english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow EU Parliament Rapporteur Costello to EuroFora on EU and USA Food+rehabilitation Aid for Poor People

EU Parliament Rapporteur Costello to EuroFora on EU and USA Food+rehabilitation Aid for Poor People

Written by ACM
Tuesday, 21 May 2013
eu_rapporteur_to_agg_400

*EU Parliament/Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- EU Parliament's Rapporteur on the European Aid to the most Deprived People, Irish MEP Emer Costello (ESD), from the Governing coalition currently chairing EU Council, replying to "EuroFora"s Questions, pointed at the fact that the American Federal Government continues to spend some 100 Billions € for Food stamps to the Poor, i.e. apparently much more than the EU, but welcomed also EU's intention to reportedly add Social Re-Integration measures, due to help People get out of Poverty traps, while admitting, however, the fact that several other MEPs and NGOs warn to find adequate ways to prevent any risk of "substitution" of urgently needed, elementary Food Aid, by Employment-related matters, whch are difficult to apply f.ex. to Children, very Old People, irregulatrs, etc, so that a balanced Compromise is yet to be soon decided between MEPs, Commission and Governments (See Infra).

20130521_150350_400

The move came at a Press Conference just after EU Parliament's Employmenyt and Social affairs Committee adopted with a Majority her Report on the creation of an EU "Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived" People, yesterday (Monday) Evening.


pe_evening_monday_20_may_2013_400



- "EuroFora" had asked Costello, (who is also President of the EU - Palestinian Legislative Council delegation), what was the relevant situation in other developed Western Countries, as, f.ex. in the USA, compared to Europe.

pe_rapporteur_looking_top_agg_400 

+ As well as for some "more concrete" information on EU's reported intention "not only to help in situations of Extreme Poverty, but also into contributing to get Out of Poverty", as she had highlighted earlier.

agg_quest_pe_b_also_remedy_400 

----------------------------

- "You made a reference to the U.S., and, indeed, the U.S. Department of Agriculture spends approximatively a 100 Billions € to help eligible Households in terms of Food Aid" :


- "That's 100 Billions € that they (USA) would spend, and that Funding Stream (still) comes from the Agrcultural Department", (i.e. at a Federal level), EU Parliament's Rapporteur stressed in reply  to "EuroFora"s 1st question.

pe_rap_repoly_sml_to_agg_400

Naturally, to be fair and accurate, EU Countries'  Help to extremely deprived People at a National level  should also be taken into account in any estimations which would compare the overall Help to extremely Poor People in Europe with that which exists in the U.S., (where, sometimes, also Federated States add to the U.S. Federal Aid, too).
-----------------


+ "On your 2nd Question : One of the main Differencies between this particular proposal, (for the period of 2014-2020) and the previous one (which existed between 2007-2013), is that the previous one came from the (EU) Agricultural Budget line, while, this particular Fund will come now from the Cohesion funds, i.e. it will come from the Social Budget", Costello went on in her replies to "EuroFora".


 - "That's something very Important, because one of the issues around the New (EU) Fund is that it has Requirements from the Organizations which are working with the Administraton to find the beneficiaries of this Fund, to actually Engage in what's called "Accompagnying Measures" : That's essentially to contribute into finding ways to Help re-Integrate these People into Society". F.ex., "If they are Homeless, that the(se) Organizations should help them find a Home ; if they are Unemployed, that they help to bring them into a stage where they might participate in a Training course, that is actually funded by the ESF" (EU's Social Fund),etc., she indicated.

=> - "This (New) particular (EU) Program, because it has a Social Inclusion emphasis, differs from the previous program, and we believe that it's something which is actually very important. That's an area where the NGOs,the Charities are actually Welcomed", as it was stressed "when we (EU Parliament) went at Consultation with them", she concluded on this point.

pe_reply_tpo_agg__400
 

+ At any case, "it's important to know that this is the ONLY (EU) instrument that deals with People suffering from an Extreme level of Poverty, because the ESF funding is normaly for Labor Market interventions", i.e. "it's adressing issues of may be Disadvantaged or Unemployment, rather than Extreme material Deprivaton", EU Parliament's Rapporteur clearly Distinguished.  
------------


Meanwhile, it seems true, (as a collegue Journalist evoked immediately afterwards), that some mainstream NGOs warned against what they called "a Substitution effect", particularly "if the programme allows the financing of Social services", because they are afraid that at least some "EU member States will be tempted to finance their own Structural costs, instead of Food hungry people". In this regard, they reportedly "stressed that the program is about the fundamental Right to Food", while, Today, "some 18 Million EU citizens desperately need this", "many of whom are Not even Employable (f.ex. Children, Elderly, Irregular migrants, etc.)". But, "Food Aid is a Bridge to Social and Employment services", which should, normally, keep their own resources.


That's one of the reasons for which the proposal, in its current shape, even if it got a clear Majority in the competent EU Parliament's Employment and Social affairs Committee, nevertheless, it lacked 2 more votes in order to become able to start immediately final Negotiations with EU Commission and EU Member  States' Governments at EU Council, so that it will need to be better hammered out inside EU Parliament (probably in concertation with the competent EU Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, László Andor), before final decisions in the forthcoming Months, (and while the wider framework of EU's Multi-Annual Financial Perspectives 2014-2020 is still negotiated between MEPs, Commission and Governments, hopefully arriving at conclusions during or after the Summer, as some unverified yet but generally well informed sources indicated later to "EuroFora").

(../..)

***

(NDLR : "DraftNews", as already sent, earlier, to "EuroFora"s Subsribers/Donors. A more accurate, full Final Version might be published asap).

***

 

StartUpEU

Statistics

Visitors: 58926069

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

dsc00365_400

3 EU Parliament votes to boost EuroGroup !

---------------------------------

After EuroZone Paris Summit's succes, Sarkozy calls to "think anew how to re-construct Europe !

"EuroZone and EU Institutional debates pave the way to 2009 discussions on EU Future, including Enlargment, Turkey etc. ?


23 October 2008

After EU Parliament strongly suppported in 3 successive Votes this week in Strasbourg French EU Chairmanship's move to boost Euro-Group at EU's core, while ideas on EU Institutional problems are awaited on December, "it's an open Question now" if this may lead to a debate on EU's Future, or not, told us French President, Nicolas Sarkozy''s Spokesman, Pierre-Jerome Henin.

MEPs voted on Thursday fresh Funds to support EuroGroup, after adopting on Wednesday a Resolution asking a "further Evolution" to "the 1st ever meeting of Heads of State and of Government of the Euro-Zone, taking decisions in that capacity", while earlier this week a Report asked "a stronger Institutional setting" for "EuroGroup", extended from "competitiveness/industry" to "environment, employment and education", with "increased powers for Political decision-making", according to a text drafted by French MEP Francoise Beres and German MEP Werner Langen, "10 Years after the creation of Euro" (1999 - 2009).

- Brussels' subsequent "EU Council ..(simply)..ratified the measures decided by EuroGroup on October 12" in Paris, which "were necessary to contain the current Financial Crisis", Resolution observes, expressing also support to the new process succesfully initiated by Sarkozy and due to be completed by agreements with USA and other countries at a Global level.

From now on, it's between two differend but parallel moves : EU's delay, and EuroZone's acceleration, that Enlargement and particularly Turkey's controversial EU bid, will have to search its way :

Indeed, EU's 27 expect a "Roadmap on how to deal with the Irish problem" on Lisbon Treaty ratification after December, risking to pass even 2009 Elections and next Commission with the old Nice Treaty of 2000, out-dated and unfit even for 2004's Enlargement...

On the contrary, EU's core launches a real "Economic Governance for EuroZone at the highest level of Heads of State/Government" of the 15, which started in Paris on October 12 and was strongly supported this week in Strasbourg by Sarkozy and EU Parliament.
----------
- "It's a good idea, to launch such a debate ("on EU's Future") in EU Parliament in view of 2009 Euro-Election : Perhaps some MEPs will seize an opportunity", told us mainstream French MEP Alain Lamassoure, former EU Minister and EU Spokesman for France's governing party UMP.

- "All MEPs' debates on such EU Councils are also part of the larger debate on Europe's future : Now with EuroZone, and even more when, on December, Irish Prime Minister is due to table proposals in Strasbourg on how to deal with EU Treaty's ratification", replied earlier to our question EU Parliament's Press Director and Spokesman, Jaume Duch.
--------------------------------------
Sarkozy has formally anounced his intention to open EU Debates on Economy, Identity/Enlargement (i.e. mainly Turkey), etc. both linked to a popular Political view of Europe, since his Historic speeches on EU in Strasbourg, on February and July 2007, when he stressed that "Europe needs a New Renaissance". At the beginning of the French EU Presidency, on July 2008, replying to a MEP, he suggested that EU Parliament takes an active part in Debates on EU's Future.

- Now, in 2008, "Crisis are an opportunity to re-think how to re-construct Europe", Sarkozy stressed. At any case, the Historic 1st EuroZone Summit of Heads of State/Government, which started replying to the Financial crisis,"is a Turning Point : After that, Europe cannot be governed as before, but differently" : People "like a Europe with Strong Will".

- "We must make the System move !", "Europe needs Innovation" and free political debates. EU "Elections are in a few Months", Sarkozy warned.

He invited EU Parliament to fully play its role as "the Democratic Heart of the Europe we want : United, Independent and Voluntarist, because the World needs Europe's voice".

- "It's no more possible for Euro-Zone to continue without an Economic Government" at the Highest Level of Heads of State/Government, who provide "Democratic Legitimity" and can take important decisions, he announced, strongly supported by EU Parliament's Economic Committee which just voted to boost the "Institutional" aspects of "EuroGroup".

Plasticity offered by the current absence of a special Treaty on EuroZone's Institutions "made it easy to adapt the organization of the 1st Summit with imagination, to efficiently meet urgent needs", he observed, on the occasion of Brittish Prime Minister's exceptionnal presence at the greatest part of EuroGroup's Paris Summit.

- "In EuroZone we have the same Bank, the same Money, and, thus, a same duty for Unity" : "By bringing together EuroGroup's 15 members States we suceeded to find a solution and prepare a Giant Plan of 1.800 Billion euros", Sarkozy reminded of Paris' 1st Historic EuroZone's Summit.

Afterwards, Brussels' EU Council followed the move, and USA's Paulson II Plan was inspired from that. "Europe must promote the idea of Global Economy's Refoundation", he stressed.

dsc00390_400


- "I was frankly astonished when I found, at the EU, a rigid system, where any New Idea was seen from the outset as a sacrilege, while, on the contrary, Europe needs Innovation !", he described.

F.ex. ,"'When we first spoke about the "Union for the Mediterranean", it was misunderstood as something extraordinary.. When later we had the Russia -Georgia crisis, it seemed against EU's custom to act "in the middle of August", instead of staying a passive spectator ! And when, in front of the Financial ciris, we gathered the 1st EuroZone Summit of the "15", some thought of it as a lese-majesté", he denounced.
----------------------
On Geo-Political Principles :
----------------------
- But, by moving resolutely, "EU obtained the ...withdrawal of Occupation Troops in 2 Months !", reminded Sarkozy, observing that Russia "fulfilled its commitments", in the Georgian crisis, where a "disroportionate reaction" from Moscow followed a "totally inappropriate action" from Tbilisi's troops. "It would be crazy to reply by military means : EU should not become accomplice of another Cold War, imposed by lack of cool heads".. as he said.

In future, "the creation of a common European Economic Area with EU and Russia, would also obtain a raprochment on our Human Rights and Democratic Values", added Sarkozy, in a statement which should logically be applied, a fortiori, to controversial EU "candidate" Turkey..

Particularly when, the same week that EU Parliament voted 2009 EU Funds for Turkey's controversial EU bid, ECHR took a series of judgements condemning Turkey for grave Violations of Human Rights, such as : Torture, death of a political prisoner in unclear circumstances followed by failure to conduct a proper Investigation, "enforced Disappearance" of a youngster aged 17, Killing of a sepherd with Tank Shells, persecuting Journalists for articles on "Missing" People, even a former President of Human Rights' Association, (etc)

- "We (EU) can defend our ideas on respect of Sovereignity and territorial Integrity, on Human Rights and other differences ... without confrontation", Sarkozy stressed, on the occasion of Russian/Georgian conflict, reminding that : "we were only 2 steps from catastroph", when a Peace agreement brokered in Moscow prevented, at the last minute, Russian troops' advance towards Tbilisi.

An EU Parliament Resolution adopted Wednesday in Strasbourg on the occasion of Russia - Georgia conflict, outlines a set of Principle which apply elsewhere too, (particularly when EU Rapporteur for Russia and Turkey is one and same person ; Dutch MEP Ria Oomen-Ruijtanen !)

Clearly rejecting any "military solution to the conflicts", MEPs "condemn ..all those who resorted to force and violence". They denounce a "disproportionate military action", "as well as (an) unilateral decision to recognise the independence" of brekaway regions, "calling.. to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity" of the concerned country, "and the inviolability of its borders recognised by all EU Member States". They warn that "EU must review its policy towards" a 3rd Country, "should .(it)...not comply with its commitments", and "stress that the withdrawal of.... troops from the areas ....is an essential additional step".

EU Parliament "calls for the safe and quick return of refugees, (accepted by Russian President Medvedev) accompanied by the deployment of EU observers on the ground", and "regrets ...that ..EU Monitoring Mission (EUMM) is not allowed to enter the ...breakaway regions". Moreover, "It's important to ensure that persons and NGOs ..engaged in defending human and civil rights can operate". "Until ...all remaining issues (are) resolved..., and notably the continuing ...Military presence", "relations with the EU ..cannot be fully normalised", MEPS warned.

As nobody likes to be accused to practice "Double Standards", this should be regarded as "Principles" applicable to any Third Country at EU's Neighborhood.. No ?

-------------------

On Economy :

-----------------------
- "When Financial crisis shook US and EU's Banks, without result from the 1st (American) Paulsen plan, it was the common reply of the 1st EuroZone's Summit, involving some 1800 Billion euros, which started a positive move in the markets, soon strengthened by the follow-up of the US Paulson 2 Plan, noted Sarkozy.

- "Europe should not be only on the defensive, but, if necessary, know also how to take an offensive", he said, brushing away hesitationsto act on Economy: - "I'm for a refondation of Capitaliism, but against Speculators, who betray its values" : "Lack of Rules was profitable to speculators, Not to businessmen !" We must make sure to prevent any such crisis in future". "We, the rest of the World, cannot continue to bear the deficits of the 1st World power without saying anything !", the French President said, applauded by EU Parliament. All this needs "a New Global Governance", on which EU Parliament must debate. That's why "we proposed together with USA, several Summits from mid-November", to which G-8, enlarged to China, India a.o. countries, should participate. UNO's SG; Ban Ki Moon, the IMF, etc.

Financial crisis lowered shares' prices even for healthy companies, sometimes to 1/3 of their initial price, so that strangers might buy EU industries for only a portion of their real value, and Europeans may wake up one day with their main industries sold out to foreigners !

That's one of the reasons for which EU should debate about creating "Golden Shares" for States to jointly take Strategic participations to help European Industries until the end of the Crisis, particularly against distording competition, he suggested, pointing at USA's 35 billion $ plan for American Car Industry."We shall struggle for Europe to be able to build Airplanes, Ships, Trains, Cars, because we need a strong Industry", he concluded.

"F.ex. as we did back in 2004, when as Finance Minister, we bought Alsthom's shares for 800.000 euros, and, after restructuring, we sold them for 2 Millions : Help a company and make money is not so bad"...

As for the UK, "when Ireland announced that it would guarantee only Irish Banks, London City emptied from liquidities in 24 hours : It's the EU which helped to restore the situation, Not the UK alone !", reminded Sarkozy to nationalist British MEP Nigel Farage.

dsc00381_400


On the contrary, in a last-minute attempt for the EU to catch-up with its Institutional delay "before the European Elections" of June 2009, MEPs simply voted a call for a "set of proposals" to be made for the "Irish public opinion" at the end of the year...

- "As long as Lisbon Treaty is not ratified by all 27 EU Member States, there is an unanimous decision to stop Enlargement, reminded Wednesday in Strasbourg the French Minister for EU affairs, Jean-Pierre Jouyet..

Added to an indirect but clear warning that, without Lisbon Treaty, all 27 EU Member Countries may not have a Commissioner in the 2009 resuffle, MEPS in the Constitutional/Foreign affairs Committees applauded hoping that this might motivate their Irish friends..

dsc00360_400

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING