english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Trade Minister Lefebvre: Socialist candidate Hollande to break EU Growth Motor:Innovative Investment

Trade Minister Lefebvre: Socialist candidate Hollande to break EU Growth Motor:Innovative Investment

Written by ACM
Montag, 05 März 2012
20120305_16.39.01_400


*Strasbourg/- The "motor" of sustainable Growth : Businesses' innovative Investment, according to France's and EU's Strategic Priorities, must be safeguarded against various Threats by controversial "Socialist" cadidate to the forthcoming Presidential Elections of April/May 2012, Hollande, to "break" it by disrupting the "balance"' between Business Initiative and the State, strongly warned Trade, Services and SME's Minister, Frederic Lefebvre, speaking at a meeting of the Union of Craftsmen of Alsace region, in the presence of Strasbourg's Journalists including "EuroFora".


He made that point while Businesses' Innovative Investments' policy, spearheaded in Europe mainly by France, Germany and other EU Countries in order to boost Competitiveness, limit State's Debts, develop Higher Technology Exports in a recently Globalized World Economy with heavy competition has recently started to give Positive Factual Indicatios that it might be starting to win the race, with a careful but steadily growing and new, sustainable Growth emerging at the end of 2011 and expected to rise mainly at the second half of 2012 as well all through 2013, as recentl frequent augmentations in Stock Markets, the success of ECB's massive, low-cost Loans to EU Banks, the Signature of €uroArea Governance's Treaty, €urozone's Sovereign Debt's Stabilisation and agreements to settle the Debt on Greece and Ireland's progress for recovery, France's and other EU Countries' higher than expected 2011's End's Growth, €uroarea's better results on Foreign Trade, etc, while, on the contrary, at the same time, on the contrary, USA's Economy (whose Strategy is notoriously driven also by classic Consumption's support) started to have growing Problems in Debts and recently even in Foreign Trade Deficit, particularly with €uroarea, (See various relevant "EuroFora"s NewsReports).

20120305_12.46.28_400

- Lefebvre reminded that French "President Sarkozy gave the Priority to Innovative Investment", and pointed to the "wonderful example" of Franco-German SME "Novalix", based in Strasbourg, which had been already visited by Sarkozy on December 2009, when he anounced here the overall policy of a more than     35 Billions "Great Loan" for pioneer Investments in Universities, Scientific Research and Technologic Development projects, Digital Economy, etc, (See "EuroFora"s NewsReports from that event) : He observed that, in this case, that SME, working on new pharmaceutical and other products with avant-guarde Research in Chemistry, Medicine and Bio-Physics, by "using all Tools that we set up during the last 4 years in order to support innovative Investment", Fiscal facilities to Research, Funds for "Initiatives of Excellence", in cooperation with Universities, etc., succeeded to "grow its Turnover from  3,5 Millions € up to 8 Millions € just between 2009 and 2011 !".

20120305_12.38.48_400

+ Moreover, "while initial Forecats predicted a slight recession of - 0,1% during the "Hard" period of the last trimester of 2011, on the contrary, France succeeded to obtain at least a + 0,2% Growth, mainly thanks to an augmentation of Businesses' Investment for + 1,4%", Minister Lefebvre added, as another, Nationwide, concrete example in the same direction.     


- It's almost since the period of De Gaulle (back in the 1960ies+) that France hadn't yet seen other so really Big Inverstments, particularly on Infrastructures, as it has a chance to built now, since, after notoriously stoping for many years, on the contrary, recently, Innovative Investments have become the No 1 Priority of all Economic policies at EU's core, including in Germany and, in France alone, including with the more than 35 Billions' strong "Great Loan" set up from 2010 for "Initiatives of Excellence" and many other such projects, which are still being selected in order to be funded now,  he observed.


- But, instead of safeguarding the existing "delicate Balance between Businesses and the State", which is now "a Partner of Enterprises", particularly when they invest on innovation (See supra), on the contrary, several recent positions taken by controversial "Socialist" candidate Hollande, in fact, threaten to seriously disrupt that delicate Balance, and "break" EU's new "Motor for Growth", (i.e. Businessses'  investments on Innovation), denounced Lefebvre, pointing at Measures brandissed by the French "Socialist" Party's representative to "Impose" certain "Obligations" to Businesses and/or other entities, Private or Public, which have adopted the model of an Enterprise,  (as, f.ex. a  Public Electricity or Telephone Company,  a University with "Autonomy" status, etc),


Indeed, one of Hollande's recent  such projects concerned Universities, including those who have already opted for an "Autonomy" regime, and anounced his intention to impose the obligation to Hire all Students admitted in order to prepare a PhD Thesis, transforming them into a sepcial category of full-time Workers with a professional status, Salary, etc.


 - "But, this would completely destroy the currently existing Equilibrium between the "Autonomy" of Universities and their Cooperation with the Government", between Freedom of Academic  Research and Enterprises, etc., particularly thanks to a series of instruments recently created, as such of Fiscal facilities for Research, Funding of "Initiatives of Excellence", "Poles of Competitivity", etc. On the contrary, such Measures, by imposing f.ex. massive obligations to hire professional workers, etc. will eliminate the Economic Logic which currently incites  Investment to Innovation, and seriously undermine the Future" of France and the EU "by  breaking down this Motor of Growth", (Comp. Supra),  Lefebvre warned.

20120305_16.26.09_400


This would be particularly scandalous if it occured now, when EU's specific Stratregy for the road leading out of the Global Crisis, seems to have just started to yield, still insufficient but steadily  growing Positive Results, clearly indicating that EU may have really found a successful, Winning formula..


+  [He could obviously add, in this particular case, that, if such Obligations to "transform all Students-Researchers preparing a PhD Doctoral thesis into full-time Professional Workers, earning a Salary, etc", as Mr. Hollande's team apparently wants, then, this would, in real practice, also Threaten Citizens' Freedom and Right to have Access to University Studies and Research according to Academic Criteria f.ex. of Knowledge, Capacity, Success to Examinations, Good Notes obtained during previous University studies, etc., since, in that case, even the most Brillant among University Students might find unacceptable Obstacles to even start and/or continue a Doctoral Thesis opposed to them under various Hypocritical pretexts, simply because one or another Irresponsible  Official or University Department might not wish, and/or even not have enough Funds in order to "Hire" more Students preparing a PhD, and/or prefer, for various, sometimes scandalously Arbitrary motivations, to give a "Professional Pay" to other Students, even of lesser Academic level, even with Lower Notes, etc... An obvious Risk which would seriously undermine Unversity Students' Right  to prepare a Doctoral Thesis in this or another domain of their Free Choice, if they have the relevant Academic and intellectual Capacities and level  : An obviously Fundamental issue which risks to affect even the Structure of any Society ].
----------------------------------------------------
Meanwhile, given also the fact that the controversial "Socialist" candidate recently complained that nobody among the biggest EU Countries' Leaders has ever accepted to meet him, (neither German Chancellor Angie Merkel, nor the Prime Ministers of the UK, Italy, Poland or Spain,  Cameron, Monti, Tusk or Rajoy, etc., after similar refusals even in the US or China, etc), after he threatened to Block the Ratification and ask a Revision of the New Treaty on €uroArea's Governance decided Last Year (see "EuroFora"s NewsReports from August 16th Franco-German Summit at Elysée Palace in Paris, and from December's EU Summit in Brussels), and already signed last week by 25 EU Heads of State/Government, (See "EuroFora"s NewsReport from Berlin's Franco-German Summit of January 10 and from Brussel's EU Summit of Jan. 29, as well as our specific  publication on EAG Treaty), while he has also criticized the current Strategy which gives Priority to Innovative Investment and Competitiveness in order to create sustainable Growth able to boost a strong Foreign Trade balance in front of the Globalization, (instead of artificially pushing the Consumption, as usually in the Past),  Lefebvre had just denounced that yesterday :


- "It's strange that Mr. Hollande is surprised by the attitude of big European leaders in his regard", when "he starts by telling them" : -  " I won't respect the (€uroArea Governance) Treaty that you have negociated all together, even if France has signed it with you". "And, afterwards, he treats them, with intolerance and a lot of dedain, as Conservatives who impoverish the People, precisely at the moment that Europe is united and active in order to react to the Global Crisis, as it has rarely been done (in the Past)".


 - Indeed, "it's rare to collect smiles by slaping someone in the face", and "it's even more surprising to make a complaint" afterwards, Lefebvre (who, in addition to his current Ministerial Job on Trade, SME's, etc., holds also a deep Experience as former Press Spokesman of the Governing Party UMP), had reportedly concluded on this point.
----------------------------------------------

20120305_18.05.36_400


On the contrary, returning towards his main purpose to speak about concrete measures in favour of "a Partnership between the State and Businesses", particularly on Investment-related matters, (Comp. supra), the French Minister briefly highlighted also other, supplementary Measures recently taken in order to facilitate f.ex. the Creation of New Enterprises, (including with the particular, simplified status of "Individual Business of Limited Responsibility (Liability)" (EIRL),  protection of Craftsmen's know-how, Training, facilitation of Access to Banks' Loans, etc.

organ_mulheisen_400


After visiting earlier also a performant, Organ-maker and/or repair Business at Strasbourg's outskirts, "Mulheisen", whose staff has alteady received many individual awards of the "Best Worker of France" for the Quality of its work, while serving both the German and the French side of Rhine river, Lefebvre developed the idea that, "in nowadays' Globalization,  Standardisation makes the World feel stronger the need for Authentic Quality, and this is a great opportunity for the Intelligence and Know-How that we have in Europe", which "must be protected" and developed further, as he said on the occasion of Craftsmen's obvious, well deserved Pride, which was honoured by the award of Prizes to "Businesses of Living Heritage" to various Crafts, from Organ-makers ("exporting up to Russia and even Japan"), up to Shoe-makers, special Whisky producers, Flower-shops, Sculptors, etc., who provided several concrete examples of the fact that "Tradition and Innovation" can co-exist also in Historic Craft-work, able even to Export abroad", as he pointed out, after  a debate on modern "Digital Innovation" measures to boost Modern Craftsmanship's capacity to create also more Qualified Jobs in performant Enterprises, in the wider framework of EU's current focus on facilitating SME's Employment potential, (Comp. "EuroFora"'s NewsReport from January 2012 Brussels' EU Summit).                             
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

***

(NDLR : "DraftNews", as already sent earlier to "EuroFora"s Subscribers/Donors. A more accurate, full, Final Version might be published asap).


***
European Entrepreneurial Region

Statistics

Visitors: 58687277

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu


  imag0573_400

    An "Eugenic" loophole Amendment, which might expose to Dangers reminiscent of "3rd Reich's" notorious Genetic Abuses, hidden at the last minute inside an otherwise Good, larger Health policy Package scheduled to be voted on Thursday, was strongly denounced by a coalition of MEPs from various Political Groups and Countries, in a Press Conference held this afternoon at EU Parliament in Strasbourg.

    Mainly calling to "Select Human Embryos", via "Genetic Counselling" and "pre-implantation" Techniques including "Genetic Tests", in order to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", it might open ways to Dangerous Practices in Future, they denounced in substance.

    But they also made it clear that a much larger Report inside which this Controversial Amendment "No 15" was added in dubious circumstances, officialy destinated to struggle against "Rare Diseases", and drafted by Professor Antonios Trakatellis, was otherwise "an Excellent Report", aiming at a "completely Uncontroversial target" of Health policy on which "all MEPs and Experts are united, believing that Europe should act" to protect People's Health (See "EuroFora"'s earlier News).

    The controversy came at a particularly delicate moment for the EU in relation to Citizens, at the eve of June 2009 EU Elections, and shortly before Ireland re-votes for "Lisbon Treaty"..    

- Denouncing risks of "an Eugenic demand, very similar to what we had during the 3rd Reich in Germany, but now coming from some Scientisists themselves", German ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Dr. Peter Liese stressed that critical MEPs were against "Eugenic" engineering with "Selection of Human Embryos", and anything which might ultimately lead up to to a "Selection of Human Race". It doesn't help to "eradicate" Human Lives, he added.


    Several Experts and NGOs expressed "Deep Concern", as f;ex. DR M.C. Cornel of the "European Society of Human Genetics", which stressed, on this occasion, that "the importance of Non-Directiveness in Reproductive issues is a Central characteristic of Human Genetics, after the Atrocities committed in the name of Genetics in the first half or the 20th Century".

     - "This is completely Unacceptable", stressed Italian Liberal MEP Vittorio Prodi, on the Controversial Amendment, also because pushes to "eliminate early Human Life", as he noted.

     - "This opens a Dangerous Road, rather a Motorway", denounced Danish MEP Mrs Margrette Auken, from the "Greens", observing that various similar attempts were made in the Past "not only in Germany, but also in several other Countries, "even at the 1970ies", "f.ex. on forced Sterilisation of Roma" People, and other criticisable situations f.ex. in the UK, in Sweden, etc. as she said.

    + Other NGOs, as f.ex. "LebenHilfe" from Berlin, added that, among various other Risks, could also be that, by exploiting the pre-implantation Genetic Diagnostics and the Selection of "healthy" Embryos, some may "propagate" several "Eugenic" aims, starting f.ex. by pushing to eradicate Human Livies which might "Cost too much" to preserve, ultimately exposing to dangers reminiscent of the "3rd Reich"'s atrocious abuses.

    In consequence, ChristianDemocrats/EPP and "Green" MEPs "decided by Majority to vote against" this Controversial Amendment, anounced to Journalists the 5 MEPs who participated in the Press Conference, representing a wide spectrum, from Liberals to "Greens" and ChristianDemocrats, and from Hungary, Italy, Germany and Danemark up to Ireland (Gay Mitchell), etc.
----------------------------------
    Hungarian ChristianDemocrat MEP Laszlo Surjan said "that it was "Suddenly, at the End of the Procedure" in Committee, that "appeared this (Controversial) Amendment, which has nothing to do" with the main purpose of the Report, on which all agreed.

    He denounced an "Unhonest" move, and called to "avoid this kind of unacceptable situations". Nobody should "Select People", Surjan stressed.

    - "We (MEPs) had No Chance to Discuss" this last-minute Amendment earlier added at a Committee's level, said German MEP Peter Liese

    Speaking to "EuroFora", Dr. Liese, the Spokesman of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group in EU Parliament, said that MEPs didn't oppose other references of the Report f.ex. on "Genetic Tests", because they were "no proposals" to impose them, while, on the contrary, there was "a Problem" if anyone attempted to "impose" f.ex. this or that Genetic Technique and "Genetic Counselling", etc. to the People on human reproduction.
-------------
The precise Text :
-----------------
    Controversial parts of Amendment No 15 ask mainly "to lead finally to the Eradication" of "Hereditary" "rare diseases", "through Genetic Counselling .., and ..pre-Implantation Selection of healthy Embryos".

    But  EU Rapporteur Professor Trakatellis, said to "EuroFora" that fears should be alleviated by Guarantees that all this should be done only "where appropriate", when it's "not contrary to existing National Law", and "always on a Voluntary basis", according to other Parts of the Amendment.

    He stressed that the main aim was to allow "a free and informed choice of persons involved", without imposing them anything :  - "It's not an obligatory, but advisary" text, he said.

    To make that point clear, he was ready, in agreement with many MEPs, to eventually drop at least that part of the controversial Amendment which initially called for "efforts to ..lead finally to the Eradication of those rare diseases" "which are Hereditary".

    But, until late Wednesday evening, reportedly together with many other MEPs, he stood by all the rest of the controversial Amendment, (fex. on the "Genetic Counselling" and the "pre-implantation Selection of healthy Embryos"), so that critical MEPs, going from ChristianDemocrats as Dr. Liese, to "Greens" or "Ind/Dem", observed to "EuroFora" that "this was not enough" to close the dangerous loophole.

    Particularly since, as Professor Trakatellis noted himself, "this is already allowed to the U.K.", and "other National Legislations would probably follow, sooner or later" in a similar direction. As for a general call to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", this "should happen, at any case, in practice, de facto", to protect public Health.

    On the contrary, "our goal should be to help patients suffering from rare diseases, not to eradicate the patients. In case of genetic disease risk, the decision should not be guided by scenarios" made by politicians. "Perents who may decide to accept a child, even if handicapped or with genetic disease, must be respected and supported with solidarity", critical MEPs stated.

    - "Any Pressure" to "a patient or couple (who "should be able to make an informed choice consistent with their own values"),"from health Professionals, Public Health Policies or Governemental Institutions, or Society at large, should be avoided", stresses the "European Society for Human Genetics".

----------------------------------

Each MEP's vote will be registered !

-----------------------------------   

The Socialist Group requested a "Split vote" on the Amendment 15, first without, and afterwards with the words "lead finally to the Eradication" etc.


    But the first "split vote" leaves intact all the other parts of the Controversial Amendment, (i.e. "Genetic Counselling", "Selection of healthy Embryos", etc).

    That's why, 3 Groups of MEPs : ChristianDemocrats/EPP, "Greens/EFA", and "Ind/Dem", have asked for "Roll Call Votes", on everything regarding the Controversial Amendment No 15, and on the final outcome of the resulting Report as amended, which will register all the individual positions to be taken by each MEP.   

Something which will obviously make each MEP think twice before voting for one or another choice, to be sure that he/she will make the right choice in front of EU Citizens, particularly at these pre-Election times...


    Crucial Votes were scheduled between 12 Noon and 1 p.m. local Strasbourg time, in the middle of a long series of various other Reports, and after a long Public Debate on the larger Health policy package, from 9 to 11.50 am.

    The specific Report inside which was hidden the controversial Amendment is due to be debated between 11 and 12 am.

    So that more last-minute Surprises may not be excluded a priori...

    Particularly at the present Historic moment, when even the Institutional Future of the EU depends on the result of a second Referendum on "Lisbon Treaty", later this year, in ...Ireland, a mainly Catholic country, where People are particularly sensitive in such kind of socio-cultural and values issues...
 

      ***     
 
     (Draft due to be updated).
 
***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING