EU Crisis Response Commissioner Georgieva to EuroFora: Science+Research to predict/prevent Disasters
Efficient Response to curiously growing recently Natural Disasters, such as Extreme Weather Events, (f.ex. Heatwaves, Floods, etc), as well as Earthquakes, etc., needs to boost breakthrough Scientific Research and Technological Innovation, agreed with "EuroFora" EU Commissioner on Crisis Response, Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid, Kristalina Georgieva, in a joint Press Conference with EU Parliament's Rapporteur on Civil Protection Force and Disaster Response, Elisabetta Gardini, and the Head of the Italian Delegation Mario Mauro.
On this point, European and International Cooperation is crucial in practice, she added, including as example even USA's FEMA... (See infra).
----------------------------------------
- "Concerning the Definition of "Response" : Could and should it also include Preparation, and, in particular, Scientific and Technological Research ?", asked "EuroFora" asked the competent EU Commissioner.
- "Because there are still many aspects f.ex. of Extreme Weather Events, such as exceptional Heatwaves, Floods, Storms, Earthquakes, etc., which are not yet scientifically well known, their real causes are not yet completely known", observed "EuroFora" from the outset.
- Indeed, "There are, at least, some parts wich are stilll unknown". Therefore, "may be, breakthrough Scientific Research and Innovative Technologic Solutions, could be particularly useful" there, we pointed out. In consequence, "do you think that something should and could be done also in this direction ?", we asked.
----------------------
- "In the forthcoming (EU Commission) Legislative proposal, we focus also on Preparation, in terms of <<Risk Analysis>> and deployment to respond to Disasters. And, in this sens, Yes, we (EU) do need to better Understand the Threats to our (EU) Citizens, and what we have in our Capacity to respond to these threats, as well as, what it is that we need to Understand Better", the competent EU Commmissioner Kristalina Georgieva replied positively to "EuroFora"s question.
- "To give you ("EuroFora") one example : I met with the Administrator of FEMA, the Federal Administation for the United States' Emergency Management Agency. And in that discussion, he identified as a very important area for Cooperation between the USA and Europe, exactly in lifting the bar as we look at Risks", (i.e. something which obviously needs a quite good Scientific Knowledge and Technologic development to eventually face them).
+ Moreover, this includes even "preparing what he called <<the Unthinkable>>, i.e., "expanding our capacity to anticipate even Low Probability Risks, that may have very Huge Consequences".
- F.ex., "one example of such Risks, f.ex. in Italy, could be a Tsunami caused by an Earthquake under the Mediterranean Sea. The probability of such an event is very low. But the Destruction it could provoke is enormous !", Georgieva warned.
=> "Therefore we need to expand our Understanding and our Scientific Knowledge on Predicting these Risks, and also in Monitoring the EcoSystems, the Changes that are happening, that could give us a Better Indication for when it might be a Moment to Act". (...)
- "And I just want to repeat what I've said : We think "Response" in this Continuum : Prepareness, Prevention, Response, Rehabilitation, Learning Lessons, and Integrating them into how we prepare for Disasters", she concluded.
---------------
+ "Another thing FEMA's head told me is that a Priority was to adapt USA's system so that it can receive International Assistance, because, as he said, "even us, the USA, we cannot assume that we are well prepared for any Disaster. And he gave an example : If p.ex. a whole City in the US is affected by Terrorist Attacks, then, the Rescue Teams they have in the U.S. may not be Sufficient", EU Commissioner added later to "EuroFora"
=> "So, what we are doing in Europe, is that we are trying to make it clear that Cooperation is the only way we can struggle in the face Increased Intensity and Frequency Disasters"
+ Also because "Europe is so Compact and so Densely Populated, that when a Disaster hits, the impact is quite Significant", she warned.
So, "while we (EU) don't have the Dramatic cycles of Myanmar, Bangladesh, or India, etc.", nevertheless, "when we (EU) have Floods, the impact can be quite Serious. When we have Summer-Heatwaves, it kills over 60.000 People", she denounced.
=> Therefore, "obviously we (EU) need to be better Prepared, in order to be able to respond, whenever we have trends of this nature. And that is why Cooperation is so important, especially during Austerity, when Money is short, the only way we can act is to Pool Resources", she concluded.
----------------
- "It is less well known that Europe today is an area where, per unit of Territory, and per Population, we have one of the Highest Intensities of Disasters", the competent EU Commissioner warned.
=> Thus, only "in the last 10 Years (2001-2011), a Hundred Thousand of Europeans died by (so-called) "Natural Disasters", the largest number of people died during the 2003 Heatwave that affected Europe, (and particularly France), which costed us 150 Billions €", she denounced.
This apparently doesn't take into account also the 2010 Giant Heatwave which hit Russia's Capital Moscow and its most developed areas, killing Tens of Thousands of People, burning Forests and Fields, threatening High Tech Industries, Defense, etc.
- "So, Disasters are not just a problem for Pakistan, and Bangladesh, Haiti, etc. They are a problem for Europe, and, therefore, we (EU) need a Strong Capacity to Respond", which "directly benefits our Citizens"; Kristalina Georgieva stressed.
- Indeed, "Disasters don't discriminate between Rich and Poor. Even the best prepared pupils in the class, and, f.ex. Japan was the best prepared, may be in need of International Assistance", she observed.
Therefore; "We are going to present a Legislation focused on "Response", but in the framework also of "Prevention", etc.
=> "We want top have Pre-arranged, Pre-planned, Predictable Responses to Disasters, based into Integrating the Civil Protection systems of our Member States bottom-up".
------------------------
Georgieva spoke to "EuroFora" during and after a Press Conference together with EU Parliament's Rapporteur on "Civil Protection and Humanitarian assistance" a "stronger European disaster response"; Italian ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Elisabetta Gardini, as well as mainstream MEP Mario Mauro, Head of the Italian Delegation.
Gardini's Report calls for an efficient, and "not bureaucratic", "EU Civil Protection Force", with Solidarity and Cooperation between EU Member States, based on EU's Emergency Response Centre, with real time "Monitoring, including through use of Satellite data", "mapping", etc.
The adopted Resolution stresses, in particular, that "relevant Scientific Research needs to be further Developed, with a view to improving Risk assessment mechanisms, systems of Prevention and means of Combating ... phenomena" such as, f.ex. "extreme Drought and forest Fires, (which) have increased in frequency and scale in Europe".
It's also in order "to combat Bio-Terrorism", that EU Parliament "calls.. on the (EU) Commission to launch a feasibility study on the merits of setting up, allocating European Research budget funding to, and naming European reference Laboratories".
Indeed, "Preventing disasters is often more Cost-effective than combating them; therefore, (MEPs) stress... the vital need to ....step.. up the EU’s and Member States’ Risk Prediction and prevention policies and encourages the Commission to prepare a(n)... Innovative EU strategy on disaster risk reduction; calls for sufficient resources to be dedicated to Early identification of Possible Disasters, and asks the Commission to ensure that the revision of the Structural Funds and the Solidarity Fund are used to encourage the development of ... Investments in these areas; furthermore, calls for improved Education on disaster prevention, investment in the prevention of disasters and climate change".
(NDLR : "DraftNews", as already sent to "EuroFora"s Subscribers/Donors. A complete, more accurate Final Version may be published asap).
***
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
- PACE President Cox skips Turkey Worst (Occupation) case compared to Russia (DeMilitarisation) query
Statistics
Visitors: 58898222Archive
Login Form
Other Menu
Former "Green-Red" German government's Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's job at the controversial Turkish pipeline "Nabucco" was denounced as "not proper", "very bad", and "incompatible with Democracy", by the new President of EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group, German Lothar Bisky, replying to an "EuroFora" question.
For once, criticism of Joschka Fischer's doings with Turkey affecting Europe, didn't come only from the Center-Right of the political spectrum, but even from his Left side : The experienced Bisky, who has been chairing all over 1993-2009 the PDS - Die Linke party :
- "Former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer got involved in dealings with oil-gaz business in a foreign country, Turkey, and its controversial Nabucco pipeline. This raises questions about Democracy, also because of the well known problems of Human Rights violations in that country. Do you thing that this might be abused in order to cover up and close EU's eyes on Human Rights violations ?", "EuroFora" asked Bisky.
- "Nabucco pipeline is (only) at the planning stage". And "there are some difficulties", he observed from the start. But "'I don't want to get into the details of Nabucco pipeline, because I don't think that there is any point for it at the moment".
At any case, "we (EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group) strongly believe that Politicians should not get involved in the Energy Business, and all these commercial transactions", President Bisky declared on the Joschka Fiischer's affair.
- "We feel that it's something that shouldn't be done. It's not proper !"
- "We don't think that it's compatible with Democracy either, and it gets politics into a very Bad track", Bisky went on to denounce.
- "EuroLeft and "Die Linke" always spoke against that, saying that politicians should not get directly into the arms of private enterprises"
- "It is pretty bad if a former Minister takes a job f.ex. in a major Energy producer. So, it's an issue if a Minister who may have seen excellent opportunities, subsequently gets personally grasp of them, in very serious parts of the economy, once he has given up his (Government) job."
- "It doesn't really make politics in general look any better'", Bisky concluded.
Earlier, this week in Strasbourg, other Journalists had also raised critical questions on former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's involvement in the conroversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline to the President of his own EuroParty : Kohn-Bendit of the "Greens", who, contrary to Bisky, tried to find excuses for Fischer, while criticizing his long-time partner, Schroeder for having done a similar move :
- "Shroeder was chancellor", and he "negociated" with "Russians", who gave him a job only "3 Months" after he resigned from the Government. While "Joschka Fischer", on the contrary, got a job with the controversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline only "4 Years after" he left the Government. "He didn't negociate Nabucco", so I have "no objection", Kohn Bendit claimed.
But, many Facts indicate the contrary :
Joschka Fischer was Foreign Minister in Germany from 1999 up to 2005 : I.e. from the year that EU took the controversial decision to give Turkey a "Candidate" status, until he year it started controversial "accession negotiations, (later declared "open-ended" after Sarkozy-Merkel's arrival from 2005-2007).
During that period was prepared the controversial so-called "Annan" Plan (in fact, drafted by others and attributed afterwards to the former UN SG) on Cyprus, which failed after a Popular Referendum said "No" on 2004 with a large Majoriy of 3/4 : 75%. Mainly because it was criticized for making too much concessions to the Turkish side : Particularly by restricting Greek Cypriot Refugees' Human Right to return to their ancestral Land and/or get restitution of their Familiy Homes and private properties, usurpated by Ankara's Army since the 1974 militay invasion and continuing occupation of the northern part of Cyprus. And by weakening the Central Government, leaving to 2 "constituent States" so much powers and separate interests that more conflicts appeared inevitable, provoking the danger of a break-down in the foreseable future, with more crisis, troubles, perhaps bloodshed, etc., instead of creating an harmoniously integrated, really one federal State.
The controversial Plan was finalized on March-April 2004 at Burgenstock (Switzerland), curiously in the presence of an Envoy by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Germany, then governed by Joschka Fischer, but in the absence of a French and not even an European Union's Envoy, contrary to what was usually practiced on similar occasions in Switzerland (fex. in 1997 at Montreux, in 2000 at Geneva, etc).
Turkey notoriously exploited the failure of the "Annan" Plan in order to convince the EU to decide to start accession Negotiations on December 2004. This provoked an unprecedented series of Institutional Crisis inside the EU, shortly afterwards, when French and Dutch People rejected, 2 popular EuroReferenda by a majority "'No" vote to the EU Constitutional Treaty on 2005, aggraveted in 2004 a Majority Abstention to EU Elections, etc., followed by the recent Irish "No", etc.
"Nabucco" Gas pipeline was notoriously planned since ..2002. It follows an even earlier idea, for an Oil pipeline Baku-Ceyhun, which started to be prepared on 1999-2001 and was meanwhile recently completed.
So, facts indicate that what is now at stake is based on decisions made during Joschka Fischer's term as former Foreign Minister, closely interested in Turkey's controversial EU-bid.
To the point that he now practically ...switched jobs with a poliician from Turkey, (the State which pays today openly Joschka Fischer), Mr. Ozdemir, who came earlier in Germany, got fast the nationality, and became EiuroMP in a few years, continuing now as head of the "Greens" in Germany, i.e. in Joschka's former job !...
Such astonishing facts risk, unfotunately, to give to German politician Lothar Bisky's criticism of representative Democracy a topical meaning :
- "We (EuroLeft Group) think that what is really at stake is Democracy. It's not only about Gas Pipelines or Energy sources", President Lothar Bisky went on to add in his reply to "EuroFora"'s question on Joscka Fischer's personal interests in the controversial Turkish "Nabuco" pipeline.
Such facts, "make People get more distance from Politics. ...People had had enough, and they are fed up !".
- "That's why we (EuroParliament's "EuroLeft" Group) want to strengthen Direct Democracy in Europe. Citizens should be involved in the (EU) Decision-making. In the end of the day, it's not going to help anyone if Politicians are always taking decisions, without involving Citizens. We want to give a voice to the People of Europe. They've got to have their say in the decisions that are taken. That's one of our absolutely fixed and steadfast views. We want more Direct Democracy in Europe. That's how it can become more effective and stronger", he concluded.
-