english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow EUParliament+CoE support to Snowden: No Role in 2016 US Election? ( CoE Rapporteur Omtzigt to ERFRA)

EUParliament+CoE support to Snowden: No Role in 2016 US Election? ( CoE Rapporteur Omtzigt to ERFRA)

Written by ACM
Thursday, 29 October 2015
pe_vote_on_snowden_29.10.2015_400

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- EU Parliament's unexpected, last minute Majority (286 - 279) Vote supporting Asylum in EU Countries for World Famous Citizens Web Freedoms' Defender, Edward Snowden, to Protect him from Threats of Extradition to the USA, certainly strengthens PanEuropean CoE's already clearly expressed Support, earlier in Strasbourg.


    But the Question whether both these 2 Converging Moves could impact, or not, the recently launched American Public Debates on the forthcoming 2016 US Presidential Election, which can be of Decisive Importance for that Topical General Interest Matter, initially appeared Uncertain, or even Unlikely, as has told "EuroFora" COE's Rapporteur Pieter Omtzigt, a mainstream ChristianDemocrat MEP from the Netherlands.

ksse_peter_omtgist_400


    However, also some Other interesting Converging Developments, both in Europe and in America, might, Add even more Fresh Impetus to this Growing Trend, able to hopefuly facilitate, sooner or later, a Positive Compromise Solution, that some (even among the best) might still think rather "Tabou", until now, (See Infra)...


----------------------------------------------


In particular :


    According to the Full Text of the Amendment adopted Today by EU Parliament's Plenary in Strasbourg, MEPs call "to Drop any Criminal Charges against Edward Snowden, grand him Protection, and ... Prevent Extradition or Rendition by Third Parties (f.ex. the current US Government, of outgoing President Obama).


     This should be done "in Recognition" of Snowden's "Status as WhistleBlower and International Human Rights Defender", MEPs stressed now.


----------------------------------------------------------


    + Today's EU move mutualy Adds Strength vis a vis the PanEuropean Organisation for Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law : CoE's previous Resolution, adopted Earlier this Year in Strasbourg, which also "Calls on CoE (47 : including Russia) Member States", as a matter of Principle, "to "Grant Asylum ... to Whistle-Blowers Threatened by Retaliation in their Home Countries", under certain conditions


    ++ While also "Calling on .... the United States of America to Allow Mr Edward Snowden to Return, withOut Fear of Criminal Prosecution, under Conditions that would not Allow him to Raise the Public Interest Defence". (USA have, indeed, a Special Status at the PanEuropean CoE, with Rights and Duties, since 1995/6).  


    +++ Moreover at another CoE Resolution, adopted Previously in Strasbourg, also on "Mass Surveillance", the PanEuropean Assembly's MEPs Criticized what they had called, then, "the Reluctance of the competent United States authorities and their European counterparts to contribute to the clarification of the Facts, including their Refusal to attend hearings organised by the (CoE's) Assembly and the European Parliament" on that Topical Issue.


    That CoE's Criticism included also "the Harsh Treatment of Whistle-blower Edward Snowden", which "does Not contribute to Restoring mutual Trust and Public Confidence", as MEPs Warned.


--------------------------------------------------------------
Larger Political Support than Initialy Expected
--------------------------------------------------------------------


    Today's EU Parliament's Move kick-started with a Surprise from the outset a Long sesssion of Voting into a quite Comprehensive Resolution on Monitoring overall developments about controversial "Mass Surveillance" practices, particularly when they are exerted ove "EU Citizens".


    The crucial Amendment ("No 10") had been tabled by the vice-President of EU Parliament's Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs' Committee, (aka :  "LIBE"), Jan-Philipp Albrecht from Germany, of the "Green" Group, and was adopted after a Hard Political Fight, with a final Majority of 286 against 279 Votes, (while 73 MEPs abstained).


    Significant of a really Hard Fight on this Vote, which apparently Continued even .. Afterwards, was the Exceptional Fact that the Initialy Anounced Results, (a "Tight" Majority of Only 285 to 281), was, Shortly Afterwards, Rectified, in their Final Version up to that Clear Majority of 286 to 279, and 73 Abstentions, when a Surprizing Number of ...Nine (9) MEPs, from various Political Groups), asked to make several "Corrections" to their Votes, transfering them towards +4 More "Yes", against Only +1 More "No", (and +4 More Abstentions)..


    The Real Supporters of that move obviously represent a much Larger Political Spectrum of EU Parliament than its Initial fans, since, in order to Succeed to attract an Absolute Majority of 285 Votes, it was obviously Necessary to get much More than the "Greens" and the Liberals, as well as the "EuroLeft" Groups Votes only, (which, taken all Together, don't go beyond just 171 votes : So that, Mathematically, even if 14 "Non Aligned", 39 "Europe of Nations and Freedom", and 45 "Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy" MEPs might have Added their Votes, the Total wouldn't have passed a 224 Minority result only, Unless at least 61 More MEPs from the mainstream ChristianDemocrat and/or Socialist Groups didn't Contribute by adding also their own Votes. Without forgeting also 72 MEPs who Abstained, allowing that Amendment to pass :


    => i.e. at least + 133 MEPs more, taken even among the 2 Biggest, mainstream Groups, Christiandemocrats and Socialists, (if not British Conservatives, etc)...


-----------------------------------------
CoE's Rapporteur to "EuroFora" on Impact to US 2016 Presidential Election :
-----------------------------------------------


    Experienced PanEuropean CoE Assambly's Rapporteur both on "Mass Surveillance" and on the Need to Protect "WhistleBlowers" for Human Rights/Democracy, including Snowden, Dutch ChristianDemocrat MEP Pieter Omtzigt, speaking earlier to "EuroFora", expressed, however, his Regrets for the fact that any, even Full and/or PanEuropean Support to the cause of General Interest for all Citizens in Democracy that Edward Snowden serves, in his view, at least as things stood until recently, apparently  - "wouldn't be an Issue for the 2016 US Presidential" Election, as he bitterly but realisticaly Replied to a relevant Question that we had raised..


    - F.ex., "Because, in fact,  both Frontrunner Candidates of main Political Parties don't seem yet ready to accept anything Less than the "Patriot Act"'s Measures, some of which might affext Civil Liberties and Freedoms often on a Controversial manner, the Dutch MEP, (who has recently organized several Hearings with Snowden by Tele-Conference from Moscow to the PanEuropean CoE's Headquarters in Strasbourg), Explained to "EuroFora".

ksse_snowden_in_omtsgist_whistleblowers_freedom_debate_400


    - Omtzigt, invited by "EuroFora" to be more Specific, made it clear that he Meant, by that, Jeff Bush and Hillary Clinton", indeed, then, Top Candidates for  the Conservative and the Democratic Party, respectively.


    But, Recently, things have quite Changed, in this regard : Among the Top Conservative Candidates for the 2016 USPresidential Election, Jeff Bush remains, certainly, always important, but has been notoriously outpassed in Polls by Donald Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, etc., while experienced Huckabee and others follow at close distance. Almost at the Same Time, among Democrat Party's Top Candidates, Hillary, even if she still remains, most of the times, 1st in Polls, nevertheless, Chuck Todd and, particularly, Bernie Sanders, are notoriously Catching Up, More and More Quickly, to the point that several experienced US observers already point at Sanders. So that US Politics, at this moment, have apparently become, at least in at a muh Greater Extend than, initialy speculated, quite Unpredictable..


    >>> Much more Important : BioEthical, Christian, and other "Values" Issues (f.ex. on controbersial "Same Sex Mariage", Sales of Human Parts from Aborted Embryos, Genetic Manipulations on Human Embryos, etc), have Recently become  Crucial in US Politics as Never Before in History, among almost All Top Candidates of the  Conservative Party, which is widely tipped to Win the forthcoming 2016 USPresidential Election,  (at the End of this 2nd Term of Outgoing President Obama, from the Democratic Party),


    almost at the Same Time, that a Series of Christian, Family, Grassroots Citizenship, "Tea Party", and various other "Conservative Values" oriented NGOs, had reportedly been Targetted by the Obama Administration, even for Undue Discrimination in "Surveillance", allowing to Spy and gather many Delicate Personal and/or Collective Data from them, without any clear Legal Basis, adding also another Scandal, inevitably InterRelated to the latter...


    => In Consequence, given also American People's well known Traditional attachment to Individual Liberties, a New US President from the GOP Party starting on 2016, would, probably, be much More enclined than in the Past,  towards being quite Critical against eventual Abuses  of Unjustified and even Politicaly Motivated "Surveillance" of Citizens.


    And, therefore, normaly Closer to American WhistleBlowers who Risked their Career and Personal Freedom in order to Try to Defend Citizens' Rights and Democracy, as  Snowden.


    Something that, already, some among the moost outstdanding American Web Freedom NGOs' Leaders have already asked, earlier at the CoE, particularly speaking with "EuroFora" and other Journalists in Strasbourg, when they observed their Surprise and Sorrow for the fact that EU Countries hadn't yet provided (NDLR : Neither explicitly refused, at least for most of them), any Asylum to a World-Famous and Popular Whistleblower as Edward Snowden, while Russia has done so.
    

(../..)


----------------------------------------------


***

("DraftNews", as already sent to "EuroFora" Subscribers/Donors, earlier. A more accurate, full Final Version, might be published asap).

***

EuroStars-Eureka

Statistics

Visitors: 58970519

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

imag0634_400

People in Europe and the World expect from CoE to make a succes of its "Monitoring" for Human Rights and Democracy, despite difficulties, said Finland's President Tarja Halonen to "EuroFora" at a crucial moment for the mecanism built 15 years ago by the paneuropean organization which celebrates its 60th Anniversary in 2009.

Halonen, known as "Mother" of CoE's "Monitoring" mecanism, a long-time MEP and former Foreign Minister before becoming Finland's President, holds a long experience in the mattter, after also serving twice as CoE and EU Chairwoman in the past. That's why she is well placed to judge how CoE's "monitoring" should deal today with some crucial issues of importance both to CoE and to the EU.

The move came just a Month before a crucial, last visit to Turkey, scheduled for June, by the President of CoE''s "Monitoring" Committee, Ukranian MEP Serge Holovaty, to finalize his Report on Ankara, the CoE Member State with the longest Monitoring procedure. From its results depends its overall credibility.

This is a Test-case, because, in fact, it's in order to avoid Sanctions threatened against Turkey by a CoE's Assembly's April 1995 Resolution for grave Human Rights violations, Democracy gaps, the continuing Military Occupation in Cyprus, the unresolved Kurdish problem, Aegean differend with Greece, etc., that MEPs decided to create, for the 1st time on April 1996, a "Monitoring" proces, allegedly destinated to check, without excluding Countries who did not fulfill all CoE's standards.

In the Past, the obliged withdrawal of Greece's Military regime and of its "Civil" cover-up out of the CoE had helped bring back Democracy in 1974. But, on the contrary, since April 1996, the idea was to "monitor" Human Rights' respect while keeping most concerned Countries inside the CoE. After Turkey's oldest example, this was extended also to several former "Eastern" European Countries, even if CoE's Assembly has imposed to some of them (fex. Ukraine, Russia, etc., after Belarus, Serbia, etc) various "Sanctions", that Ankara always avoided. Curiously more succesful even than .. USA itself, (a CoE "Observer" since 1995), which has been at least threatened with sanctions some years ago..

EU-effects of CoE's Monitoring process became obvious between 2001-2008, since the "closure" of this procedure, when CoE felt that a Country had met most of its Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law obligations, (i.e. the "Copenhagen Criteria" for the EU), helped trigger Negotiations with the EU for "Accession" or other closer relations : This occured already before the 2004 and 2007 EU Enlargements to former "Eastern" European Countries, as well as for the commencement of "accession" negotiations with Croatia, and of "open-ended" negotiations with Turkey in 2005.

    But a stricking new development are Holovaty's recent findings that on core Human Rights issues as Torture and Freedom of Expression, Turkey, even "5 Years after" CoE closed its "Monitoring", back in 2004, inciting EU to start accession Negotiations in 2005, still presents grave problems.

    His findings are of crucial importance after a 2008 CoE Resolution called, "if need be", to "seriously consider the possibility of Re-Opening the Monitoring procedure for Turkey" : A move which might affect Ankara's controversial EU bid, since EU Accession Negotiations are based on the Hypothesis that the Candidate fullfils the "Copenhagen Criteria" (See above)..
-------------------------
    Holovaty expressed his will to check  "Matters still Outstanding" and  those that he "didn't have an opportunity to discuss" at an earlier visit this year, "in order to discuss the more complex issues in greater depth", at his forthcoming New Visit to Ankara, before the December 2009 EU Summit.  This is all based on the 2004 CoE Resolution which stresses that, CoE "will continue.. post-monitoring Dialogue with the Turkish authorities,...in addition to a 12-points list,..and on any Other Matter that might arise in connection with Turkey’s Obligations as a CoE member state".

    CoE's Resolution also asks  from Turkey "to secure the proper Implementation of Judgements, particularly in the Cyprus v. Turkey InterState case", of 2001, which concerns also the plight of many Hundreds of MISSING People. It adds Turkey's obligations to "execute" ECHR's Judgements in the Loizidou case,..and in particular adopt General Measures to avoid repetition or continuation of Violations found by the Court" to the detriment of Refugees.

    Nevertheless, Holovaty said to "EuroFora" that "MISSING" persons,"might be included" and cannot be excluded, but he has yet to examine the situation "to find out  which issues will be raised" to the Turkish Government.

    Therefore, "EuroFora" asked Halonen, as the Historic "Mother" of CoE's Monitoring mecanism, if she thought that, "whenever there are grave Human Rights Violations, as fex. "MISSING" persons, attested even by ECHR's judgements, they should be always checked by a Monitoring process. Or could they be forgotten ?"
    
     - "We (CoE) must be, at the same time, Fair, Realistic, but not in the mind that "now we have Forgotten", etc., replied to "EuroFora"'s question Halonen, speaking as a matter of general principle.

    - "When we think of those People that are suffering from the lack of Democracy, of Human Rights, and of the Rule of Law", "we should find a base on how to deal with the (Monitoring) system more rapidly"', she stressed.

    - "Sometimes it's very difficult to combine Transparency and Effectivenes together, particularly in this specific case", she went on to say. But, "I have not found a (CoE Member) Country who could be insensitive in this sens", Halonen answered concerning grave Human Rights violations attested by the ECHR.

    - "I have no ready-made answer. I have the expectations that you, in the CoE, will, step by step, find the different types of the monitoring systems."

    Also "because this is a part of the UN's Post-Conflict system, (fex. when it comes to Cyprus' MISSING persons), and it's a more Global system". So that, "If we make a succes in Europe, the others will follow", throughout the World.  "But they expect that we (Europe) are this opportunity, this Opportunity to make a Succes", Halonen concluded.

    In addition, she advised to extend CoE's Monitoring to all its 47 Member States, "because, as long as we hear that, all these monitoring systems are "OK for the neighbor, but not for me", "it's very difficult" to understand. Something which could make easier to Compare...

    Finnish MEP Jaako Laakso, former CoE Rapporteur on the Occupied Territories of Cyprus and one of the 5 Signatories of the Historic CoE's call to create the "MONITORING" mecanism since 1996, was more specific :  - "We (CoE Assembly) have to find a way for the issue of Cyprus' MISSING People to be better followed", he stressed, anouncing his intention to "speak to Mr. Holovaty" about that. "There might be also other ways", added Laakso.

    - The 2008 "Year had been a very Bad one for Turkey with regard to Human Rights in general, and Freedom of Expression in particular", denounced, meanwhile, Holovaty's preliminary Post-Monitoringh Draft Report by Holovaty, published by the CoE on April 2009.

    "Amnesty International believes that freedom of expression is not guaranteed given the various articles of the Criminal Code that restrict it. .. "For example, 1,300 Websites are said to have been closed down by the (Turkish) authorities in 2008" ! While "the new Turkish Criminal Code was used to bring a total of 1,072 proceedings between June 2005 and April 2008, and led to the conviction of 192 people", for expressing views. "Representatives of the Özgür Gündem newspaper, which specialises in Kurdish affairs, ..complained about Numerous Attacks on their Freedom of Expression ...as was everyone who advocated a settlement to the question by means other than the intervention of the army" "According to their figures, 19 Newspapers had been suspended 43 times between 4 August 2006 and 4 November 2008" !...

    Moreover, on 2008,  CoE's "Ministers adopted its 4rth Resolution on the execution of the judgments of the ECHR, ...and outstanding issues regarding 175 Judgements and decisions relating to Turkey delivered between 1996 and 2008...  concerning Deaths resulting from the excessive use of force by members of the Security forces, the failure to protect the right to life, the DIisappearance and/or death of individuals, Ill-Treatment and the Destruction of property". CoE's " Ministers urged the Turkish authorities ...to ensure that members of Security forces of all ranks can be prosecuted without administrative
authorisation" for "serious crimes". Holovaty reminded.

"Nonetheless", Holovaty heard anew of "Several cases of Violence committed last year (2008) by the (Turkish) security forces". Amnesty International speaks of Many Cases of ill-treatment and Torture in the prisons and by the police". "Including, fex."'the death of Engin Ceber, a young man of 29 who died on October 2008 as a result of the TORTURE allegedly inflicted on him by police officers, prison staff and members of the gendarmerie. He was part of a group of people arrested on September 2008 during a demonstration and Press Conference in Istanbul'. Proceedings against suspects are "on-going" in this case.

- " I therefore noted an Obvious Contradiction between the Government’s stated “zero tolerance” policy.... of Torture and other forms of ill-treatment, and the different testimonies given", denounced CoE's Rapporteur.  Turkish "authorities must make considerable efforts to guarantee that proper investigations are carried out into allegations of abuses by members of the security forces and that perpetrators are effectively punished" "In this respect, I have requested detailed Statistics on the number of Investigations, acquittals and convictions in cases involving allegations of abuse in order to show the positive impact of the measures taken to date", Holovaty said, repeating a permanently unsatisfied CoE's demand to Turkey since a Decade...

    - "The Political Crisis that shook the country in the spring of 2008 highlighted the Weaknesses of the (Turkish) Constitution", which comes from the Military regime of 1982, "and the Urgent Need of Reforms", stressed from the outset CoE's Rapporteur in 2009. In particular, "the ...Democratic functioning of state institutions, including the independence of the judicial system, are crucial", he observes.

    But, "the Electoral  system and the ways in which it is circumvented do not appear to give those elected complete Legitimacy, and tend to pervert the course of direct universal suffrage", denounces Holovaty, observing that, even 5 Years later, Turkey did not yet change the 10% nationwide Threshold for a party to take any seat, which is "far higher" than the "3%" maximum in Europe and already condemned as contrary to European Standards by the CoE.

    + Moreover, EU Parliament's 2009 Report on Turkey, drafted by Dutch MEP Ria Oomen-Ruijten and adopted in Strasbourg on March, expresses "Concern over the Failure of the (Turkish) Judiciary to prosecute cases of Torture and Ill-treatment, the Number of which is Growing". EU also "is concerned about continuing Hostility and Violence against Minorities" in Turkey. It also "calls on the Turkish Government to launch, as a matter of Priority, a Political Initiatve favouring a lasting Settlement of the Kurdish issue, (while "condemning violence.. and terrorist groups"). EU "regrets that No progress has been made on establishing full, systematic Civilian suprevisory functions over the (Turkish) Military".

    The final results of Holovaty's 2nd and last visit to Turkley will be known later this year, and, at any case, before EU's December 2009 Summit.

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING