draft EU Directive, etc., the participants to the Conference-Debate on EU's Accession to the ECHR highlighted, among also various other interesting, more concrete issues.
(../..)
(NDLR : "EuroFora" intends to return soon back to this issue, with a more thorough presentation of these and probably other similar EU - CoE Debates on that matter, asap).
***
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
- PACE President Cox skips Turkey Worst (Occupation) case compared to Russia (DeMilitarisation) query
Statistics
Visitors: 58929955Archive
Login Form
Other Menu
People in Europe and the World expect from CoE to make a succes of its "Monitoring" for Human Rights and Democracy, despite difficulties, said Finland's President Tarja Halonen to "EuroFora" at a crucial moment for the mecanism built 15 years ago by the paneuropean organization which celebrates its 60th Anniversary in 2009.
Halonen, known as "Mother" of CoE's "Monitoring" mecanism, a long-time MEP and former Foreign Minister before becoming Finland's President, holds a long experience in the mattter, after also serving twice as CoE and EU Chairwoman in the past. That's why she is well placed to judge how CoE's "monitoring" should deal today with some crucial issues of importance both to CoE and to the EU.
The move came just a Month before a crucial, last visit to Turkey, scheduled for June, by the President of CoE''s "Monitoring" Committee, Ukranian MEP Serge Holovaty, to finalize his Report on Ankara, the CoE Member State with the longest Monitoring procedure. From its results depends its overall credibility.
This is a Test-case, because, in fact, it's in order to avoid Sanctions threatened against Turkey by a CoE's Assembly's April 1995 Resolution for grave Human Rights violations, Democracy gaps, the continuing Military Occupation in Cyprus, the unresolved Kurdish problem, Aegean differend with Greece, etc., that MEPs decided to create, for the 1st time on April 1996, a "Monitoring" proces, allegedly destinated to check, without excluding Countries who did not fulfill all CoE's standards.
In the Past, the obliged withdrawal of Greece's Military regime and of its "Civil" cover-up out of the CoE had helped bring back Democracy in 1974. But, on the contrary, since April 1996, the idea was to "monitor" Human Rights' respect while keeping most concerned Countries inside the CoE. After Turkey's oldest example, this was extended also to several former "Eastern" European Countries, even if CoE's Assembly has imposed to some of them (fex. Ukraine, Russia, etc., after Belarus, Serbia, etc) various "Sanctions", that Ankara always avoided. Curiously more succesful even than .. USA itself, (a CoE "Observer" since 1995), which has been at least threatened with sanctions some years ago..
EU-effects of CoE's Monitoring process became obvious between 2001-2008, since the "closure" of this procedure, when CoE felt that a Country had met most of its Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law obligations, (i.e. the "Copenhagen Criteria" for the EU), helped trigger Negotiations with the EU for "Accession" or other closer relations : This occured already before the 2004 and 2007 EU Enlargements to former "Eastern" European Countries, as well as for the commencement of "accession" negotiations with Croatia, and of "open-ended" negotiations with Turkey in 2005.
But a stricking new development are Holovaty's recent findings that on core Human Rights issues as Torture and Freedom of Expression, Turkey, even "5 Years after" CoE closed its "Monitoring", back in 2004, inciting EU to start accession Negotiations in 2005, still presents grave problems.
His findings are of crucial importance after a 2008 CoE Resolution called, "if need be", to "seriously consider the possibility of Re-Opening the Monitoring procedure for Turkey" : A move which might affect Ankara's controversial EU bid, since EU Accession Negotiations are based on the Hypothesis that the Candidate fullfils the "Copenhagen Criteria" (See above)..
-------------------------
Holovaty expressed his will to check "Matters still Outstanding" and those that he "didn't have an opportunity to discuss" at an earlier visit this year, "in order to discuss the more complex issues in greater depth", at his forthcoming New Visit to Ankara, before the December 2009 EU Summit. This is all based on the 2004 CoE Resolution which stresses that, CoE "will continue.. post-monitoring Dialogue with the Turkish authorities,...in addition to a 12-points list,..and on any Other Matter that might arise in connection with Turkey’s Obligations as a CoE member state".
CoE's Resolution also asks from Turkey "to secure the proper Implementation of Judgements, particularly in the Cyprus v. Turkey InterState case", of 2001, which concerns also the plight of many Hundreds of MISSING People. It adds Turkey's obligations to "execute" ECHR's Judgements in the Loizidou case,..and in particular adopt General Measures to avoid repetition or continuation of Violations found by the Court" to the detriment of Refugees.
Nevertheless, Holovaty said to "EuroFora" that "MISSING" persons,"might be included" and cannot be excluded, but he has yet to examine the situation "to find out which issues will be raised" to the Turkish Government.
Therefore, "EuroFora" asked Halonen, as the Historic "Mother" of CoE's Monitoring mecanism, if she thought that, "whenever there are grave Human Rights Violations, as fex. "MISSING" persons, attested even by ECHR's judgements, they should be always checked by a Monitoring process. Or could they be forgotten ?"
- "We (CoE) must be, at the same time, Fair, Realistic, but not in the mind that "now we have Forgotten", etc., replied to "EuroFora"'s question Halonen, speaking as a matter of general principle.
- "When we think of those People that are suffering from the lack of Democracy, of Human Rights, and of the Rule of Law", "we should find a base on how to deal with the (Monitoring) system more rapidly"', she stressed.
- "Sometimes it's very difficult to combine Transparency and Effectivenes together, particularly in this specific case", she went on to say. But, "I have not found a (CoE Member) Country who could be insensitive in this sens", Halonen answered concerning grave Human Rights violations attested by the ECHR.
- "I have no ready-made answer. I have the expectations that you, in the CoE, will, step by step, find the different types of the monitoring systems."
Also "because this is a part of the UN's Post-Conflict system, (fex. when it comes to Cyprus' MISSING persons), and it's a more Global system". So that, "If we make a succes in Europe, the others will follow", throughout the World. "But they expect that we (Europe) are this opportunity, this Opportunity to make a Succes", Halonen concluded.
In addition, she advised to extend CoE's Monitoring to all its 47 Member States, "because, as long as we hear that, all these monitoring systems are "OK for the neighbor, but not for me", "it's very difficult" to understand. Something which could make easier to Compare...
Finnish MEP Jaako Laakso, former CoE Rapporteur on the Occupied Territories of Cyprus and one of the 5 Signatories of the Historic CoE's call to create the "MONITORING" mecanism since 1996, was more specific : - "We (CoE Assembly) have to find a way for the issue of Cyprus' MISSING People to be better followed", he stressed, anouncing his intention to "speak to Mr. Holovaty" about that. "There might be also other ways", added Laakso.
- The 2008 "Year had been a very Bad one for Turkey with regard to Human Rights in general, and Freedom of Expression in particular", denounced, meanwhile, Holovaty's preliminary Post-Monitoringh Draft Report by Holovaty, published by the CoE on April 2009.
"Amnesty International believes that freedom of expression is not guaranteed given the various articles of the Criminal Code that restrict it. .. "For example, 1,300 Websites are said to have been closed down by the (Turkish) authorities in 2008" ! While "the new Turkish Criminal Code was used to bring a total of 1,072 proceedings between June 2005 and April 2008, and led to the conviction of 192 people", for expressing views. "Representatives of the Özgür Gündem newspaper, which specialises in Kurdish affairs, ..complained about Numerous Attacks on their Freedom of Expression ...as was everyone who advocated a settlement to the question by means other than the intervention of the army" "According to their figures, 19 Newspapers had been suspended 43 times between 4 August 2006 and 4 November 2008" !...
Moreover, on 2008, CoE's "Ministers adopted its 4rth Resolution on the execution of the judgments of the ECHR, ...and outstanding issues regarding 175 Judgements and decisions relating to Turkey delivered between 1996 and 2008... concerning Deaths resulting from the excessive use of force by members of the Security forces, the failure to protect the right to life, the DIisappearance and/or death of individuals, Ill-Treatment and the Destruction of property". CoE's " Ministers urged the Turkish authorities ...to ensure that members of Security forces of all ranks can be prosecuted without administrative
authorisation" for "serious crimes". Holovaty reminded.
"Nonetheless", Holovaty heard anew of "Several cases of Violence committed last year (2008) by the (Turkish) security forces". Amnesty International speaks of Many Cases of ill-treatment and Torture in the prisons and by the police". "Including, fex."'the death of Engin Ceber, a young man of 29 who died on October 2008 as a result of the TORTURE allegedly inflicted on him by police officers, prison staff and members of the gendarmerie. He was part of a group of people arrested on September 2008 during a demonstration and Press Conference in Istanbul'. Proceedings against suspects are "on-going" in this case.
- " I therefore noted an Obvious Contradiction between the Government’s stated “zero tolerance” policy.... of Torture and other forms of ill-treatment, and the different testimonies given", denounced CoE's Rapporteur. Turkish "authorities must make considerable efforts to guarantee that proper investigations are carried out into allegations of abuses by members of the security forces and that perpetrators are effectively punished" "In this respect, I have requested detailed Statistics on the number of Investigations, acquittals and convictions in cases involving allegations of abuse in order to show the positive impact of the measures taken to date", Holovaty said, repeating a permanently unsatisfied CoE's demand to Turkey since a Decade...
- "The Political Crisis that shook the country in the spring of 2008 highlighted the Weaknesses of the (Turkish) Constitution", which comes from the Military regime of 1982, "and the Urgent Need of Reforms", stressed from the outset CoE's Rapporteur in 2009. In particular, "the ...Democratic functioning of state institutions, including the independence of the judicial system, are crucial", he observes.
But, "the Electoral system and the ways in which it is circumvented do not appear to give those elected complete Legitimacy, and tend to pervert the course of direct universal suffrage", denounces Holovaty, observing that, even 5 Years later, Turkey did not yet change the 10% nationwide Threshold for a party to take any seat, which is "far higher" than the "3%" maximum in Europe and already condemned as contrary to European Standards by the CoE.
+ Moreover, EU Parliament's 2009 Report on Turkey, drafted by Dutch MEP Ria Oomen-Ruijten and adopted in Strasbourg on March, expresses "Concern over the Failure of the (Turkish) Judiciary to prosecute cases of Torture and Ill-treatment, the Number of which is Growing". EU also "is concerned about continuing Hostility and Violence against Minorities" in Turkey. It also "calls on the Turkish Government to launch, as a matter of Priority, a Political Initiatve favouring a lasting Settlement of the Kurdish issue, (while "condemning violence.. and terrorist groups"). EU "regrets that No progress has been made on establishing full, systematic Civilian suprevisory functions over the (Turkish) Military".
The final results of Holovaty's 2nd and last visit to Turkley will be known later this year, and, at any case, before EU's December 2009 Summit.