english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Macron's Top MEPs to EF: Need for New Drugs+Vaccines against Virus Not Denied (as EU seeks to Move)

Macron's Top MEPs to EF: Need for New Drugs+Vaccines against Virus Not Denied (as EU seeks to Move)

Written by ACM
Monday, 11 October 2021
macron_key_meps_to_agg_eurofora_400


*Strasbourg/Press Club/Eurofora/- As Europe is the Only Continent in the World where Virus' Infections Grow and even Head towards Record-High levels, (UPDATED), while the Few Controversial Fake "Vaccines" Authorized in the EU (Excluding Various Others, particularly "Classic" type vaccines faithful to Pasteur's basic principles), are Obviously Failing, (See, inter alia, also : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfizerfakevaccineboomsvirusinaustralia.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fewfakevaccinesfascismcrashes.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fewfakevaccinesfascismcrashes.html, etc), embattled French President Emmanuel Macron's Top MEPs on Health and WhistleBlowers, Replying to a "Eurofora"s Questions in Strasbourg's Press Club Today, did Not Deny a current Need for New Medical Therapies and Vaccines the soonest.

This Results from a Press Conference where Participated 5 Strasbourg's MEPs of the Presidential Majority, including, mainly, a vice-President of the French National Parliament, former Key Rapporteur of CoE's Assembly on "Whistle-Blowers" : Sylvain Waserman, who has extensively Dealt with Edouard Snowden (See Infra) and Assange's "Wikileaks" (Inter alia, See also: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/coerapporteurforassangeprotection.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/coerapporteurforassange.html, etc.)related also to various Critical Issues raised by "Eurofora" in the Recent Past about the Virus' Pandemic, as well as another Key French MEP : Thierry Michels, full Member of the relevant Committees on European and Health affairs at the French National Assembly, and Expert at US-Headquartered MultiNational Medical Research Company "Lilly"'s EU outlet here.

----------------------------

eucom_vp_kyriakides_at_pace_coe__eurofora_400 

+Topically, this comes Shortly After EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides, (Cf. various Kyriakides' Replies to "Eurofora"'s Questions, in her former role as CoE Assembly's President, f.ex. at : ..., etc), had just announced EU's Intention to Try to Boost, in Addition, some Drugs against the Virus, at least as long as, Despite the existence of some controversial vaccines, nevertheless, People are Still Infected and/or Dying from COVIT-19. Meanwhile, Kyriakides spoke also at CoE Parliamentary Assemly's Plenary, Recently in Strasbourg, where she pointed at the Paradox of the Achievement of a 70% Vaccination Target in the EU (i.e. in 27 out of PanEuropean CoE's 47 Member States) on Summer 2021, (Limited to Only the 4 which were Authorized), Despite the current Fact that Infections and Deaths still Persist, and sometimes are even Growing in Europe...

The competent EU Commissioner, Replying to various MEPs' Questions, Acknowledged that there is "a Gap" vis a vis Many Citizens that "we Need to Address" on the Issue of those Few and Controversial "Vaccines", But said that the Main Role belongs to the Member States. And, Even if a Question on some WHO-Recognized Vaccines Not Yet Authorized by the EU, was, Unfortunately, "Forgotten" during the PACE's Debate, nevertheless, Kyriakides, Interestingly, Admitted that, normaly, Member States Could Authorize, in principle, Any Vaccine that they Wish, Independently and in Addition to those already Accepted by EU Organisations, (Nonobstant the Fact that, in Real Practice, such a Possibility seems, at least until now, to be Largely Excluded by a Majority of EU Governments, as, f.ex., was seen at the Pressure exerted on some Slovakia or Greece cases, Contrary to that of Hungary, etc).

-------------------------------

+ So, in Our Question, Today, "Eurofora" Observed mainly that those Few so-called "Vaccines" Authorized by EU Bureaucrats currently look to be rather Failing, given, inter alia, also the Fact that Europe has become,; Nowadays, the Only Continent in the World where particularly Infections, but also Deaths are currently Growing, while Even Pseudo-"Vaccinated" Individuals can Infect Other People, in Addition to themselves Becoming Infected, (Contrary to what happens for All "Classic"-style, Real Vaccines, during 2 Centuries since Pasteur's Invention), at least 4 European Countries have Just "Suspended", these days, one of the Controversial "m-RNA" Novel Tools, Affecting the Human Genome, (Denmark, Sweden, Iceland, Finland, etc), after UnExplained Deaths Soon after those Jams' Shots, in several Countries accross the World, including France, USA, New Zeland, etc., Following "Astrozeneca"'s Notorious earlier Discredit, to the point that even poor Serbia did Not Find Volunteers to get it, (as Also Australia, and Many Others), being Obliged to "Donate" the Unused stocks to More Poor Countries..., Added to "BioNTech/Pfizer"'s 1st Fall in Stock Markets this August 2021, Following, inter alia, also the revelation that it was Fading Out, Losing efficacy Only in 4 Months Time, and needing a "Boost" (or may be, soon a 4rth Intervention, etc), as well as quite Inefficient vis a vis the New Variant "D", responsible of a massive "Flop" on Infections and Deaths in Australia nowadays, (etc).

=> In Consequence, we Asked a Group of 5 Macron's MEPs, including Top Personalities on Health and Whistleblowers in Europe, (See Infra), whether the French President, who had shown, Initialy, a landmark Ambition for Europe's Role in Succesfully Fighting, throughout the World, that Health-devastating or even Deadly Virus' Pandemic, (including by Breakthrough Scientific Research), wouldn't feel now at least Misleaded by some Controversial, Unscrupulous and/or InCompetent Technocrats or Counsellors, Provoking obviously negative Popular Reactions, (particularly at the Eve of Crucial 2022 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections), so that, inter alia, he Might Agree to Find a practical and realistic Way to frankly convince People to get Sufficient Medication, particularly by Adding some New, No Controversial and more Efficient Medical Therapies and Real, Classic Vaccines, to be Authorized the Soonest possible.

Indeed, Macron had shared his Dream for the possible Invention of "a European Antidote" to that Deadly Vaccine, at a landmark Speech, right from the Start of this Pandemic (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/macronandeuagainstvirus.html, etc), But, on the Contrary, Later-on, Europe appeared Divided, leaving the World's Medical Leadership Only to ...Turko-Americans or Otherwise purely USA, added to Post-BREXIT UK, as far as it concerns a Few Controversial Fake-"Vaccines" related to COVID-19 and Affecting the Human Genome, which proved to be quite InEfficient, sometimes Dangerous, and even UnPopular...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

macron_keymep_michels_to_agg_eurofora_400 

 - What you ("Eurofora") evoked, reminds the fact that, when I worked on the Coordination of European Countries vis a vis that Sanitary Crisis, one of the Ideas that we had Supported was the Creation of an EU Agency able to Face such Public Health Crisis, equiped with some 7 Billions €, for Drugs or Vaccines, including, mainly, by Stimulating Breakthrough Medical Research, observed Top French MEP Thierry Michels in Reply. This may become quite Topical, Nowdays, in the framework of the 2021-2022 Conference on Europe's Future, while, in the Past, almost Nobody spoke about such a development, he pointed out...

 + Meanwhile, indeed, EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides has Just proposed something apparently Similar, as she described in her above-mentioned intervention, Recently, at CoE's Assembly (Comp. Supra), All EU Member States have just Benefited from EU's Joint Purchace Strategy on aquiring Vaccines against the Virus, and the EU has notoriously emerged at the 1st Place in the World for the percentage of Vaccinations among its Population, as Michels reminded, (citting also, f.ex., about 80% for France, i.e. much More than Switzerland, etc).

=> Now, concerning your ("Eurofora"'s) Question on the eventual Authorisation of New Vaccines, we (EU) are Waiting, f.ex., that Producer Countries, as also Russia, China, and/ors, Present their Files to the competent European Authorities,  as EMA, etc. But it's true that, f.ex. Russia is Not precisely an Example in Vaccinations' percentage, while, at any case, the EU brought us a way to collectively Manage that Health Crisis, Michels concluded, (apparently Skipping, however, the Fact that the WHO has Already Recognized 2 Chinese Vaccines near Pasteur's "Classic" principles, which have Not Yet been Authorized by the EMA, as "Eurofora" reminded)...

''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

french_assembly_vp_waserman_to_agg_eurofora_400 

++ Vice-President of French Parliament, and Rapporteur on "WhistleBlowers", initialy of the CoE, and Now of the National Assembly of France too, MEP Sylvain Waserman, Replying also to "Eurofora"'s Question, prefered to Focus  mainly on the point concerning Macron's Decision-Making on Key Issues about the Deadly Virus' Pandemic Crisis, in order to Challenge the view that the French President might, eventualy, be, sometimes Influenced by some Bureaucrats :

- Indeed, he referred, inter alia, Also to certain Crucial and Difficult Choices, Already made in some Strategic Importance Dillemas, including, f.ex., the DeConfinement of Summer 2020, etc., Stressing that President Macron had always carefully "Heard", before deciding, what several Scientific Experts and other stakeholders had to advise, But, Finaly, had Chosen Independently of that, according to what he sincerely Believed to be better for the People, the Country, and all Europe. And he observed, in this regard, Also the Fact that, Despite some undue Warnings about Alleged "Catastrophes" branded by certain sides, Nevertheless, such Risks have Not materialized at all. On  the Contrary, Waserman pointed, on this occasion, at Macron and Merkel's notorious Success to broker a landmark Franco-German and afterwards EU Agreement, on July 2020 in a Brussels' exceptionaly Long Summit, for a New kind of Strong joint Financial Support to a European Recovery Plan, (currently Starting to be Implemented from 2021), etc.

=> Therefore, he Obviously implied that, Also on "Eurofora"s above-mentioned Question about Eventual New Therapies and/or Vaccines, an Adequate Decision Could be made asap, withOut any Undue Influence by anyone else.

+ Interestingly, as far as it concerns, in Addition, Public OvberSight, Transparency and Democratic Accountability of various such Hard Choices, after the Adoption of his 1st Report on "Whistle-Blowers" by CoE's PanEuropean Assembly, (Following a long Investigation, which included even a landmark Video-Press Conference with World-Famous dissident Edouard Snowden at the CoE, where "Eurofora" participated actively : See http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/whistleblowersineuandcoe.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/snowdenfriendshelpwhistleblowers.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/snowdenlaughonlongmuellerspyingtrump.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/muellerand911.html, etc), Waserman Examined this same Key Issue also in relation with EU's similar, but not identical, latest Regulation, in order to Conclude in a New Report for a Draft Legislation in France for the 1st Time, which would be Officially Presented, for Final Adoption by the National Assembly, in Paris Soon. (That may cover, also, at least some among "Eurofora"'s relevant Press Investigatory and Critical Publications on Crucial Issues about the Virus' Pandemic : Comp. Supra +).

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

-----------------------------------------------

 

EUDigitalForum

Statistics

Visitors: 59139657

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 

pace_freeze_meps_400_01

They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------

CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment

Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :

A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.

"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...

Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.

Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..

Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...

tomllinson

Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.

But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..

Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..

woldsteth

"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.

- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.

- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock

hancock

"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"

curtis

PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.

vries

Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING