english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Slovakia: New Government Coalition ciment = criticism of Bureaucracy + controversial Turkey EU bid ?

Slovakia: New Government Coalition ciment = criticism of Bureaucracy + controversial Turkey EU bid ?

Written by ACM
Sunday, 13 June 2010
slovak_binding_force_needed__03

Interesting EU-wide effects may come from Political Changes made possible after June 2010 Slovak Election, judging from recent statements to "EuroFora" a.o. by Leaders of Christian-Democrats and Liberals, where Criticism of Bureucracy and of Turkey's controversial EU bid can be solid parts of a New Coalition Government, able to attract also other minor parties totalling 79 MPs, compared to only 71 (i.e. - 8 MPs less), from which only 62 MPs are sure, for the former Socialist-led Government Coalition, which shrinked.

However, Socialists (who will try first to form again a Government) claimed that any Adverse Coalition "wouldn't last even one (1) Year", pointing to the fact that the Center-Right needs to unite together at least 4 different Parties in order to form a New Government, which will obviously need a strong "ciment" in oder to bind them together for a full new term.


But it would naturally be hard for the Oppositions' Front Runner, Iveta Radicova of the SDKU, (particularly after losing almost -33.000 Voters and - 3 MPs in the 2010 Elections compared to 2006), to keep 4 Parties together by merely repeating that "if Turkey fullfils the (EU) Conditions, then EU will have to negociate Accession", as she had done back in 2008, i.e. by ignoring the New big Political Developments of May 2007 French Presidential Election, June 2009 EU Parliament Election, and September 2009 German Election, (etc), which were all won by Political Leaders clearly opposed to Turkey's controversial EU bid, precisely as all her main Winnnig Partners (who, on the contrary, succeeded to augment more Votes and MPs in 2010) also do, as well..

---------------------
Christian Democratic Movement KDH, led by former EU Culture and Education Commissioner Jan Figel, augments its Votes from 191.443 up to 215.755 (nearly 9%) and wins +1 MP more, growing at 15 MPs, while the Democratic and Christian Union SDKU of Iveta Radicova, partly keeps most of its previous results with some 390.000 Votes (15,4%) and 28 MPs. When they are United together, these 2 Christian Parties can total  43 MPs.

Figel, speaking earlier to "EuroFora", observed that, in the Past, "Enlargement was one of EU's great success, although now, Enlargement - Fatigue is visible. So, we have to continue Enlargement on the basis of Strict Conditionality", "As far as Turkey is concerned, in particular, EU Negotiations are an "Open-ended process. There ara No automatic answers or solutions", (as EU Council and Parliament have decided in recent years).  But, "when we look into all current Issues which are Criticized, or evidently Problematic, in this (EU - Turkey) process, I think that Comitments from the side of Turkish Authorities are needed.  That's why, "the idea of Privileged Partnership between EU and Turkey, may clearly and realistically reflect one of the potential answers, (specially) if it's not able to complete (EU) Conditions in full", he concluded.

- Thus, "given the Long-lived Problems" on Ankara's controversial EU-bid, today, the Christian Democratic Movement (KDH) "considers appropriate that Turkey is offered a Special Relation in the form of a Privileged Partnership", instead of a Full EU Membership, Figel's Party Program for the 2010 Election explicitly stresses.

Figel's stance can be a strong, concrete Link to the new Liberal ("Freedom and Solidarity") SaS Party's emergence, which wins +22 MPs in 2010, which, (after having supported unsuccesful candidate Radicova in the 2009 Presidential election), stresses now that it wants to free EU from Bureaucratic deviations and from Turkey's controversial EU bid :

 - Indeed, Liberal SaS's 2010 Official Program explicitly excludes any Full EU Membership for Turkey, prefering, on the contrary, "only" a "Special, Associate" status, "in the model of the European Economic Area".  I.e. apparently near to what French President Sarkozy, in agreement with German Chancellor Merkel, has already advocated ! (See relevant"EuroFora"'s earlier NewsReports)


Anti-Bureaucratic criticism stands also high (No 1 !) in new Party "Most-Hid" which aims to merge inside Slovakian politics the interests of Minority Speakers of Hungarian, from a neighbouring country where criticism of Turkey's ambitions vis a vis Europe seems deeply enracinated in History since the struggles for the Liberation of all Hungary from the Military Occupation of the former Ottoman-Turc Empire, at the beginning of Europe's "Enlightenement" century :  Adding 8,12% of Votes and 14 MPs, "Most-Hid" can be part of a Coalition with the other former Opposition parties, totalling all together more about 45% of the Votes and 79 MPs.

Such a possible New Government Coalition may find support, at certain key points, also by another 6% or 7% of Slovak Voters, therefore advancing well beyond an Absolute Majorty of more than +51% of voting Citizens : Indeed, a third newcomer, Rightist "People's Party - Our Slovakia" got, for the 1st time, almost 34.000 votes (+1,33%) but no MP, i.e. more than the older "Union Party for Slovakia", which kept nearly 18.000 votes. Quasi-Homonym, but differend (member EU Parliament's Liberal Group) "People's Party - For a Democratic Slovakia", which just kept 109.450 Voters without MPs this time (with 4,32%) of Votes, has also formally excluded "any recognition of Turkey' controversial aim to accede into the EU at least as long as the Turkish Military Occupation persists in (the Northern Territories) of Cyprus".  

-------------------------
Isolated, the outgoing Socialdemocratic party HZDS, despite its 34% of Votes and 62 MPs, falls short of a majority after its Former partners fell down, either being eliminated, (as another Hungarian Minority Party, which loses - 20 MPs, failing to reach the 5% threshold) , or diminishing, as the discredited Nationalist SNS Party which drops down to only 9 MPs, accused of Discrimination and Corruption.

However, the Turn-out in 2010 Parliamentary Election, (which determines the Government), was Higher than Past Year's 2009 Presidential Election (that Socialist party-supported candidate Gasparovic had won in front of ChristianDemocrat candidate Iveta Radicova), attracting almost 55% of Slovak Citizens voting now, instead of only 51% last year, (i.e. an Augmentation of more than + 4% in Participation on 2010).

To put it in a nutshell : All other Center-Right Parties which Win more Votes and/or MPs in the 2010 Election compared to 2006, (5 or 3 Parties respectively), are more or less Critical of Bureaucracy and of Turkey's controversial EU bid. So that if Radicova (whose party stands first, but with only a short edge) would really want to build a solid New Government Coalition, she would obviously be well advised to find a way to include this Healthy Popular Criticism, able to link both 4 Slovak Parties' New Goverment by Christian-Democrats and Liberals in 2010, and all Slovakia to 2007 - 2009 French, German and EU Parliament Elections, among a wider range also of other convergent recent EU developments, of obvious crucial importance for EU's Future.

- Significantly, it's, indeed, by "looking forward to working with them for a better Future for Slovakia and for Europe", that the Chairman of EU Parliament's largest political Group, EPP, Joseph Daul MEP, "congratulate(d) Iveta Radicova (SDKU-DS) and Ján Figel' (KDH)"?

- "The centre-right EPP parties have won the general elections in the Republic of Slovakia and now have the opportunity to lead a new government. I congratulate them on this success... The citizens of Slovakia deserve to have a new government, free of cheap, false promises", declared Daul, observing that "the centre-right parties in Slovakia have proven in the past that they can lead Slovakia out of economic difficulty and provide the country with much needed Coherent and Capable Leadership",

***

EUPartnersInvestors

Statistics

Visitors: 59146079

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarkozy_merkel_berlin__stras_400

Sarkozy and Merkel : June 2009 solution to May 2005 "NO" ?

 - Will French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel live up from June 2009 to their obvious Historic European mission to revitalize, and re-launch the "European Dream", after the series of 3 "NO" since May 2005 in France, the Netherlands and Ireland, by renewing, and changing the EU with fresh stimulus, big horizons, and values attractive for EU Citizens ?

Whatever views anyone might have, it's a Fact that, recently, EU's political spectrum didn't produce other more charismatic and popular EU leaders than Merkel and Sarkozy, starting from September 2005 and May 2007, respectively.

This trend was confirmed, in one way or another, both during the German EU presidency in 2007 (shared by Merkel with the SPD), and mainly during the French EU Presidency in 2008, (with Sarkozy "free" to move).


The positive 2009 EU Polls are a natural consequence :

- Both with 72% Sarkozy and Merkel are considered by EU Citizens to be "the most Influential" leaders in Europe, by far.

- They are the only EU political leaders to attract a Majority of "Positive" views by EU Citizens, (Merkel over 60%, Sarkozy over 50%, particularly in the continent).

- 60% of EU Citizens find the 2008 French EU Presidency "Good", (and the satisfaction grows up to 67,5% in continental Europe).

The Poll was made by "OpinionWay" in big EU countries as Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK, (with the only exception of France), from 26 to 28 May 2009.

sarkozy_merkel_polls_400

But the most important is that both Franco-German leaders seem willing to, at last, really start serious business on EU's indispensable renovation and Renaissance from 2009 : Year of crucial EU and German Elections.

Therefore, this time, the joint European move by Sarkozy and Merkel, which just published a common Franco-German Manifesto, aims to stimulate aspirations and action not only in their respective countries, but also in many other EU "partners", as they say.

Both on EU economy, social values and scientifico-technologic research, as well as on Turkey's controversial EU bid, obviously incompatible with a popular Political Europe, whose Citizens can find a collective Identity and popular Values, they have already started to magnetize various growing voices accross the European landscape :

"Today, more than ever, it' time for action", they stress from the outset.

Facing "an unprecedented Global financial and economic Crisis", "Europeans must get resolutely involved if they want for the World which is being built to meet their Values of Liberty, Solidarity and Justice".

"That's what we want" and "propose to our Partners" :

* "A strong Europe, able to protect us" :

- "We refuse a Bureaucratic EU, which mecanically applies burdensome rules and is afraid of change. We want a European Union which listens what Citizens have to say, which innovates, stimulates".

- "We want a strong and united EU in the World, while also respecting its Member States' Diversity", which "brings Courageous Replies to the Questions of our Times, ensuring our Prosperity :  

This implies to "favor Research and Innovation", "Economic Coordination", to "develop real Policies on Immigrationn, Energy, Defence, and modernise  common policies, particularly Agriculture".

*  "EU must bring immediate replies to the Global Crisis".

- "Lawless liberalism failed". "The Model we want is that of a Responsible Market Economy, which favors Enterpreneurs and Workers, above Speculators ;  Long-term Investment, over immediate profiits".

- "We appeal upon the EU to take, from June, the first decisions to ensure a real European Regulation of Financial Markets, based on coordination and cooperation". "On speculative funds, on fiscal heavens, CEO's and financial operators' earnings, EU must give the example".

- "We call to change the rules of accounts, which are important for our Economy's revival : The competent normative authorities must take action". "The issue of a sufficient Credit offer is of central importance for our Economy". "We don't accept that, during this Financial Crisis, the European Banks' capacity to lend money might be unjustly reduced by Capital's requirements and accountant's rules

* "During the German and French Presidencies, EU has resoçlutely prepared itself for the fight against Global Warming... EU is the 1st and only area in the World to have adopted a package of ambitious and legally binding rules to comply with International Aims"

- "We have now to convince our Friends and Partners, to get involved, in order to atteint, next December at Copenhagen, a Global Agreement worthy of whay is at stake. Our closer ally, the US, but also other big industrial countries, must commit themselves with the same force as the Europeans".

"Green Growth is a Chance ... and an opportunity to create jobs turned towards the Future. Europe must be a leader".

- But, at the same time, we must ensure that our companies remain competitive in the World. The ambitious European involvements on Climat must not lead into a position where EU industry might become a Victim of Unfair Competition. Climat protection and Competitvity must go together. If our International partners refuse to associate themselves to our efforts, we are determined to take measures to protect European Industry"

* "Europe must be more ambitious for its Industry" : "It must favor the emergence of strong European enterprises at a Global level".

- "As long as an International mechanism" to "monitor Public Aids at WTO level, and hinder 3rd Countries to give abusive subsidies to their enterprises, provoking unfair competition", is "not yet set up, we must consider Transitory European Solutions".

* "The current Public Debt is too heavy... We must head anew towards sound public finance, as soon as we'd have passed the crucial stage in this crisis".
-------------------------------------------------

* Last, but not least :  "Europe must play a top-level role in the World"

- "For that purpose,  it needs efficient Institutions. That's why we need Lisbon Treaty". "The 27 Member States decided, last December (2008) that the Treaty should enter into force before the end of this year (2009)". To obtain that, June EU Council must agree "on the Guarantees for Ireland".

- But, "to be able to act, EU needs Borders. An Enlargment without Limits is not possible", Sarkozy and Merkel stressed in an obvious reference to Turkey, etc.

- "In order to be strong, Europe must assume its Values and its Identity". "Human Rights .. are at the basis of our commitment for a Peaceful Development accross the World".

- "For that purpose, we shall strengthen our common Defence and Security policy".
----------------------

* "We are ready to contribute to activate the EU towards the realisation of these aims, with our EU Partners".

"In order to succeed", Europe  "needs the active involvment of all, starting by Citizens themselves. That's why the June 7 rendez-vous is important", and "we are calling all Europeans to vote".

"We are convinced that, if Europe wants, Europe can", they conclude.
-----------------------

Precisely : - What can better forge "Europe's Will" than a "European Consciousness" emerging from political, democratic struggles to face Global Challenges, and open big New Horizons, including by crystal-clear Public Debates, with active EU Citizens' involvement, before the most important EU Decisions affecting People's lives ?

Precisely what "EuroFora"s project warns since 1997-2007, and unprecedented Majority Abstentions, since 1999-2004, added to 3 "NO" to EU Referenda in 2005 and 2007, proved meanwhile..

Let's hope that the Time wasted by some scandalous anti-European and anti-Democratic obstacles of the Past, will stimulate faster, simplified but substantial and persistent, efficient action.-

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING