english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow EU Rapporteurs to EuroFora: Space project GMES threatened for costs equal to Turkey unpopular EU bid

EU Rapporteurs to EuroFora: Space project GMES threatened for costs equal to Turkey unpopular EU bid

Written by ACM
Tuesday, 17 January 2012

 gmes__400

*Strasbourg/EU Parliament/Angelo Marcopolo/- EU's probably most important and topical, High-Tech. Space program, GMES, ("Global Monitoring for Environment and Security") may be threatened by costs' reductions for sums equal to ... Turkey's controversial and unpopular EU bid, revealed the replies to "EuroFora"s Questions by Inter-Group on "Sky and Space" leading MEPs, and EU Parliament's Rapporteurs on GMES, in a Press Conference in Strasbourg where the issue started to be discussed in view of imminent, forthcoming EU developments and decisions :


A group of MEPs from various political Groups and Countries recently wrote to EU Commission's President Barroso a Letter protesting against a Draft which is going to exclude, for the 1st time, GMES from EU's Multi-Annual Financial Perspectives 2014-2020, restricting its Funding to merely annual EU Budgets' decisions, with the obvious risk to provoke uncertainties incompatible with long-term Investments, and to leave the strategic High-Tech project, totally or partly, at one or another moment, in limbo.
-------------------------------------------------------------

agg_question_to_sky_intergroup_meps_on_gmes_cost_equalling_turkey_s_controversial__unpopular_eu_bid.._400


     "EuroFora"'s questions to EU Parliament's Repporteurs on GMES started by reminding the fact  that "there were also in the Past some Delays on funding another landmark EU's Space Programs, such as, f.ex. GALILEO (on Satellite Navigation Systems), and Europe lost an opportunity to have, f.e. China a.o. 3rd Countries paticipate for some 400 Millions €.. So that, now China has its own Satellite Navigation System.. Do you think that there might be similar, or even worse, risks now if EU delays also its GMES program ?", we asked the Inter-Party Group of MEPs.

agg_observes_that_gmes_costs_as_much_as_.._turkey_400

    => But, entering substantial issues, "EuroFora"s 2nd Question concluded by asking the competent EU Rapporteurs from various poliical groups, to clarify "How much is the Money, what kind of volume of Money are we speaking of (in the case of GMES) ? Can we compare it, f.ex., with other (EU) expenses, for which the Money apparently exists, in order to have Debates about  real and concrete Political Choices  ?".
-------------------------
    Norbert Glante, experienced former EU Parliament's Rapporteur on GALILEO, and current co-Rapporteur on GMES for Industry/Research, a German Socialist MEP, started to reply to "EuroFora"s question by observing, first, that "these are 2 Differend EU Projects : GALILEO is an Infrastructure project, that the EU Commission is funding wholesale"


    - "At the beginning, the GALILEO project was meant to be a Public-Private partrneship. Two consortia competed, but afterwards they went together, they merged, and there was, therefore, no more competition. With the consent of (EU) Parliament, the Commission decided, then, to fund  itself the program.


    - Now", ²"it's true that "we had Delays", but "they were not just for the Funding : There were (also) Technical Delays, there was f.ex. a Partner in China that steped out, etc.". However, "Today, our Hope is that EU Commission is able to send out 18 Satellites in orbit by 2014, and guarantee a 1st step. This is not the original idea, but hopefully it will happen", he concluded.

glante_replies_to_agg_quest_on_gmes_400

    + "GMES requires 5,8 Billions €, which means that we can get Satellite configurations in Orbit. National/Private Telecommunication Satellites could be added to. They could provide Data to create (New) Services. If you put the 5,8 Billions €, this is Money which should be ready to be provided during the next Financial Perspectives Period of 2014 - 2020,  and, if we have a Budget Debate, when we look at the Financial Perspectives, we know that the (EU) Parliament has significant clouts and influence."


    - "You have to set Priorities, of course you do. But I think that when it comes to Space, when it comes to Industrial Policy, I think that we (EU) have a Competitice Advantage to the World, that we need to keep that. "We need to keep our Technological Future in our own hands. We should do it here, and I think that we should do it in the EU, and, therefore, in the EU Budget". Because, "if we start to pull away, we'll end up with a situation where an American Ambassador will come to fruition and say : - "Just let Stop everything, and buy it all from the States !", Glante warned.
----------------------
    + But Italian, ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP, Aldo Patriciello, EU Parliament's co-Rapporteur on Satellites, gave an even more specific answer particularly to "EuroFora"s most crucial, 2nd question (See supra) :

mep_pietricello_satellites_raapporteur_replies_to_ag_quest_on_gmes_funding_400


    - "I want to remind that it's important to think about the Funding, by considering (also) what it had costed until Today : GMES has costed 3 Billions € until Today. So, if we don't invest in it, this basically means Wipping away all those enormous investments and efforts made until today", he pointed out.


    - But "GMES is critical into tackling Climate Change, Environmental degradation, Border Control, Maritime Surveillance, Civil Protection, etc. i.e. ¨Priorities which are part and parcell of our (EU)'s overall Strategies"  => In consequence, "I think that here, we need to stand Firm in the (EU) Parliament. We need to make Sure that the EU Commission includes the GMES in the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework with around 800 Millions € in order to get to the 5.8 Billions € which have been mentioned".


    - "But, let me remind you, that this Budget is important also because of the Economic Return for Europe : It is estimated that the Economic Return would be 69 Billions € in the long run. So, this is also going to help (EU's) Economic Recovery", he warned.

------------- 
    - "Just to make it clear", "EuroFora" questioned further Patriciello : - In other words, "this (GMES) means something around 900 Millions € per year, what Mr. Glande said.  i.e. just what EU gives f.ex. for simple Accession Negotiations with one Country, f.ex. Turkey", we observed.

agg_observes_that_gmes_costs_as_much_as_...turkey...__400


    => -"Yes : It (GMES) is 850 to 900 Millions € per Annum", admitted Patriciello, i.e.  almost exactly what EU spends annually just for Turkey's controversial and unpopular EU bid !..
----------------------------------------------------------

 - "Let me give you un Example, which is the Conservation of Rain Forests", went on to add in Reply to "EuroFora" Questions, Professor Vittorio Prodi, President of the "Sky and Space" InterGroup, and EU Parliament's Rapporteur on GMES and Environment : "Those Countries where Rain Forests are allocated, if they want to help the rest of the Planet, then, they have a Right to Compensatory Payments. Now, all of this could get into the parts of the (CO2) Emissions' Trading Scheme. And this is a contribution which could mean that the GMES has a real boon in terms of Financial Resources, so that, basically, this Infrastructure will pay for itself, in very short order"...

prodi_replies_to_agg_quest_gmes_will_pay_for_itself_400


    - "Therefore, I think that it's absolutely Right that we focus on these Points" (on comparing Funds, as "EuroFora" suggested : Comp. Supra). "Not only this program will pay for itself, but it will also have an immediate counter-cyclical impact", Prodi concluded.
-------------
     - "On issues like GALILEO and GMES we always had the large Majority of EU Parliament with us. So, we intend to ask to (EU) Member States to put the Money where their Mouth is, and to recognize where the Value is", particularly when they speak about (EU) Industrial policy, Growth, etc., Glante anounced about forthcoming MEPs debates and Votes.


 - "These are precisely the kind of projects where there is a Time Gap between the Investment and the Return. .. So, if an IPP doesn't work, then, we have to insist on Project Bonds : This in a European Value Infrastructure !", Prodi concluded.

 

(../..)
 

***

(NDLR : "DraftNews", as already sent earlier to "EuroFora"s Subrscribers/Donors. A more accurate and complete Final Version is due asap).

***

European Entrepreneurial Region

Statistics

Visitors: 58969097

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 imag0087_400_01

Recent developments proved that Europe can suceed to overcome challenges by aiming at great objectives, and this is needed also in 2009, said EU chairman, French President Nicolas Sarkozy.

    - "It's in the name of Great Ideas, Projects, Ambition and Ideals, that EU can overcome" challenges, stressed Sarkozy at EU Parliament in Strasbourg, in conclusion of a dense 7 months EU Chairmanship. "It's even easier for Europe to have Great projects, able to overcome national egoism, instead of limiting itself only to small projects" (unable to do alike), he observed.     

- "Europe must remain Ambitious and understand that the World needs her to take Decisions". "The World needs a Strong Europe", which "thinks on its own, has convictions, its own responses, its imagination" : "A Europe which does not limit itself into following" others, (as it did in the Past, when it followed USA, f.ex. on Bosnia). On the contrary, "Europe should undertake its own responsibilities", he said, after a series of succes in stopping the War between Russia and Georgia, and organizing the 1st EuroZone's Summit in Paris, which incited the Washington DC G-20 Summit to extend similar decisions World-wide.  


    - "When you sweep it all under the carpet, prepare yourself for hard tomorrows", he warned. "What hinders decisions is the lack of Courage and Will, the fading away of Ideals", he stressed before EU Parliament's 2008 debate on Human Rights and Sakharov prize on Freedom of thought attributed by MEPs to Chinese cyber-dissident Hu Jia, followed by an EU - Turkey meeting on Friday.

    - "I don't abandon my convictions" and "I will take initiatives" on EU level also in 2009, Sarkozy announced later. "France will not stop having convictions and taking initiatives" on Europe. + "It's an Error to wish to pass over the Heads of those who are elected in their Countries" : "It's an integrism I always fought against"', he warned.
---------------------
French EU Presidency faced 4 unexpected Crisis :

- An institutional crisis, with the Irish "No" to EU Lisbon Treaty, just before it started. A geopolitical crisis, wth the threat of War between Russia and Georgia risking to throw Europe back to Cold-war divisions, on August. A World-wide Financial and Economic crisis, arriving at a bad moment before crucial 2009 EU elections. And even a Strasbourg's mini-crisis, with EU Parliament's roof curiously falling down, from unknown reasons, in a brand new building on August, provoking an unprecedented transfert of the 2 September Plenary Sessions...

But it wasn't enough to stop Sarkozy ! On the contrary, it stimulated him...
---------------------------------------

- "The better way to deal with the recent problems of EU institutions (as the "3 NO" by France, the Netherlands and Ireland) is to take them as a "Test" in order to find solutions closer to Citizens' concerns", said later in Strasbourg Sarkozy's new choice as Ministe for EU affairs, Bruno Le Maire.

- On the Institutional front, Sarkozy gave Time to the Irish to think about it, and stroke on December a deal including a New Referendum after the June 2009 EU Elections, in exchange of a promise to keep the rule of "one EU Commissioner for each EU Member Country", and some opt-outs on Defence and Fiscal EU policies, Abortion, etc. If the Irish get a "Yes" Majority, then the institutional package could be completed in 2010 or 2011 on the occasion of Croatia's probable EU accession.

He was accused in Strasbourg to upgrade EU Council and downgrade EU Commision, but he replied that "strong Political initiatives by EU Council reinforce also the more technical role of EU Commission, under the political-technical leadership of its President", all 3 "working together with EU Parliament".


- But, meanwhile, Sarkozy energetically spearheaded an Historic 1st Summit of EuroZone's 15 Heads of State and Government at EU's core, exceptionally enlarged to a partial participation of British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, on October 12 in Paris' Elysee palace, which started to tackle succesfully the growing world Financial crisis.

    It also paved the way for its endorsement by a subsequent Brussels' 27 EU Member States' gathering, before it all come to Washington's G-20 Summit. And "Europe was united, it asked for the 1st G-20 Summit, and it will also organise the next G-20 Summit on April in London", he observed.   

 But a Conference with EU, Russia, African and other Developing Countries, hosted in Strasbourg shortly after Washington G-20 Summit by the French EU Presidency, took a Resolution asking to enlarge participation to Global Economic Governance. Many found, indeed, illogic and unacceptable that f.ex. states as Turkey were given a seat at G-20 level, while all African Countries, and even the African Union itself, representing the greatest Continent on Earth, were excluded...


    Meanwhile, even USA''s "Paulson No 3" Plan, was, in fact, inspired by Europe's No 1 Plan", Sarkozy observed, largelly applauded by MEPs.

    And "Europe showed Solidarity" by mobilizing some 22 Billion credit for Hungary, 1,7 billion for Ukraine, as we do nowadays for Baltic States, etc., he added.

    The move on Economy was extended on December by an EU stimulus' plan totalling some 200 billion Euros, including 5 Billions released by EU Commission for big Projects, as well as various parallel National plans for Economic revival, (fex. 26 billions in France alone). They might appear limited, compared to USA President-elect Obama's reported plan to boost the American economy with 800 billion $, but at least succeded to overcome Europe's divisions for the first time on Economic governance, opening new horizons.

- The French President stressed even harder the unique role of an active EU Council's chairmanship, when he moved swiftly and efficiently, at the beginning of August, to succesfully stop War between Russia and Georgia, at the last minute, which threatened to bring Europe back to Cold War division.

"We (EU) also wanted to avoid a situation like in Bosnia, in the Past, when EU was absent, so that our American friends took their responsibilitues, and EU only followed", despite the fact that the conflict took place in Europe. Now, it was the EU who took its responsibilities".

A roadmap towards a new PanEuropean Security policy, before which all unilateral moves to place new Missiles (from USA or Russia) would be freezed, was proposed by Sarkozy after a meeting with Russian president Medvedev, at the eve of Washington DC's G-20 Summit.

Ukraine's "European" character was stressed at a Sarkozy - Jushenko Summit, September in Paris, while EU adopted on December an "Eastern policy", in which, "I'm convinced that our (EU's) future is to find with our Neighbours the conditions for Economic Development. Peace and Security, by explaining them that.. they must respect (Human Rights') Values, and adopt behaviors different from the Past", explained Sarkozy in Strasbourg.

Meanwhile, the "Union for the Mediterranean" was created, since July's Summit if 45 Heads of State and Government in Paris, as "an organisation for a permanent Dialogue, that we need", mainly in order to tackle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, by bringing together, for the 1st time, Israelis and Arabs, where "Europe must be present, in order to avoid a frontal clash".

- "If Europe doesn't take its part for Peace in the Middle-East, nobody else will do that in our place", Sarkozy stressed.
-----------------------
    Meanwhile, other EU Agreements were brokered during the French EU Presidency on Immigration, (fex. common Asylum rules, etc), and Climat- Energy :

    - On Climat-Energy, the 2007 German EU Presidency had fixed a triple 20% aim for 2020 (20% renewable Energies, 20% reduction of CO2 emmission, 20% energy efficience/economies), and the 2008 French EU Presidecny realized that, making the necessary compromises in order to modernize EU's industry, but without throwing some former Central-Eastern European Countries into abrupt Economic break down risking "social explosion".

    - Defence-Security EU policy was mainly postponed for April 2009, since both German chancellor Merkel and French president Sarkozy want to strike a deal with the new American president Obama in Strasbourg's NATO Summit.

    However, with all these 4 unexpected Crisis diverting attention to other urgencies, People wil wonder now, what happened to the famous deal proposed by freshly-elected French President Sarkozy on Turkey's controversial EU bid, back on August 2007, to continue EU - Turkey negotiations, but on the double condition that core chapters, intrinsequally linked with EU Membership, will be excluded, and that a collective Reflexion and Debate on Europe's future would start before the end of 2008.

    It was meant to reply to the crucial question : What kind of Europe do we want in 10 or 20 Years from now : A large Market, or a Political Europe, with a popular identity ? In Sarkozy's thinking, presented in his 2 landmark speeches on Europe in Strasbourg, shortly before and after the 2007 Elections, (on February and July 2007), Turkey's controversial EU bid would be incompatible with the second choice.

    It's true that EU Commision's Chairman, Jose Barroso, (who had notoriously declared, as former Portuguese Prime Minister, that he found "nonsense" the idea that Europe might become equal to the US), had repeatedly tried to avoid that Sarkozy's criticism on Turkey might start winning a larger audience in Europe, preferring a discrete "wismens' committee" work. And that most of the personalities later chosen in order to participate in a Committee on Europe's Future, are too much linked with Socialist parties and/or American policies, to be really critical of USA's notorious wish to impose Turkey to the EU, as Sarkozy had noted himself since March 2007..

     - "It's on EU Council's presidency to take political initiatives. EU Commission has other competences", stressed Sarkozy. The "European Ideal" is to "build Europe with the States, not against them". "Ask Europeans to chose between their countries and Europe won't work. You don't choose between your two parents : We must add them together".

    "France and Germany have an Historic Duty to work together, precisely because of what happened to the Past. We have to work hand by hand. We cannot be separated.It goes beyond me and Mrs Merkel today, Mr Schroeder and Mr. Chirac yesterday. It's not a choice, it's a duty to Europe and to the World".  "We need Germany, as Germany needs Europe". Compromise is inevitable, here as everywhere, and each one made some steps towards eachother's positions.

    But "it's true that Mrs Merkel didn't chose her Socialist partners, while I chose mine", Sarkozy said, in an indirect hint that the Socialist Minister of Finance in Germany might be a cause of minor past disagreements in Economy, which were overcome in recent negotiations.

    "We (France and Germany) have particular duties in Europe", but "in a Europe of 27 Member States, it's not enough for France and Germany to agree between them.

    "I always thought that Great Britain has a special role to play in Europe. ... Now, everybody "saw what it cost payed the UK for having been too exclusively open towards the US (and) Financial services. Europe needs the UK, but also the UK needs Europe" :- "We were able to face the hardest moment of the Financial crisis because the UK clearly chose Europe", stressed Sarkozy, reminding Gordon Brown's exceptional participation to the Historic 1st Heads of State/Government Summit of EuroZone, October 12 in Paris (See EuroFora's Reportage from Elysee Palace then).

     - "Some look at Europe with old glasses aged 30 years ago. While we must look at her in relation to what it will be in 30 years" in the Future, Sarkozy concluded.

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING